Breaking Durham Spygate Leak - The Entire USA Democratic Process Was Being Subverted

From what I can ascertain, spygate actually started in 2015. Multiple leaks from other sources have claimed this. A rogue group decided they wanted to choose our president, one that matched their hawkish foreign policy. I strongly feel that this is what took Bernie down. Ok enough of subjecture.


Now flash forward to the election. These RETIRED CIA/BUSH CHENEY NEOCONS/FBI/DNC individuals attempted to sway the election to their ultimate desires and later tried to coup the results. Both republicans and democrats. This article is a must read.

The CIA’s Murderous Practices, Disinformation Campaigns, and Interference in Other Countries Still Shape the World Order and U.S. Politics

Ok so Trump won, and this rogue group continued to a coup. If you recall the attempt to null our election results etc., well they failed. Fast forward to early 2017 where they formed an organization to fight Trump.

This link is from the previous article. The Alliance for Securing America, also known as the German Marshall Fund. They were also responsible for Hamilton68. This rogue group is also responsible for the creation of a paid Russia Rumor task forces.

The True Traitors

Here’s a partial list of the members of The Alliance for Securing America org made to fight against Trump. The German Marshall Fund brought other countries into this, such as Italy etc...

The Democrat, Laura Rosenberger, served as a foreign policy adviser for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and chief of staff to two Obama national security officials. The Republican is Jamie Fly, who spent the last four years as counselor for foreign and national security affairs to one of the Senate’s most hawkish members, Marco Rubio; prior to that, he served in various capacities in the Bush Pentagon and National Security Council.

Thus, alongside Jake Sullivan (national security adviser to Joe Biden and the Clinton campaign), Mike Morrell (Obama’s acting CIA director) and Mike McFaul (Obama’s ambassador to Russia) sit leading neocons such as Mike Chertoff (Bush’s homeland security secretary), Mike Rogers (the far-right, supremely hawkish former congressman who now hosts a right-wing radio show); and Bill Kristol himself.

To collaborate the intercept claims I present a Paul Sperry Durham leak.

DEVELOPING: Special prosecutor Durham said to be looking at retired CIA cronies of Brennan -- including Mike Morell -- for helping politicize intelligence and spreading false rumors about Trump and Russia during 2016 campaign, including some as part of paid special task force

Paul Sperry

Further evidence of what was going on is this Feb 2016 email from Peter Strzok to Mike Morell. An invitation of sorts. Hmmmm... Recall Morell being listed as a main player and well, we all know Strzok.

Strzok To Morell Email

The next month, March 2016, we have an email from Mike Morell to John Podesta of the DNC wanting to touch base. Ah yes, adds to the appearance of a collaboration as mentioned above.

Email Between John Podesta of DNC and Mike Morell

To be deleted

a reply to: madmac5150

Not done yet was afraid of losing my work. This is a whopper.

a reply to: elouina
Alert! You need to change your Title to not use ALL CAPS, or ATS moderators may change it to all small letters.. very ugly.

a reply to: elouina
Is this what Temp Director of National Intelligence Ric Grenell said he was going to release, before relinquishing his position to Permanent DNI John Ratcliff next week? (Ratcliffe was approved by the US Senate this past Thursday)

She was never supposed to lose

a reply to: carewemust

I suspect not, this will likely be smaller drips. The RICO case is the largest part of the Durham investigation and I don’t think we will be seeing much of this besides leaks. Durham team has adopted a RICO aka organized crime specialist and expanded their team tremendously. This is not a minor revelation.

It is rumored that many of the names of those charged will not be recognizable by most. I suspect you all will though.

Nongate.

originally posted by: briantaylor
Nongate.

Normally I could forgive this for not knowing, but what did you just read here?

This is disgusting. Nobody wants to read that.

a reply to: madmac5150

a reply to: dashen

That picture is the stuff of nightmares, it's just missing the corporate logo that has taken over politics.

What you are about to read is true.
The names have been changed to protect the guilty.
You have entered the sellout zone.

originally posted by: elouina
From what I can ascertain, spygate actually started in 2015. Multiple leaks from other sources have claimed this. A rogue group decided they wanted to choose our president, one that matched their hawkish foreign policy. I strongly feel that this is what took Bernie down. Ok enough of subjecture.

My understanding is it started much earlier than 2015, but that the current spygate case primarily started with the spying on General Flynn in 2014, because he was the head of the DIA, and was not going along with Obama's policies.

The election aspects, and Flynn's stated goals of actually auditing the entire Intelligence Community/Agencies for the first time ever as Trumps potential NSA only fueled the fire, which turning into a raging inferno when Trump actually won the election.

a reply to: elouina

What "took Bernie down" is not getting enough votes in the Primaries, and deciding to temporarily join a party with Superdelegates.

No entity ever disputed the results of the Electoral College to my knowledge. Clinton fans did rail on about the popular vote totals (as did Trump fans, but I digress).

As far as the rest ... why do you believe your source? Please ignore OP. I don't want to distract from the Bashing.

a reply to: tanstaafl

Or ...

Flynn was dirty all along and the Feds knew it.

Supposition could justify both positions.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: tanstaafl
Or ...

Flynn was dirty all along and the Feds knew it.

Supposition could justify both positions.

No, they can't because Flynn wasn't dirty. There is zero - repeat, ZERO evidence of it, except the plea deal, for which there is more than ample evidence that it was extorted, through threats to persecute his son.

So, no, there is absolutely no 'justification' for any argument of Flynn being dirty.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: tanstaafl
Or ...

Flynn was dirty all along and the Feds knew it.

Supposition could justify both positions.

No, they can't because Flynn wasn't dirty. There is zero - repeat, ZERO evidence of it, except the plea deal, for which there is more than ample evidence that it was extorted, through threats to persecute his son.

So, no, there is absolutely no 'justification' for any argument of Flynn being dirty.

Yeah, there's no corroboration for the Tennessee/Ohio Star articles that claim to document a Treasury Department whistleblower either, but you've incorporated that into your beliefs.

Anyway, carry on.

My understanding is it started much earlier than 2015, but that the current spygate case primarily started with the spying on General Flynn in 2014, because he was the head of the DIA, and was not going along with Obama's policies.

Yes and here is your proof if you have not seen it yet..


And now she is going to explain it all to Trump
mobile.twitter.com...

a reply to: tanstaafl

And now they got so mad, they released a virus with military variants and traces !!!!!

Each loss and setback brings a stronger response !!!!!

😁