It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This is as in-your-face as it can get...
page: 4share:
a reply to: Vroomfondel
Stay tune.
Stay tune.
edit on 0500000030482020-05-19T10:48:30-05:00483005am10 by musicismagic because: (no reason given)
whoa that was Blatant.
George Bush Sr is the only one I've ever heard just say it out loud like that.
She really took it home didn't she.
George Bush Sr is the only one I've ever heard just say it out loud like that.
She really took it home didn't she.
I acknowledge the possibility that her comments could have been entirely benign. But I must also maintain the possibility that they were not.
Any politician that uses the phrases; "mandatory compliance", "pledge allegiance to", and "new world order", in one speech is either ignorant beyond compare or trying to say something or both. 'Freudian slip' keeps coming to mind.
I would not put it past Chicago politicians to be that brazen. I would, however, hope that even when plumbing the depths of the Chicago DNC one would find IQ's higher than that. But then I am reminded of 'Guam tipping over' ...
I cant read her mind. I don't know for certain that her words were completely innocent. Or if she was just trying to use buzz words to sound relevant. Or if in the back of her mind she knows this is part of something bigger and more sinister.
All things considered I prefer the latter.
Any politician that uses the phrases; "mandatory compliance", "pledge allegiance to", and "new world order", in one speech is either ignorant beyond compare or trying to say something or both. 'Freudian slip' keeps coming to mind.
I would not put it past Chicago politicians to be that brazen. I would, however, hope that even when plumbing the depths of the Chicago DNC one would find IQ's higher than that. But then I am reminded of 'Guam tipping over' ...
I cant read her mind. I don't know for certain that her words were completely innocent. Or if she was just trying to use buzz words to sound relevant. Or if in the back of her mind she knows this is part of something bigger and more sinister.
All things considered I prefer the latter.
Seriously, a bit of ash in the hair and she has her Halloween costume ready
a reply to: Vroomfondel
Why do most conversations around the NWO take place from the perspective that it's something to come... not something we are already in?
"You best start believin' in ghost stories Miss Turner, you're in one" - H. Barbossa
Why do most conversations around the NWO take place from the perspective that it's something to come... not something we are already in?
"You best start believin' in ghost stories Miss Turner, you're in one" - H. Barbossa
a reply to: MarkOfTheV
I think that's probably a two part answer. One is that most people are still in some stage of denial about it. The idea of our freedom being a facade is too much of a change from traditional thinking for some to embrace. The other half is that when speaking of the NWO people usually think of a huge impact on society, mass revolts, black helicopters hovering over the neighborhood, etc.
In reality I think its much more of a trickle than a tidal wave. Inch by inch. Then one day the general population pops their head out of their burrow and finds the landscape has changed. And its too late to do anything about it.
I think that's probably a two part answer. One is that most people are still in some stage of denial about it. The idea of our freedom being a facade is too much of a change from traditional thinking for some to embrace. The other half is that when speaking of the NWO people usually think of a huge impact on society, mass revolts, black helicopters hovering over the neighborhood, etc.
In reality I think its much more of a trickle than a tidal wave. Inch by inch. Then one day the general population pops their head out of their burrow and finds the landscape has changed. And its too late to do anything about it.
Wow. I did not expect her to flat out say it. It's almost TOO in your face and out there. I asked myself if they're really THAT arrogant and
confident. Then I saw some people complaining on the comment section of this video how the people over there on Facebook are turning a blind eye to
this and it answered my question. No matter what they say, even if they flat out said "we want to control the people and take away their freedom"
people would still call us conspiracy nuts and that we're misinterpreting things. The amount of mind control those high up have over the people is
unbelievable.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
OMG
This woman used the term New World Order. Or was that new world order. Was she talking about the New World Order of just talking about how things should be now after and on going with this virus, In other words the ''new normal''.
...
I don't think pledging allegiance to the "new normal" makes much sense. Just my take.
a reply to: DarkestConspiracyMoon
To be fair, there is a member on this thread who says the video is out of context and the mayor is referring only to something called Alderman privilege in Chicago. I contend that even if that was her intent there is still the idea that the manner in which Alderman privilege is to be controlled is part of something bigger, more nefarious.
