WHO / CDC And The Rockefellers.

Keep seeing the corporate media lauding the 'objective' and impartial' advice of groups like the CDC and the WHO but extremely serious questions (and facts) have been raised about the background, corporate funding and agendas of these organizations.

Following on from the claims made here.

Friendly reminder: The CDC is a vaccine company. The WHO is owned by the Rockefellers. The CDC also happen to own dozens of patents for vaccines which make them and the board members respective companies billions of dollars. This is a blatant conflict of interest making everything the CDC has to tell you very questionable at any time.

The WHO has an extensive history with Rockefellers going back nearly a hundred years. The Rockefellers are no strangers to questionable atrocities, funding the Tuskeegee Experiments for example. Not an organization to simply accept information from without intense questioning.[size]
link

And amidst claims of undisclosed civil contracts and operating outside constitutional law, turns out the Centre For Disease Control is not exclusively government controlled and receives private funding through its 5013c foundation listed on the Dun & Bradstreet database - apparently 'almost all the top donors are vax producers' and it has a private lobbying arm that financially motivates politicians.

Some people have questioned my concern over both the CDC and John Hopkins University is a PRIVATE organization where the CDC accepts private funding – NOT ONLY GOVERNMENT! The CDC is quasi-government under the Department of Health and Human Services which strangely has sources of funding that are predicated on the fact that it also has a private 501(c)(3) public charity, like the Clinton Foundation.

link

Call me cynical but when it comes to claims of protecting public health then I suppose this raises obvious questions about credibilty, collusion and 'for profit' agendas - especially considering the CDC's alignment with pharmaceutical cartels.

From what I've read the Rockefeller Family play a huge role and are involved in the formation, backing and/or potential control of everything from AMA, FDA, CDC and WHO right through to Monsanto and the Bildeberg Steering Committee.

• Do find it interesting that there's never any mention of these guys on the MSM - are there any investigative journalists actually left or is it now all just 'public relations'?


Articles:


• WHO: Apparently the Rockefellers 'profoundly shaped WHO and maintain long and complex relations with it'.

In recent years, there has been a growing debate about what role foundations should play in global health governance generally, and particularly vis-à-vis the World Health Organization (WHO). Much of this discussion revolves around today's gargantuan philanthropy, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and its sway over the agenda and modus operandi of global health.

Yet such pre-occupations are not new. The Rockefeller Foundation (RF), the unparalleled 20th century health philanthropy heavyweight, both profoundly shaped WHO and maintained long and complex relations with it, even as both institutions changed over time.

Backstage: The Relationship Between the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Health Organization

• Pharmaceutical / financial interest:

The Rockefeller empire, in tandem with Chase Manhattan Bank (now JP Morgan Chase), owns over half of the pharmaceutical interests in the United States. It is the largest drug manufacturing combine in the world.

Since WWII, the pharmaceutical industry has steadily netted increasing profits to become the world's second largest manufacturing industry after the arms industry.

link

• Good vid from 'The Corbert Report' exploring how the Rockefellers operate within medicine (and their funding of Eugenic ideologies).

.How the modern medical paradigm came together in the early 20th century, courtesy of the Rockefeller Foundation and their cronies.

link

• Media/academic censorship

Since the mass media and professional journals censor these arguments, the vast majority of doctors and scientists, although decent people who want to do the right thing, yet don’t have the power to expose those behind the medical crimes.

They therefore accept the biased conclusions of politicized bureaucracies like the American Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the World Health organization (WHO), whose coziness with the drug industry and the media is legendary and whose recommendations always seem to dovetail perfectly with drug industry marketing plans.

As far as the America Rockefeller Foundation is concerned we described them as: “A Mafioso Family In Sheep’s Clothing”

CDC and WHO” Alias The Rockefeller Foundation

Also thought the presentation about Rockefeller motivations from OnWhiteMar's thread was quite a fascinating one (disturbing endgame though) and basically charts their use of financial coercion and board member insertion in order to steer policy towards a specific long term objective.

