Reply to Response #1
Peter had a Wife, the circumstances of that are not clear. He also fell on the wrong side of things with God and Denied Jesus, he
also repeated fell on the wrong side of things, when God showed him this earth's chakra network was not good, with the vision of "unclean animals
genetic lines descending", he once again rebuked God.
Paul had a Wife, the circumstances of that are not clear. He was blinded, or ascended to heaven. The Jews specifically were his
enemies, in their uncleanness, and those genetic lines, as it is recorded Paul always won against the barbarians.
.................
.................
.................
People Considered "Pyramid Builders" or, "Sons of Man in the New Testament" ........ came out of the old testament ......... in the old testament, I
don't think they were born from a womb or were table to take wives .......... (moses is an example, but there are others) ............ God wrestled
with the giving of the written law by allowing different people to record it, and that fell into some degree of corruption, what we have today is very
close to the truth but probably not the, complete and unedited "truth".
God only considers individuals tied to the "pyramid builder" argument, associated with a "unified field" of some degree. Outside of God's angels,
that is basically it, this is not apart of prophets, visioneers, soothsayers, or prophecies necessarily. The arguments are more clear for the "son of
man" generationally then it is for other individuals, some fall short, and that is typically by choice. God doesn't allow mankind to dictate his
gospel or his "covenants", at best mankind suffers, "pain for pain" in its falsehood, until god invalidates that argument.
Reply to Response #2
Nostradamus is recorded to have had an office with more than one wife (polygamy). Depends on the situation but generally:::
consider this:::depending on when:::this is a grey area:::
He would of never left the planet earth, he would of had considerable strength to understand whatever he published with accuracy to rival anything
published today. But he would of also understood the cyclical behavior. His choices in contending with god, over his testimony or being tied to this
earth with wives, removes in a way what god originally planned for the sons of man.
Like with Issac Newton, we know, he may of been tied to this earth, history does not give a clear answer on the subject.
There are individuals (sons of man in the new testament), that crossed the galaxies, the voynich manuscript is such a publication, but history doesn't
usually rebuke the state of mankind.
Generally speaking....people will die from god using an angel for the "son of man", or depending on the rate of suicide in man's pleasure, man is
killed many times more in its uncleanness with the son of man (like coronavirus), God will give the "son of man" some power for example. That doesn't
have to be used at all, further more someone like Edward Leedskalnin could focus his strength by choice on this earth, in trying to be faithful and
that will fail, and result in some controversy for pleasure with satan like WW1 and WW2............then if he Claims his Choices removed God's
interests on the matter, and killed his wife, and left him "grounded", not necessarily from "polygamy" but history is unclean then, we have a glimpse
of the truth.
this is where the word "succubus" originates, those are the wives (polygamy), that generally live on in those failed relationships with, people
identifying with the "pyramid builder" argument god has afforded, not necessarily a son of man. they never obtained the full truth and eventually
become murderers................out of curiosity or murder, we can see those persons, on either side of the argument, have an interest in the "son of
man", during this generation, but generally not in a faithful way. and its never important, either an angel kills them, or god gives the person in
view to make the choice.
what nostradamus wrote about "antichrist", is not some magical name or an angel, in the new testament ........... these systems have been
in play for a while and are derived ........... nostradamus materials generally apply to "pyramid builders" (sons of man in the new testament)
............. not one particular individual is in view .............. however people also read the material as progressive, that is the very last
generation ..... and then one individual in this argument, most likely moses.
(Nguyen Van Lem, Nasa's Moon Shard, Star Trek, etc. ................. Nguyen Van Lem played both cards, and wrestled with god over this earth
specifically ............. something the "son of man" that is tied to this cycle of halley's comet, or the last generation, is not doing. "dead or
alive" mankind does not make these kinds of choices, god doesn't look for an answer there, what we have is, "pain for pain", and a straight death for
satan for mankind in its uncleanness at this stage.............furthermore, they are not longer learning, but I have constructed the argument to make
this more coherent)
(this can only be resolved with examples, and with proper explanation of the "unified field" relation to humanity as basic design trait and not for
all genetic lines, not on this planet, and maybe some ties on mars, if everything is still there in some working order .............. this
controversy over "polygamy" will be a basic right for some males, the government will fund that, the controversy with me wresting with god, or with
"polygamy" doesn't exist, only god's allowances for beating on the body of moses, this will be resolved soon, either with some alloted strength from
god for moses, or the natural way, god resolving this off world) (god's answer was for "jupiter" in the new testament .............. there is nothing
anybody can do to impact my choice with god, so we'll be seeing mankind suffer for perhaps a few more months only)
(individuals, the family, choice ................ god making complete provision for the family of the "son of man", does not factor in the
general understanding of Nostradamus or other materials, that is a mistake, and this will also be resolved soon)
bottom line (moses whoever he is, will live and die with nothing appearing to happen, he will have a family, and come from an unknown place and nobody
will understand how that happend, until a proper explanation is given .......... god making provision for the family ......... without involving this
earth)
God is not making payment for humanities sin on the "dead flesh issue", you do not have a "unified field" on earth, and no legal attachment with god
for an individual. God will act for my sake, and, the natural position is nothing. Humanity has nothing from God and the son of man is resolved off
world.............God has become more clear about this position............the difference is mankind's propensity for suicide and the son of man
wrestling with that, and when that does not happen, things become more clear, and that is what is happening now. (all of these contrary claims, and
historicaly inaccuracies will be cleared up soon).
When this is resolved, God's Mercies, will be the mechanism for your controversy, even if man falls short, that is also the natural end of mankind,
with god saving only a few individuals from generation to generation
edit on 12-4-2020 by icceivenin because: (no reason given)