I try to be transparent in the interest of honest debate and show both sides of the coin, but my beliefs are as stated.
To be fair, there is a member on this thread who says the video is out of context and the mayor is referring only to something called Alderman privilege in Chicago. I contend that even if that was her intent there is still the idea that the manner in which Alderman privilege is to be controlled is part of something bigger, more nefarious.
I try to be transparent in the interest of honest debate and show both sides of the coin, but my beliefs are as stated.
originally posted by: 727Sky
Through out all of history there have been those who want to control the thoughts and actions of others. China is an expert at forcing their communist will just as Islam and their version of a religion is another great model of control. However if history is studied there comes a day when the population says, "Enough!".. Then you get to watch or participate in the justly deserved down fall. I expect things to heat up these next few months for the control freaks and their enforcers. Which way it goes all the depends on who stands firm and brings the biggest crowd IMO.
I have always said this. Just look at history. Dictatorships, never last.
a reply to: Halfswede
That got me too. Even if she was not referring directly to the NWO, who uses three phrases like "pledge allegiance to", "mandatory compliance", and "new world order" in the same speech to refer to normal everyday business? If it was not an intentional reference to the NWO I think it could have been a Freudian slip of the same nature.
That got me too. Even if she was not referring directly to the NWO, who uses three phrases like "pledge allegiance to", "mandatory compliance", and "new world order" in the same speech to refer to normal everyday business? If it was not an intentional reference to the NWO I think it could have been a Freudian slip of the same nature.
we have lost our anger. we have been defeated.
there was a time, back in the sleepy past, that people would have rose up against such tyranny.
the blatant, in your face take away of everything, would not have been allowed.
we are in different times now,we dont push back much anymore.we take, what they take away, and live with it.
going down with a whimper.
there was a time, back in the sleepy past, that people would have rose up against such tyranny.
the blatant, in your face take away of everything, would not have been allowed.
we are in different times now,we dont push back much anymore.we take, what they take away, and live with it.
going down with a whimper.
a reply to: Vroomfondel
Pledge allegiance to the NWO? sign me up i like wrestling! oh you mean that NWO.
Here's the thing, there has always been a new world order and always will be. The Templars started noble but were corrupted by money and power, the bavarian illuminati tried the same but disbanded, who knows what evolved into, and the freemasons, yeah sure they stick their beak here and there but don't meddle as much as conspiracy theorists think.
I read a book who simply calls TPTB as 'the cabal' who only answer to their own cult, a hybridization of all the beliefs passed down through the centuries, if not millenia. The skull and bones society is probably the best evidence of oligarchy we have.
Now if you'll excuse me I have a dinner date at bohemian grove at 7:00.
Pledge allegiance to the NWO? sign me up i like wrestling! oh you mean that NWO.
Here's the thing, there has always been a new world order and always will be. The Templars started noble but were corrupted by money and power, the bavarian illuminati tried the same but disbanded, who knows what evolved into, and the freemasons, yeah sure they stick their beak here and there but don't meddle as much as conspiracy theorists think.
I read a book who simply calls TPTB as 'the cabal' who only answer to their own cult, a hybridization of all the beliefs passed down through the centuries, if not millenia. The skull and bones society is probably the best evidence of oligarchy we have.
Now if you'll excuse me I have a dinner date at bohemian grove at 7:00.
a reply to: FauxMulder
Not often you find a politician stupid enough to spill the beans about their anti America agenda but this one crawled out of the woodwork...It's just a continuation of the Obama/Clinton globalist agenda...Obama did just what she is talking about...
Not often you find a politician stupid enough to spill the beans about their anti America agenda but this one crawled out of the woodwork...It's just a continuation of the Obama/Clinton globalist agenda...Obama did just what she is talking about...
The New World Order was started in WCW and caused it to implode. McMahon after he purchased it did a couple of gimmicks with it before destroying it
since it came from his former rival company. Linda McMahon did not coin the term Eric Bishoff did. a reply to:
TerryMcGuire
a reply to: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: TerryMcGuire
edit on 19-5-2020 by CrazyFox because: added to be clear
a reply to: Vroomfondel
According to Mainstream Media, it's just a conspiracy theory. (Even though there are clear facts to show that it's not just a "theory". )
But if you wanna know whats behind this whole mess, all you gotta do is look at the jesuits and the United Nations /Lucis Trust. The same policies being implemented by the democrats are the same exact policies Alice Bailey thought up when she co founded Lucis Trust (formerly known as Lucifer's trust)
You all better watch this documentary and share it far and wide. because this conspiracy is actually happening right now under our noses.