• Gates:

When it comes to cousin Bill (father also involved in Eugenics) then suppose it's relevant that he's now the worlds biggest WHO contributor - also serious concerns raised over his 'distortion of research priorities' and his money 'serving as a Trojan horse for corporate interests' - some relevant info here about past vaccinations activities.

• Also, when it comes to buying claims of 'corporate philanthropy', there's a good analysis here of inherent 'corporate psychopathy'.


• Conspiracy theory:

Corporate media claims of 'fact checking' just word play using semantics and technicalities.

Aaron Russo's last interview - Rockefeller informed him a long time ago about plans for global technocratic enslavement:

See 29:50

Relevant quote:

"Their plan is to change society in every country in a way that provides them a reason to impose a world government. The creation of a world central bank and an electronic world currency, in conjunction with the elimination of cash, would allow them complete control to dictate financial policy around the globe. Their policies would be enforced by their world army, and a micro-chipped population would live in fear of having their electronic currency deleted if they ever crossed the world government"

Charlie Robinson, in his book "The Octopus of Global Control", 2017

Statements

a reply to: karl 12

Thank you so much for putting this post together.

I did a deep dive into the beginnings of the AMA and the ACS in America years ago when my wife got cancer and I was confused on where they were going with her treatment.

I didn't know that when I started the dive that I would be going back 100 years and how horrifying our current medical model is.

I didn't delve into it any further because I was just concerned about my wife's health at the time.

Your OP seems to fill in the gaps from where I stopped and what else I need to know.

Going through the videos now and thank you SO much again for putting the OP together.

S&F.

a reply to: karl 12

The pharmaceutical-industrial complex is here.

Drug companies pay doctors, people get addicted, people go to hospital because of an overdose, hospitals buy remedies-drug companies keep wanting people to get sick.

As they say, money is the root of all evil.

The World Health Organization said today that antibody tests are virtually worthless.

Naturally the mainstream media is broadcasting this, hoping that medical people will stop administering antibody tests.

originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: karl 12
As they say, money is the root of all evil.

No. Money is just a tool. Like a gun.

Irrational lust for money, and subsequently, power, is the root of all evil.

originally posted by: carewemust
The World Health Organization said today that antibody tests are virtually worthless.

Well... not exactly.

They said they were "basically useless when it comes to proving immunity"... which is based on a 'possibility' that the antibodies may provide little or no 'immunity'...

Naturally the mainstream media is broadcasting this, hoping that medical people will stop administering antibody tests.

I think its too late, that can of worms is now open for all to see...

a reply to: karl 12

I want to echo Lum's thanks above. This is one of my wife's pet research projects, in fact, I'm going to share this OP with her...thank you.

Great research here, thanks OP!

Unprecedented times, lets ask the hard questions.

People say "trust the experts".
Well here is one of those experts saying back
in January there was no problem.

twitter.com... ationalfile.com%2Fpresident-trump-vs-bill-gates-on-treatment-fauci-has-a-100-million-conflict-of-interest%2F

People need to look at Fauci and ask hard questions.

www.holycross.edu...

Who is he? What are his ties to Bill Gates?
To the Rockefeller family?

What is the nature of the Rockefeller's
relationship to The WHO?

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

What is Bill Gates most recent patent for?
WO2020060606 - CRYPTOCURRENCY SYSTEM USING BODY ACTIVITY DATA

patentscope.wipo.int...

More on that data mining using body activity patent:
news.bitcoin.com...

Where is this all headed?

From the looks of the latest numbers, the "Covid 19" virus
was circulating far before there was even data out of
China. The hospitals were not overwhelmed then, they
are not now. Why was the worldwide economy shut down
over this? Yes I have a lot of questions, and it seems
there are no good answers.

S&F

The WHO has an extensive history with Rockefellers going back nearly a hundred years.

Okay... sure.

"The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nation..."
UN operations begin:    24 October 1945
WHO established:           7 April 1948

 2020
-1945
     75 years

I'm no fan of the Rockefellers or WHO, but some things just make ya go, "hmmm."

edit: Excellent compilation of information, none the less!
Kudos

a reply to: karl 12

This is a interesting read from the Rockerfeller foundation 10 years ago,,,, Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development

Lock step ?? LOCK STEP – A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback

www.academia.edu... opment_


This was in 2010

Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers

China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.

a reply to: stonerwilliam

Appreciate the replies - this really is a deep warren but a lot does (seem to) keep coming back to the Bilderberg group.

