It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: watchandwait410
China could have ended the world if this was more deadly because of their incompetence. Only play with deadly viruses if you can play with them safely. If it wasn't from a lab the least they could of done was think of the world too. This was a screw you, if we go down you go down kind of thing which is messed up anyway.
Oh come on! You cannot blame China for how countries in the West handled the virus! Trump and Boris Johnson were joking about the virus when it first hit their countries. Was that China's fault that they were incompetent?
As for the virus coming from a lab, there is absolutly no evidence for that, but certain people want to believe that, that they will ignore everything else go fit their belief.
So it was fine that china stopped flights to other parts of china but allowed international fights? Wake up from your programming dude.
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: watchandwait410
China could have ended the world if this was more deadly because of their incompetence. Only play with deadly viruses if you can play with them safely. If it wasn't from a lab the least they could of done was think of the world too. This was a screw you, if we go down you go down kind of thing which is messed up anyway.
Oh come on! You cannot blame China for how countries in the West handled the virus! Trump and Boris Johnson were joking about the virus when it first hit their countries. Was that China's fault that they were incompetent?
As for the virus coming from a lab, there is absolutly no evidence for that, but certain people want to believe that, that they will ignore everything else go fit their belief.
There’s no evidence it came from the wet market, either. Just hypotheses.
Logically, I’m going with the lab that held bats for scientific research of coronavirus for $200.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: KKLOCO
This sounds like some Chinese propaganda. How much they pay them to write the article?
They were working on the same virus in the lab in Wuhan.
If it looks like 💩, smells like 💩, then it’s most certainly is 💩.
The virus was created by the Chinese, funded by the US. It’s become painfully obvious.
The peer-reviewed science is saying the virus was naturally caused. The US intelligence community has concluded that the virus has a natural origin and isn't a weapon. The CDC, and the WHO, and the German Robert Koch Institute have all reached a conclusion that the virus had a natural origin.
I'm sorry, I don't believe your President, especially when he has not presented any evidence and in light of a string of similar false, and often contradictory, pronouncements.
originally posted by: Isurrender73
a reply to: Shadys321
We have proof they said it wasn’t transferred from person to person after others found that it was. We have proof that China and WHO was against travel resrrictions.
Would you like to make any guess as to why they would do this?
China lied that’s what we know. So why should we believe them when they or their propaganda tells us it started in the wet market when we know they were researching similar things in the lab that also happens to be in Wuhan.
Where do the lies stop and the truth begin? I don’t trust our MSN or many in our government. But I most certainly trust them more than the CCP.
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: gortex
Really ,Scientific American ? I am Calling FAKE NEWS here .......
I'm sorry, I don't believe your President, especially when he has not presented any evidence and in light of a string of similar false, and often contradictory, pronouncements.
Peer reviewed science has lost its meaning
The lines of attack against the conclusions of health experts are familiar to those who have studied the climate-change denial movement, which has long relied on what Naomi Oreskes, a science historian at Harvard, called “motivated reasoning.”
“It’s, ‘I don’t like what this implies; therefore I’m going to deny the evidence, and I’m going to question the models, and I’m going to question the motivations of the people who do it,'" Dr. Oreskes said.
For instance, Todd Starnes, a conservative radio host who has likened climate change to “the Tooth Fairy,” fed the virus “truther” movement when he argued that the crisis was overstated because he did not see crowds outside the Brooklyn Hospital Center in New York. It was the pandemic-era equivalent of pointing to a snowstorm as evidence that the planet is not warming. Days later, reporting from inside the hospital found a staff overwhelmed by critical Covid cases.