A few years ago, Martial law was a conspiracy theory. Now take a good look at what is happening now with the plandemic. Not just a theory anymore now is it?
cheers
According to Mainstream Media, it's just a conspiracy theory. (Even though there are clear facts to show that it's not just a "theory". )
But if you wanna know whats behind this whole mess, all you gotta do is look at the jesuits and the United Nations /Lucis Trust. The same policies being implemented by the democrats are the same exact policies Alice Bailey thought up when she co founded Lucis Trust (formerly known as Lucifer's trust)
You all better watch this documentary and share it far and wide. because this conspiracy is actually happening right now under our noses.
A few years ago, Martial law was a conspiracy theory. Now take a good look at what is happening now with the plandemic. Not just a theory anymore now is it?
cheers
edit on th2020000000Wednesdayth000000Wed, 20 May 2020 04:25:50 -0500fAmerica/ChicagoWed, 20 May 2020 04:25:50 -0500 by
SoulSurfer because: (no reason given)
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
Its one thing to suspect a new world order is in the works. Its not beyond the realm of imagination, or reality for that matter. I think most people suspect something of this nature is coming sooner or later. Every once in a while some government official of some kind says something that hints strongly at a New World Order. But I have never heard it stated as plainly as this.
lin k
Of course, this comes from Chicago. Mayor Lightfoot is openly stating, "You have to mandate compliance." She is clearly stating the need to hire only people who are pledging allegiance to the NWO to run various departments and be their deputies.
Its not just an idea now. It is a plan in action to not only be part of an NWO but to hand pick government officials sympathetic to the NWO and who will enforce compliance.
You can't make this stuff up...
Yes, you do can make this stuffs up...
False and out of context: www.chicagotribune.com...[edit by]edit on 20-5-2020 by IRussao because: (no reason given)
a reply to: IRussao
This has already been addressed. Thank you for bringing it up though. In the name of transparency I try to present both sides of the coin. My beliefs are still as stated throughout this thread. Even if the mayors comments were regarding alderman privilege it is still extremely suspicious for a politician to use those three phrases, pledge allegiance to, mandatory compliance, and new world order, all in one speech. She may have been referring to alderman privilege, it may be addressing alderman privilege as part of something bigger and more sinister, or it could have been a Freudian slip.
All things considered, I think this is much more than just a new village ordinance procedure.
This has already been addressed. Thank you for bringing it up though. In the name of transparency I try to present both sides of the coin. My beliefs are still as stated throughout this thread. Even if the mayors comments were regarding alderman privilege it is still extremely suspicious for a politician to use those three phrases, pledge allegiance to, mandatory compliance, and new world order, all in one speech. She may have been referring to alderman privilege, it may be addressing alderman privilege as part of something bigger and more sinister, or it could have been a Freudian slip.
All things considered, I think this is much more than just a new village ordinance procedure.
I've long believed that TPTB have some sort of agreement with each other that their actions must take place in "plain sight."
That said, while I'm a fan of the astronomically-high occurance of things like the old Illuminati : New World Order card game predicting future events ... I really don't see any evidence for this being an actual "slip" ...
On the other hand, would They have the mayor drop this in to muddy the waters? Absolutely.
Would the mayor have dropped it in to draw the ire of some conspiracy theorists in order to give her self the out that "she has been the target of conspiracy theories"? Yeah, she seems that astute.
Who knows anymore?
That said, while I'm a fan of the astronomically-high occurance of things like the old Illuminati : New World Order card game predicting future events ... I really don't see any evidence for this being an actual "slip" ...
On the other hand, would They have the mayor drop this in to muddy the waters? Absolutely.
Would the mayor have dropped it in to draw the ire of some conspiracy theorists in order to give her self the out that "she has been the target of conspiracy theories"? Yeah, she seems that astute.
Who knows anymore?
edit on 20-5-2020 by Gryphon66 because: Noted