Also bizarre and disturbing things like 'zero growth' societies and 'crypto-eugenics'.

"They had to pursue a strategy … called “crypto-eugenics.” In essence, “You seek to fulfill the aims of eugenics without disclosing what you are really aiming at and without mentioning the word.” This is how the Eugenics Society conceived of its funding for the IPPF.

– Matthew Connelly, Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population

a reply to: karl 12

If I may; I’m asking permission to run with this thread and try to get it in a “large print” article...... only with your consent of course. As you know this site is an amazing place to share information with the “like minded”, but that is where our fight dies. Because it is the other side that needs to see, read, hear this for themselves..... time is of the essence and I could care less of the repercussions; I live and die by the true meaning of freedom and what it emits. Thank you for a wonderful post

a reply to: burntheships
a reply to: stonerwilliam

Thanks for those links.

Looks like there's also very close connections between the FDA, the Rockefellers and Monsanto.

Monsanto also has extremely close connections to the German company Bayer (they once merged to form Mobay) and that's interesting as Bayer were once part of I.G.Farben.

I.G. Farbenindustrie AG - German Industry and the Holocaust

Basically the conglomerate was broken up into its original three major component parts – Bayer, BASF, and Hoechst – whose balance sheet by the end of the 1950’s already exceeded that of the original IGF.

Holocaust Education & Archive Research Team

The Nazi connection is interesting because the subject of Eugenics (crypto or otherwise) often seems to pop up when looking into the Rockefellers (and Gates).

• Bayer also has very close connections to the WHO and China.

Also looks like 'Johnson and Johnson' just recently landed a one billion dollar U.S.Goverment deal to 'boost Corona vaccine capacity'.

Could be nothing but did find it interesting that one of J&J's top five shareholders once served as Chairman at Bayer and is also on the board at Microsoft.


a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

No worries, do what you want with it mate.

a reply to: karl 12

Don't leave the RAND corporation out of the research
and development of theories here

rand

This page is about their funding and who they provide advice to ,
Including , you guessed it , bill and Melinda's foundation , the Rockefeller Foundation , various big pharma's , all sorts , including NHS England , the UK department of health and social care , the world bank , etc etc.

Have to moderate some things I come out with , so not forgetting the stability that steering groups might provide , the ability they have to coordinate efforts , the world can benefit from reasoned approaches coming from intelligent analyses which informed sources are enabled to create.

It's not necessarily all bad , though we do get a cold sense of steely corporate power that no one can change.

What Jesus said , what profiteth a man if he gain the world but loses his own soul ?
That's the danger they're in , if they're playing evil unjust unequal games ,like so many do, then let life teach them a lesson they won't forget .

a reply to: karl 12

No investigative journalism on TV at all. Simply programming and propaganda. The fox watching the hen house.

a reply to: burntheships

Well mate if this guy's legit then here's another very disturbing connection:

"Dr. Lawrence Dunegan served as Medical Director of Planned Parenthood Federation of America at Mount Sinai Medical School in New York"

Mount Sinai School features heavily in the Gates family and the father of Bill Gates was heavily involved in 'Planned Parenthood' (formerly the American Eugenics Society') - phrases like 'reckless breeders', 'human weeds' and Kissenger's 'useless eaters' spring to mind.


Lecture:

Recollections of Dr. Lawrence Dunegan regarding a lecture he attended on March 20, 1969 at a meeting of the Pittsburgh Paediatric Society. The lecturer at that gathering of paediatricians (identified in tape three recorded in 1991) was a Dr. Richard Day

Predictions (viewer discretion)

When talking about changes in medical care, Dr Day said   “…there would be new diseases to appear which had not ever been seen before. Would be very difficult to diagnose and be untreatable – at least for a long time.”

