It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: putnam6
www.researchgate.net...a reply to: ElectricUniverse
www.researchgate.net...
This guy makes a ton of sense , highly suggest at least opening your mind to his perspective
Perspectives on the Pandemic, Professor Knut Wittkowski, for twenty years head of The Rockefeller University's Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design, says that social distancing and lockdown is the absolutely worst way to deal with an airborne respiratory virus.
Further, he offers data to show that China and South Korea had already reached their peak number of cases when they instituted their containment measures. In other words, nature had already achieved, or nearly achieved, herd immunit
Grokking this basic premise isn’t like understanding string theory.
If you can’t even “see a good reason” for flattening the curve, then you probably don’t know what you’re talking about.
After this, Wittkowski goes on to say that there is no shortage of PPE equipment. His reasoning is that, somewhere in the world, there exists PPE equipment that is not currently being used, ergo any local “shortage” is just a misallocation.
This is true in the same way that a drought is just a misallocation of water that is currently in the ocean.
A factual search reveals they have not failed a fact check.
Overall, we rate the Bulwark Right-Center Biased based on story selection and political affiliation that moderately favors the right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. (D. Van Zandt 4/30/2019)
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
"Not that bad" doesn't mean nobody is dying. "Not that bad" means it is NOT the hellstorm Americans were fear mongered into surrendering their economy and their Constitution to fight. In my judgement, that's 100% accurate... millions were never going to die from this. It's absolutely an overblown bulwark that globalism needed as a last ditch effort to stem the tide against their global world order that the past decade or so had seen crumbling around the planet.
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
Fox News is a crap source
originally posted by: Zcustosmorum
Things to be aware of:
The death rate is only based on testing done, and seeing as testing is lagging behind, there's a good chance that a lot of people have already had the infection, therefore the death rate is probably lower.
Once more testing is done, a more accurate picture can be formed.
There are still risks however, a second wave can occur if quarantine measures are not adhered to
originally posted by: SeektoUnderstand
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
You’re not too bright, please research with an open mind and critical thinking. Then you will be enlightened......
p.s. Way more people have been infected (only tested are shown) meaning death rate is probably right around .02 ✌🏼
originally posted by: DoctorBluechip
a reply to: putnam6
Op , get stats on the hospitalisation rate . If half a million are confirmed us cases the hospitals will be reaching capacity ( with upto a third (160 000) in hospital or about to go in ) is that the case.
originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
The infection rate is higher than the tested rate. So the mortality rate means little.