It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
More at: thehill.com...
The New York Times is facing blowback after its executive editor admitted to removing a controversial passage in a story focusing on a 1993 sexual assault allegation against presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.
The criticism comes after the Times published an article looking into allegations made against Biden by Tara Reade, who says the then-senator sexually assaulted her when she worked as a Biden senate staffer.
“The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden, beyond the hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable,” read the original passage in a Sunday story....before it was removed.
Times executive editor Dean Baquet told the news organization’s media columnist Ben Smith that the edit was made because the Biden campaign argued the phrasing made it appear that other women had made similar accusations against Biden.
“The [Biden] campaign thought that the phrasing was awkward and made it look like there were other instances in which he had been accused of sexual misconduct,” Baquet told Smith.
Smith also raised questions about whether Biden was being treated differently in the Times coverage than Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who faced allegations of sexual assault during his confirmation process in 2018.
originally posted by: carewemust
Tuesday, April 14, 2020
A few days ago, the New York Times found and reported that Democratic Presidential Nominee JOE BIDEN made some women and little girls feel a tad uncomfortable with his touching, rubbing, kissing and sniffing.
But after the Biden campaign asked the New York Times to re-examine their findings, the news organization refined their report to clear and exonerate Joe Biden completely, totally, and absolutely.
More at: thehill.com...
The New York Times is facing blowback after its executive editor admitted to removing a controversial passage in a story focusing on a 1993 sexual assault allegation against presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.
The criticism comes after the Times published an article looking into allegations made against Biden by Tara Reade, who says the then-senator sexually assaulted her when she worked as a Biden senate staffer.
“The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden, beyond the hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable,” read the original passage in a Sunday story....before it was removed.
Times executive editor Dean Baquet told the news organization’s media columnist Ben Smith that the edit was made because the Biden campaign argued the phrasing made it appear that other women had made similar accusations against Biden.
“The [Biden] campaign thought that the phrasing was awkward and made it look like there were other instances in which he had been accused of sexual misconduct,” Baquet told Smith.
Smith also raised questions about whether Biden was being treated differently in the Times coverage than Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who faced allegations of sexual assault during his confirmation process in 2018.
So now that Joe Biden has the sexual impropriety allegations behind him, he can focus on clearing his name of whatever "baseless accusations" come out of Senator Ron Johnson's (R-Wi) report on Hunter/Joe Biden Corruption. The report is expected to be released this Summer.
MORE INFO: nypost.com...
-CareWeMust
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: ZapBrannigan3030
Still a few more hurdles to overcome....but Biden is well on his way to being squeaky clean in the eyes of American voters.
originally posted by: madmac5150
originally posted by: carewemust
Tuesday, April 14, 2020
A few days ago, the New York Times found and reported that Democratic Presidential Nominee JOE BIDEN made some women and little girls feel a tad uncomfortable with his touching, rubbing, kissing and sniffing.
But after the Biden campaign asked the New York Times to re-examine their findings, the news organization refined their report to clear and exonerate Joe Biden completely, totally, and absolutely.
More at: thehill.com...
The New York Times is facing blowback after its executive editor admitted to removing a controversial passage in a story focusing on a 1993 sexual assault allegation against presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden.
The criticism comes after the Times published an article looking into allegations made against Biden by Tara Reade, who says the then-senator sexually assaulted her when she worked as a Biden senate staffer.
“The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden, beyond the hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable,” read the original passage in a Sunday story....before it was removed.
Times executive editor Dean Baquet told the news organization’s media columnist Ben Smith that the edit was made because the Biden campaign argued the phrasing made it appear that other women had made similar accusations against Biden.
“The [Biden] campaign thought that the phrasing was awkward and made it look like there were other instances in which he had been accused of sexual misconduct,” Baquet told Smith.
Smith also raised questions about whether Biden was being treated differently in the Times coverage than Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who faced allegations of sexual assault during his confirmation process in 2018.
So now that Joe Biden has the sexual impropriety allegations behind him, he can focus on clearing his name of whatever "baseless accusations" come out of Senator Ron Johnson's (R-Wi) report on Hunter/Joe Biden Corruption. The report is expected to be released this Summer.
MORE INFO: nypost.com...
-CareWeMust
So... they read Joe's "wikipedia" page, and called it good.
Sounds about right.
originally posted by: ZapBrannigan3030
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: ZapBrannigan3030
Still a few more hurdles to overcome....but Biden is well on his way to being squeaky clean in the eyes of American voters.
Now he just needs a rock solid VP.
It has to be a woman, at least 30 years his younger, nice hair with notes of pineapple and lavender. She also needs to be strong, strong enough to be comfortable with a few gropes and sniffs on the campaign trail. Minorities a plus.
She needs to be strong, but submissive....ability to carry a 10lb gym bag into a secluded room a plus.
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: carewemust
Once again, the 'choices' for the highest office in the land are way short of what one would expect from a nation of 330 million citizens.
Don't you think that something's fishy here?
originally posted by: madmac5150
Joe Biden could throw a saddle on the back of a naked 14 year old, ride her into D.C. and the press would spin it like this:
"Future President enlists a young patriotic feminist, to carry his message to the Beltway."
originally posted by: madmac5150
Joe Biden could throw a saddle on the back of a naked 14 year old, ride her into D.C. and the press would spin it like this:
"Future President enlists a young patriotic feminist, to carry his message to the Beltway."
originally posted by: Guiltyguitarist
Now is not the time to take the high road. If we don’t act as belligerent as the dems did with kavanaugh, then we deserve what we get. Shove this down their hypocritical, pencil necked throats
originally posted by: ZapBrannigan3030
originally posted by: madmac5150
Joe Biden could throw a saddle on the back of a naked 14 year old, ride her into D.C. and the press would spin it like this:
"Future President enlists a young patriotic feminist, to carry his message to the Beltway."
The only mistake you made was excluding the word "again". We all know he's saddled up a 14 year old at some point in his career.