FBI Set Up Michael Flynn: “What is our goal? Truth/Admission or get him to lie”?

Posted by Kemberlee Kaye Wednesday, April 29, 2020 at 9:25pm

“What is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute [him] or get him fired?”

Unsealed documents of a January 2017 interview with Michael Flynn, who was ultimately charged with making false statements to the FBI, certainly look like the entire point of the interview was “to get him to lie.”

Link

Link
...

FBI Set Up Michael Flynn: “What is our goal? Truth/Admission or get him to lie”?

Unsealed documents, which Gen. FLynn's lawyer has made available to the media, is showing more evidence that Gen. Flynn was in fact set up just so they could not only fire him, but also destroy the reputation of a war hero whom deserves better than what Comey's McCabe's FBI, and Obama officials in the DOJ, did to him.

This should have been obvious from day one. Comey himself has admitted on interviews that (and i am paraphrasing) "We did this early in the administration knowing that at any other moment, or on previous administrations this would not have happened." Comey was asked by a left-wing idiot/reporter if they had told Flynn he was being investigated, and Comey admitted they did not tell Flynn... Which made the idiot left-wing reporter laugh despite the fact that this is illegal... The police, or any LEA agency cannot lie to you and under false pretenses get you to tell them anything. Gen. Flynn even asked the FBI agents if he needed a lawyer, and they said he wasn't being investigated so he didn't need a lawyer.

We even have evidence directly from Mueller, and his team, that they threatened Gen. Flynn's son and his family if he didn't sign the admission written by the FBI...

Now we have even more evidence showing how a war hero was falsely accused of lying, when even the FBI agents told Comey and McCabe that they didn't think Gen. Flynn lied to them. But under coercion they got Gen. Flynn to admit he committed a crime which he didn't commit.

The left-wing media, left-wing leaders, and every left-winger whom has been following this story from the start should be ashamed. But many do not feel any such shame as the left has shown more than able to lie, and accuse innocent people just for being the political opposition.

This sort of treatment only happens in socialist/communist dictatorships, and that's what Obama's administration did.

Everyone involved in this should pay, which according to journalist Solomon includes Loretta Lynch knowing about this, which seems to point to Obama himself knowing about it. More so when Stzork, and his lover former FBI lawyer Lisa Page, in one of their messages stated that former President Obama wanted to be kept on the loop...

FBI texts: Obama 'wants to know everything we're doing'

So everyone from former President Obama, Comey, McCabe, Loretta Lynch, Stzork, Lisa Page, etc should be paying for destroying the lives of Gen. Flynn, and other former Trump campaign advisers whom are innocent, such as Carter Page. (no relation to Lisa Page as far as I know)

More so, Comey and McCabe, among some others, deserve a loooooooooong sentence in prison and to pay every cent Ge. Flynn/his family, and other former Trump advisors like Carter Page had to spend in lawyers. Many innocent people whom just were linked to Trump had gone bankrupt because of these false accusations in which Obama's FBI and DOJ were involved in.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

I've pointed this out for years and it needs repeating...

When Flynn came to the White House, his first goal was a complete and total audit of the Intelligence Agencies of the United States of America.

He had had run-ins with them in previous positions, were convinced they were crooked and he was going to make it right.

Our Intelligence Agencies, for the record, have not been audited since the mid-1970's.

Of course they needed him out of there.

By Any Means Necessary.

And here we are.

I'm quite tickled that Sidney Powell took on his case.

SHE knows where a lot of bodies are buried in respect to the upper echelons of our Justice system.

a reply to: Lumenari

Yep, several of us saw through the lies of the Obama administration, and FBI.

If they can do this to a federal official, whom is completely innocent, they can do this to anyone and everyone they want bankrupt/their lives destroyed.

Doesn't matter. Majority of the country don't care. When Durham indicts the media won't cover, or will claim that the Trump administration is falsely attacking these poor Obama administration people because revenge. Orange man bad is the law of the land. We have bigger problems to deal with now, like what we are going to do now that our food industry is basically destroyed. The Molch machine will continue meatgrinding the world, and people will give anything for it to save them from the threat of imagination. Trump should have just become the dictator they said he would become. Instead we just handed over our lives without a single bit of resistance. But, hey, trust the plan. The storm has arrived.

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

I've pointed this out for years and it needs repeating...

