Unmasking names getting released...Biden is on it

a reply to: vor78
Shouldn't be determined by whining or crying.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Hunter Biden is is about to join his dad in being exposed.

www.cnbc.com...

originally posted by: proximo

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: proximo

The names on the list are those who wanted information about General Michael Flynn specifically.

Wrong. Read the top of the page at the start of the list - "Below is a list of recipients who MAY have received Lt. Gen Flynn's identity in response to a request between Nov 8 2016 and an Jan 31 2017"

When you ask to unmask something, you don't know who you are unmasking. These are just the requests for unmasking, yes we know at least one of them was the call on Flynn, but we don't know who got it.

Wow....not sure how you can be this wrong.

This is a list of solely names of requestors for ONLY Flynn unmasking. What....you think this list contains EVERY unmask request for that time period for everyone?

Deny ignorance y'all!

a reply to: shooterbrody

No, it shouldn't. But you and I both know that the Congressional GOPer, on average, has the spine of a jellyfish.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: incoserv

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: incoserv

I see you're familiar with the fallacy of argumentum ad dictionarium

Oops. Man, that was a cogent, powerful argument to your original point. You've convinced me! You should have just said that from the beginning! Thanks for pointing out facts.

What fact?

That unmasking is the end result of an official process that has been employed by the Exectuive and Leglislative Branches?

Why you're most welcome.

Way to stand up for the law.
This will age well!
Way to represent the old ats!

You were against the patriot act...weren't you?
Except against trump, right?

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: shooterbrody

Hunter Biden is is about to join his dad in being exposed.

www.cnbc.com...

Again they thought it was forgotten...
Lol

originally posted by: vor78
a reply to: shooterbrody

No, it shouldn't. But you and I both know that the Congressional GOPer, on average, has the spine of a jellyfish.

You are not wrong.

Here's the promised further information ...

From Washington Examier's Twitter acc't ...

More directly from Rand Paul ...

a reply to: shooterbrody

Humor me, try to relate this ridiculous scat to the topic of the thread and we will see.

(You apparently haven't realized that I don't respond to BS personal attacks.)

a reply to: Gryphon66
Sorry you feel your quotes are personal attacks.

You have no humor imo, so I will not indulge such.

The government spying on its citizens is bad.
ALWAYS

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: proximo

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: proximo

The names on the list are those who wanted information about General Michael Flynn specifically.

Wrong. Read the top of the page at the start of the list - "Below is a list of recipients who MAY have received Lt. Gen Flynn's identity in response to a request between Nov 8 2016 and an Jan 31 2017"

When you ask to unmask something, you don't know who you are unmasking. These are just the requests for unmasking, yes we know at least one of them was the call on Flynn, but we don't know who got it.

Wow....not sure how you can be this wrong.

This is a list of solely names of requestors for ONLY Flynn unmasking. What....you think this list contains EVERY unmask request for that time period for everyone?

Deny ignorance y'all!

Pretty sure you are the one wrong about this.

Fox news just described it as I said - this is a list of possible suspects who unmasked Flynn.

Yes, I do think this is a list of every unmask request for that time period.

The list revealed that then-U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power made unmasking requests seven times between Nov. 30, 2016 and Jan. 11, 2017. The list revealed that Clapper made three requests from Dec. 2, 2016 through Jan. 7, 2017; and that Brennan made two requests, one on Dec. 14 and one on Dec. 15, 2016. Comey also made a request on Dec. 15, 2016. On Jan. 5, 2017, McDonough made one request, and on Jan. 12, 2017, Biden made one request.

Bold is mine.

www.foxnews.com...

originally posted by: proximo

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: proximo

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: proximo

The names on the list are those who wanted information about General Michael Flynn specifically.

Wrong. Read the top of the page at the start of the list - "Below is a list of recipients who MAY have received Lt. Gen Flynn's identity in response to a request between Nov 8 2016 and an Jan 31 2017"

When you ask to unmask something, you don't know who you are unmasking. These are just the requests for unmasking, yes we know at least one of them was the call on Flynn, but we don't know who got it.

Wow....not sure how you can be this wrong.

This is a list of solely names of requestors for ONLY Flynn unmasking. What....you think this list contains EVERY unmask request for that time period for everyone?

Deny ignorance y'all!

Pretty sure you are the one wrong about this.

Fox news just described it as I said - this is a list of possible suspects who unmasked Flynn.

Yes, I do think this is a list of every unmask request for that time period.

Again....every single person on that list requested the Flynn unmask.

What they are trying to ascertain is who leaked it. Very short list of big names and at least one is the leaker.

originally posted by: carewemust
Joe Biden said on Good Morning America yesterday that he was aware of an investigation into General Flynn, but knew nothing more about it than that.

“I know nothing about those moves to investigate Michael Flynn,” --Joe Biden

originally posted by: Gryphon66
LOL ....

Comey will bring them all down (2016).

Sessions will bring them all down (2017).

Huber will bring them all down. (2018)

Durham will bring them all down. (2019)

Flynn will bring them all down. (2020).

The odds are just not in favor of the predictive abilities of some here at All Trump Supporters.

More psychological projection.

It's like y'all have no idea that you're literally speaking your mind here.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

You would be correct. The accompanying document from the NSA makes it clear that yes, this pertains only to requests to unmask Michael Flynn specifically. Read page 2:

www.grassley.senate.gov...

originally posted by: carewemust
Hunter Biden is is about to join his dad in being exposed.

www.cnbc.com...

Ha....the walls are crumbling....

originally posted by: vor78
a reply to: Vasa Croe

You would be correct. The accompanying document from the NSA makes it clear that yes, this pertains only to requests to unmask Michael Flynn specifically. Read page 2:

www.grassley.senate.gov...

I love being right.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: LSU2018

Nice ad hom argument.

I'll let you in on what the term means.

Psychological projection is a defense mechanism people subconsciously employ in order to cope with difficult feelings or emotions. Psychological projection involves projecting undesirable feelings or emotions onto someone else, rather than admitting to or dealing with the unwanted feelings.


Fits you, and other democrats, to a tee.

The debates with Trump and Biden will be so deluxe 😎