Link 1 / 2

If this is true, and i'm believing it is! all i can say is "wow" there is so much messed up stuff going on in the world we may never know how much the super rich are involved in screwing us plebs. keep us busy over here while they are doing somthing over there! I believe somthing bigger is going on while we are focused on the kungflu, I'm kinda nervous about the future. i mean this is pretty obvious to anyone with an IQ over 70

a reply to: karl 12

This is an excellent summary about the nefarious development of "Rockefeller Medicine", you know what I like to say, once a snake oil salesman always a snake oil salesman.

These people are truly sick, they are the backbone of the Vaccine Damage that we have seen for decades and people are beyond ignorant to not question such organizations.

The defunding of the WHO is on par with the take over of the FED by the treasury.

Thank you or the work you put into this!

a reply to: karl 12

Your thread is educational karl, it shoots right to the heard of the octopus that controls the Western world.
From watching the final video from your OP it is clear that the Rockefeller came from snake oil stock who quickly by the next generation turned into profiteers. With the advent of the industrial revolution and the oil to run it the wealth and power to be accumulated far outstripped what had gone before and the Rockefellers stepped in and made it their own.

But here's the thing Karl, here is my question. So what?

We can see that from early on the suppression of the entire oil industry by the David Rockefeller was evident to all that were involved in that industry. That they saw him and his company as a snake should never be forgotten, But it was. Over the following two decades they had come to control both oil and much of the railroad industry.

Roosevelt broke up Standard into smaller companies but like the Terminator 2, it only took a while before it consolidated once again. The lessons of that time were lost, but the problems remained and grew.

Then of course there was Marxism. Marxism pointed directly to those cabals and monopolies as the fruit of unchecked capitalism. Yet because Marxism turned into Leninism and turned into Stalinist those things that Marx's critique of capitalism was washed over by it's failure to get out that message due to the authoritarianism of communist regimes.

Meanwhile, all those elitists within the capitalist system continued to gather more and more control until we see what he have today.

So are we today to believe that the progeny of a snake oil salesman are really the benefactors of a better world for all of us? Surely not. So where does that leave us. With a world that is run by a multi tentacled beast that without which the whole structure would collapse.

This gets me to my final question. We can see how the corporate octopus was put back in it's cage for a few decades by Roosevelt. But it emerged again and when it's power had gained enough to enter the White House again it chose Reagan who removed most of the remaining regulations on it's growth. This was followed by Clinton who removed what restrictions there were on media ownership, making way for those very corporations to buy up and control the vast majority of media in this country. That wasn't my question, but this is.

At one point in that final video it mentions that these corporate billionaire types. these types who have played the economic system to their own benefit , will come into government for a spell and then go back out again into the private sector, that is if we can even determine a difference at this point. So why do you think that so many people believe that Trump is any different? Was he not rich enough or controlling enough to make anyone believe that he is not of the same mentality as the others?

Do we not see that so much of his economic programs benefit corporations, the tax breaks, the monies from this recent bailout? I just don't get it how so many still believe that he, Trump, is on the side of us working folk.

I think my question was in there somewhere.

a reply to: tanstaafl

I disagree. Yes, money is a tool. More of a measurement tool though. It's a man made form of making trade more realistic and efficient as well as measuring purchasing power. And the more purchasing power one has. Most usually, there is a direct correlation to how much freedom one has, in our society. More freedom, more potential for power over others.

Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Very rarely, if ever, will someone in our society obtain power without money as an influence.

With money (monetary economics) comes many abhorrent behaviors as well, generally spawned from the illusion of scarcity and social stratification.

Greed, poverty, corruption, war, (most) crime, hunger, homelessness, etc. are all symptoms of monetary economics. No matter if it is employed through capitalist, communist or socialist controls

You also seem to suggest that only "evil" people do "evil" things.

Nature vs nurture. I am very certain that those who grow up surrounded by "evil" negative environments, will eventually emulate those and become the not so upstanding citizens we would hope them to be.

Hitler wasn't born as who we know him to be. And Ghandi wasn't born as we know him to be. They developed into the people we know them as based on the environments the grow up and developed in.

So yes, money, it seems is in fact the root of mostly all evil in this world. Not to say that there wouldn't be a potential for such behavior without money, but I'm very sure it would be dramatically diminished.