When Flynn came to the White House, his first goal was a complete and total audit of the Intelligence Agencies of the United States of America.

He had had run-ins with them in previous positions, were convinced they were crooked and he was going to make it right.

Our Intelligence Agencies, for the record, have not been audited since the mid-1970's.

Of course they needed him out of there.

By Any Means Necessary.

And here we are.

I'm quite tickled that Sidney Powell took on his case.

SHE knows where a lot of bodies are buried in respect to the upper echelons of our Justice system.

The entire stinking thing, is about to be exposed.

More will come out...

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
Comey was asked by a left-wing idiot/reporter if they had told Flynn he was being investigated, and Comey admitted they did not tell Flynn... Which made the idiot left-wing reporter laugh despite the fact that this is illegal... The police, or any LEA agency cannot lie to you and under false pretenses get you to tell them anything. Gen. Flynn even asked the FBI agents if he needed a lawyer, and they said he wasn't being investigated so he didn't need a lawyer.

While agree with most of your post I think the above quote is dangerous. Police, other LEO, or anybody else investigating is under no legal obligation to tell the truth unless they're under oath. They don't have to inform you that you're being investigated and for that reason you shouldn't talk to them without a lawyer. Flynn was sloppy and I don't want anybody here to make this mistake. This case shows how easy it is for you to be made a target. This was a miscarriage of justice and I'm glad it's coming back to the surface like many of us hoped.

Get a lawyer.

Tell your spouse, your significant other, roomate, or whoever else. If you don't protect yourself nobody will.

originally posted by: madmac5150

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

I've pointed this out for years and it needs repeating...

When Flynn came to the White House, his first goal was a complete and total audit of the Intelligence Agencies of the United States of America.

He had had run-ins with them in previous positions, were convinced they were crooked and he was going to make it right.

Our Intelligence Agencies, for the record, have not been audited since the mid-1970's.

Of course they needed him out of there.

By Any Means Necessary.

And here we are.

I'm quite tickled that Sidney Powell took on his case.

SHE knows where a lot of bodies are buried in respect to the upper echelons of our Justice system.

The entire stinking thing, is about to be exposed.

More will come out...

An FBI expert tells CNN that this is no big deal.

Greg Brower, a former US attorney and the FBI's chief congressional liaison until 2018, said that without the context around the notes, it's hard to assign any deeper meaning to them.

"To the extent this is being advertised as evidence of something nefarious, I certainly don't see it in that way," Brower said.

"I don't know what this means and I don't know that it's important at all."

More at: www.cnn.com...

It's likely that General Flynn's indictment will be thrown out by the Judge next week. (Deadline is 5/5/2020)

BUT..Until/Unless Barr-Durham begin issuing INDICTMENTS, there will always be a desire for JUSTICE to be levied against Obama, and his top people. All of them broke several U.S. Federal Laws.

originally posted by: Ksihkehe

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
Comey was asked by a left-wing idiot/reporter if they had told Flynn he was being investigated, and Comey admitted they did not tell Flynn... Which made the idiot left-wing reporter laugh despite the fact that this is illegal... The police, or any LEA agency cannot lie to you and under false pretenses get you to tell them anything. Gen. Flynn even asked the FBI agents if he needed a lawyer, and they said he wasn't being investigated so he didn't need a lawyer.

While agree with most of your post I think the above quote is dangerous. Police, other LEO, or anybody else investigating is under no legal obligation to tell the truth unless they're under oath. They don't have to inform you that you're being investigated and for that reason you shouldn't talk to them without a lawyer. Flynn was sloppy and I don't want anybody here to make this mistake. This case shows how easy it is for you to be made a target. This was a miscarriage of justice and I'm glad it's coming back to the surface like many of us hoped.

Get a lawyer.

Tell your spouse, your significant other, roomate, or whoever else. If you don't protect yourself nobody will.

I think what you meant to say is "you shouldnt be talking to them at all NO MATTER THE CIRCUMSTANCES"
Never ever has there been any good reasons to talk to police of any kind. What you say, can and will be used against you..

originally posted by: Ksihkehe
They don't have to inform you that you're being investigated

Well, apparently you are woefully misinformed... never heard of the 5th amendment, or Miranda v Arizona.

