Facebook the new arm of the state

originally posted by: SailorJerry

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: American-philosopher

I agree with Zuckerberg.

There is no moderation, fact-checking or control over the truthfulness of Facebork posts. None.

Consequently, there is a large volume of outright lies posted on Facebork and it is being used for political propaganda.

The fact that Brexit is going ahead and Trump was elected shows the power of social media to influence public opinion.

Facebork should not be taken seriously and is not a platform for petition because content can be changed without audit and there is no verification of factuality.

LoL Is this a joke post?

What size jackboot do you wear? They are going to need your sizes for your new uniforms , of COURSE you dont like anything that has the freedom to post anything they want and let the people decide for themselves whats truth and whats not

And of COURSE you like a platform that controls the information, you know, for those people too stupid to think for themselves.

Hope you have your salute down

How can you get everything so wrong?

I, and Zuckerberg, are saying that you SHOULDN'T use social media for serious political engagement.

We are saying you can't trust social media.

originally posted by: SailorJerry
a reply to: chr0naut

CNN gets raked over the coals by its opposition if it makes a mistake or gives out false information.

Some poster on social media tells a lie, no one gives a @#$%.

Random posters on FB are not media pundits and "reporters" tasked (use to be) with bringing the TRUTH and holding others accountable THROUGH that news when they lie

Now the media is IN on it

What a piss poor example, and thoroughly exposes your thought process

PS none of us are surprised

LOL.

But what we have here in the case of Facebook, is maybe not a king but certainly a ''town square'' that owned by a single landlord, Zukerberg. It is his company, it is his platform and he, according to the rights allowed him under the constitution can do whatever he wants with that platform.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

THis is perfect my friend made this same argument to me today. He said facebook is Zuckerberg's property. My counter is that when facebook decides to trade in user's information and give it to thrid parties that to me is rent/mortgage. And therefore to me users of facebooks are tenants. and tenants are deserving of some rights. Facebook does not exist without users. much like a landlord does not exist without tenants.

a reply to: olaru12

Zuckerberg can run his bussiness the way he wants, But I dont know if he should be able to infringe on peoples rights. I mean if you have private property or a bussiness does that automatically mean that you lose all your rights??

originally posted by: American-philosopher
a reply to: olaru12

Zuckerberg can run his bussiness the way he wants, But I dont know if he should be able to infringe on peoples rights. I mean if you have private property or a bussiness does that automatically mean that you lose all your rights??

Business owners can do whatever they want.

If a bakery doesn't want to make a wedding cake for a gay wedding then they-. . . . wait, what?

a reply to: DBCowboy

whoa are you like the one liner all star of ATS? I saw you had a birthday right??

a reply to: American-philosopher

a reply to: grey580

70+ years of coronaviruses, and never has a successful vaccine been created..... how long would you like to wait?

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Breakthestreak

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
“Damn facebook, we should have state sponsored television shows (with ZERO controls over what is ‘truth’) and nothing else. That way, cNn would still be in control and we wouldn’t have had Brexit”

Ha ha haaa. Exposed.

Your head of state has repeatedly called CNN fake news. You seem confused as to whom the state sponsored media would be.

Well (according to YOU) it would be hilary Clinton because President Trump only won because of facebook

(Deluded mindset that is)

Hillary didn't win. Being deluded is living as if she did.

Being deluded is thinking that President Trump won because of facebook

And being a piece of shiit is wanting facebook to censor certain people’s opinions and views

Nvm

a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

I never said it would be easy. You're right that there have been problems in the past with vaccines for the type of virus.

However reading immunologists discuss this they think it's possible that an imperfect vaccine is possible. One that could possibly be a short term medicine that could boost your immune system and prevent people from dying but not provide immunity.

Hopefully they can overcome the problems they had with the SARS vaccine.

Well the CCP style is not a surprice

Why Is Mark Zuckerberg Giving Communist Propaganda to Facebook Staff?


Facebook is making employees read Chinese propaganda to impress Beijing

Twitter



You must commit yourself to the party ..er..i mean facebook .

originally posted by: Breakthestreak

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Breakthestreak

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
“Damn facebook, we should have state sponsored television shows (with ZERO controls over what is ‘truth’) and nothing else. That way, cNn would still be in control and we wouldn’t have had Brexit”

Ha ha haaa. Exposed.

Your head of state has repeatedly called CNN fake news. You seem confused as to whom the state sponsored media would be.

Well (according to YOU) it would be hilary Clinton because President Trump only won because of facebook

(Deluded mindset that is)

Hillary didn't win. Being deluded is living as if she did.

Being deluded is thinking that President Trump won because of facebook

And being a piece of shiit is wanting facebook to censor certain people’s opinions and views

Why would anyone WANT to be on facebook? No one has ever really been able to explain that.

originally posted by: Breakthestreak

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Breakthestreak

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
“Damn facebook, we should have state sponsored television shows (with ZERO controls over what is ‘truth’) and nothing else. That way, cNn would still be in control and we wouldn’t have had Brexit”

Ha ha haaa. Exposed.

Your head of state has repeatedly called CNN fake news. You seem confused as to whom the state sponsored media would be.

Well (according to YOU) it would be hilary Clinton because President Trump only won because of facebook

(Deluded mindset that is)

Hillary didn't win. Being deluded is living as if she did.

Being deluded is thinking that President Trump won because of facebook

And being a piece of shiit is wanting facebook to censor certain people’s opinions and views

I don't want Facebork to censor anyone, I want people to stop putting their trust into something that is for light entertainment.

originally posted by: sine.nomine
I thought it was made extremely clear in like 04/05 thay Facebook is a scam. Jesus you people still use that sh!t?

Yeah. Apparently so.

a reply to: chr0naut

You, uh, realize Facebook is an advertising platform designed to drive engagement for money, right? They have some of the largest data centers in the world and their main focus is gaming out how they can get you and me and everyone else to scroll and click, endlessly, in a neverending process they call "engagement."

That's what the world is up against. Do you think asking folks to treat it like light entertainment is reasonable at this point?

You are so afraid, so much so you’ve given up your ability to reason and beg for the state to lead you.

a reply to: grey580

a reply to: Rob808

uh huh.

Tell yourself whatever you need to.

I don't know if you've ever been hospitalized. But I have twice with week stays each time. It sucks and I don't want to go back a third time to rack up more hospital bills if I don't need to.

But you go do you. Hopefully you don't get sick and end up like this guy.

originally posted by: 0zzymand0s
a reply to: chr0naut

You, uh, realize Facebook is an advertising platform designed to drive engagement for money, right? They have some of the largest data centers in the world and their main focus is gaming out how they can get you and me and everyone else to scroll and click, endlessly, in a neverending process they call "engagement."

That's what the world is up against. Do you think asking folks to treat it like light entertainment is reasonable at this point?

The people have been well trained if they now trust an advertising platform, with no veracity over what is presented.

Let's ask Hamburglar about what he thinks...

originally posted by: 0zzymand0s
a reply to: chr0naut

You, uh, realize Facebook is an advertising platform designed to drive engagement for money, right? They have some of the largest data centers in the world and their main focus is gaming out how they can get you and me and everyone else to scroll and click, endlessly, in a neverending process they call "engagement."

That's what the world is up against. Do you think asking folks to treat it like light entertainment is reasonable at this point?

I have ads on FB. How else do you think I could reach such a receptive audience for my "services"?

No one is forcing anyone to get a FB account. Or twitter, or any of the other 65, social media sites.

makeawebsitehub.com...