It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
If they are out of work.then they are certainly a lower earner then. Makes the point about a proper social safety net even better thank you.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
And still not a general food shortage.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: ScepticScot
If they are out of work.then they are certainly a lower earner then. Makes the point about a proper social safety net even better thank you.
What happens when there are not enough high earners to pay for the living expenses of the low earners?
This is the problem with ism...
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: ScepticScot
...and who, pray, is going to pay for this social net??
When many/most of the tax paying folks are not working, thus unable to pay those taxes that fund the social net??
As for the no general shortage of food?? The operative word, at this point in time, is "yet"...
Local news channels broadcast seemingly never-ending lines of cars filled with hungry families, many of whom are sent home when the food bank runs out o
The San Antonio Food Bank is in dire need of monetary donations and volunteers as demand on its food stock has doubled during the COVID-19 outbreak.
More than 900 people showed up at the church parking lot where the group had moved its operations to accommodate social distancing, but the pantry only had food for the first 330 in line.
The food bank’s warehouse has roughly six weeks of supplies, but there are concerns about what’s next.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: ScepticScot
And still not a general food shortage.
Degrees of government-manufactured hardship are now being measured by you.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
You claimed food shortages would lead to anarchy.
Still not seen any evidence of food shortages beyond short term affect of panic buying. Zero anarchy (or at least no more than normal).
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: ScepticScot
You claimed food shortages would lead to anarchy.
You referring to my conversation with the other poster?
Still not seen any evidence of food shortages beyond short term affect of panic buying. Zero anarchy (or at least no more than normal).
Most likely because you haven't read the articles. But at this point I don't expect you too.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: ScepticScot
And still not a general food shortage.
Degrees of government-manufactured hardship are now being measured by you.
You claimed food shortages would lead to anarchy.
Still not seen any evidence of food shortages beyond short term affect of panic buying. Zero anarchy (or at least no more than normal).
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: ScepticScot
And still not a general food shortage.
Degrees of government-manufactured hardship are now being measured by you.
You claimed food shortages would lead to anarchy.
Still not seen any evidence of food shortages beyond short term affect of panic buying. Zero anarchy (or at least no more than normal).
That was my post. And I was not referring to intermittent shortages. I was referring to starvation and the unavailable of food.
I know you don't like to read, but try "9 meals to Anarchy"
originally posted by: Kenzo
The killer pandemic....
FROM THE NUMBERS: Only 150 Americans to Date With No Pre-Existing Conditions Have Died From the Coronavirus or 0.9%
originally posted by: ScepticScot
The articles about food banks....
Think we have covered that.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Xtrozero
Was that 200 in one dollar denomination?
What kind of strip clubs you think I go to? The ones with the free buffet?
You're right....
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: ScepticScot
...and when there isn't enough for me to be charitable, because I don't have enough for me?? It's reached that point for far too many, already.
What then??
Odds are very good that it won't reach that point, but given the level of hysteria, it wouldn't overly surprise me, either.
I am, after all, something of a pessimist