They - the FBI agents - absolutely had an absolute, legal obligation to not only inform General Flynn that he was under investigation, but to advise him that he had a Right to an Attorney being present during questioning.

A lot of people need to go down hard over this.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse
The obama administration attempted to overturn the election period.
Garbage people need sunshine.
All the crimes need to be exposed.

a reply to: carewemust

CNN.....

a reply to: tanstaafl

This.

In his position, it was not uncommon for him to have conversations with FBI agents, and the meeting they had with him where they questioned him and obtained their evidence was set up exactly like one of those routine meetings. The agents never indicated that it was anything other than one of those meetings. The was no indication they were questioning him for investigative purposes, so he did not have the chance to have his counsel present, there was no reading of rights, anything like that.

a reply to: carewemust

An FBI expert tells CNN that this is no big deal.

I think we've all learned that you can't believe or trust any representatives from the FBI, especially if they were directly hired by Comey, which Brower was.

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: Lumenari

Yep, several of us saw through the lies of the Obama administration, and FBI.

If they can do this to a federal official, whom is completely innocent, they can do this to anyone and everyone they want bankrupt/their lives destroyed.

It's not just the Obama FBI, it goes back a lot further. Hoover kept the FBI political and did tons of dirty work.

The FBI's specialty is entrapment.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

It was a Perjury Trap. Favorite tool of Prosecutors. They tried to get President Trump this way too.

If Flynn is exonerated/freed, Mueller's investigation stands a good chance of being invalidated too.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: Ksihkehe
They don't have to inform you that you're being investigated

Well, apparently you are woefully misinformed... never heard of the 5th amendment, or Miranda v Arizona.

They - the FBI agents - absolutely had an absolute, legal obligation to not only inform General Flynn that he was under investigation, but to advise him that he had a Right to an Attorney being present during questioning.

A lot of people need to go down hard over this.

Did you got your misinformation from a bunch of dumbass pundits on TV and social media? It's wrong.

There are several reasons Flynn should be exonerated and the FBI needs to be held accountable, but this isn't one of them.

Price Benowitz LLC

They may not tell you that you are being investigated for a crime or they may specifically say that you are not being investigated for a crime, but that doesn’t necessarily make it true. If the police contact you and want you to make a statement, assume that you are being investigated for a crime and contact a lawyer right away.

Bangerter Law Office

some undercover cases they are working you may not know ahead of time; everything will be done via surveillance and your indictment may be a secret until you get arrested or find out there is a warrant out for your arrest.

Also from Bangerter Law

The police are allowed to lie to you!

The Ohio and United States Supreme Courts have said so.  You can’t lie to them – you can remain silent, but cannot lie – but they can lie to you to try to get you to confess some damaging detail.

If you speak with them voluntarily, are free to leave and aren’t under arrest, any rights you have under Miranda don’t apply.  Whether they read you your rights or not, anything you say in a voluntary situation can be used against you and it is very difficult for an attorney to undo that damage.

a reply to: ketsuko

See above. While I find their lies unethical they were not illegal.

Senator Rand Paul Urges President Trump to PARDON General Flynn.

www.washingtonexaminer.com...

Should Flynn be pardoned NOW, or should the President wait until the Federal Judge renders his decision next week?

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

I've pointed this out for years and it needs repeating...

When Flynn came to the White House, his first goal was a complete and total audit of the Intelligence Agencies of the United States of America.

He had had run-ins with them in previous positions, were convinced they were crooked and he was going to make it right.

Our Intelligence Agencies, for the record, have not been audited since the mid-1970's.

Of course they needed him out of there.

By Any Means Necessary.

And here we are.

I'm quite tickled that Sidney Powell took on his case.

SHE knows where a lot of bodies are buried in respect to the upper echelons of our Justice system.

So Trump gets reelected and appoints Flynn as special council overseeing the audit of the Intelligence Agencies...Boy would that be fun...

originally posted by: carewemust

Should Flynn be pardoned NOW, or should the President wait until the Federal Judge renders his decision next week?

I would wait.... No rush

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: carewemust

Should Flynn be pardoned NOW, or should the President wait until the Federal Judge renders his decision next week?

I would wait.... No rush

Agreed. After all this time, what's a few more days. Besides, if a Judge throws Flynn's case out, he's eligible to Sue the government and the individual crooks. And Mueller's witch-hunt can be investigated as well.