It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: nerbot
a reply to: JoeGee
The dinosaurs farted a lot before they went too.
We brain fart instead now it's our turn.
Surviving (lol) a massive meteor strike would be more about feeding a face than building a massive machine.
No More Facebook Please. I hate swearing.
can we create massive machines capable of sucking those particles out of the air?
originally posted by: Gothmog
The damage done depends on a multitude of factors.
originally posted by: madmac5150
originally posted by: Gothmog
The damage done depends on a multitude of factors.
Exactly... a land impact would be much different, than an oceanic impact.
A polar impact could cause minimal damage... a temperate zone impact would be catastrophic.
People could be killed, out in the open... or killed at home, hiding from a virus.
No impact scenario, would be without societal damage... the panic caused by the media; well... we are seeing now, just how that works...
originally posted by: JoeGee
So the devastation a 1-mile wide meteor would cause is catastrophic. We're talking about leveling the earth for 1,000's of miles.
Those that don't die will be sent into an age of darkness and global cooling, which would bring about the end of civilization.
So what I'm asking, if we can create weather, can we create massive machines capable of sucking those particles out of the air? Obviously it would be a time consuming process if even fathomable, but is it achievable? I need to ask the great minds here at ATS, not sure I can get a worthy response from my Facebook friends.
originally posted by: nerbot
Nor do we.
We bounced on a moon and orbit this ball of dirt in expensive dustbins, robots do the rest.