Election Integraty Anyone --- All mail voting Now....

and open source code voting after the pandemic. Seems simple enough to me. But TPTB seem to want to keep it a profit center and hackable. So much for Democracy.

Is anyone concerned about how things will go this November?

nymag.com...

thehill.com...

www.theguardian.com...

prospect.org...

How important is the vote to you? How about how important is that your vote be counted accurately?

Only 60% of eligible voters participate in this democracy charade as it is.

a reply to: FyreByrd

Like I said in another thread a week or so ago, you're gonna need a gov app come November if you want to 'vote'.

Watch the MSM and democrats desperately avoid the need for VOTER ID during this next clown show.

Vote harvesting = all your votes are belong to us'.

a reply to: FyreByrd

So you are FOR voter fraud.

'Kay.

*shrugs*

Shiocked face.

I just voted in my state’s primary via early voting. City Hall was all set up, everything kept everyone more than six feet from each other. I was able to go do my vote early, and it was easy and quick. I filled out a paper ballot, put it in an envelope, and then put it in the box they told me to put it into. I just don’t see myself doing online voting. I don’t believe that would secure enough.

And Sublimecraft, why do you paint everyone with a broad brush? I’m a democrat, and I’m all for voter ID. I had no problem showing my driver’s license when I went to vote. Why put politics in this?

a reply to: FyreByrd

I hope the states decide for themselves and don't take their cues from the federal government like they have, so far, with regard to all things 'coronavirus.'

Might this be why no one seems to care:



by:

Paul Weyrich, "father" of the right-wing movement and co-founder of the Heritage Foundation, Moral Majority and various other groups tells his flock that he doesn't want people to vote.

Became state law here last year.
I'm going to miss going to my polling place, but not too much.

elections.hawaii.gov...

a reply to: FyreByrd



I Vote for Black Or White Pot Shards in All 50 States ! Cheaters Be Damned ! .............

a reply to: FyreByrd
Please change "Integraty" to "Integrity" in your title while you can. You have 2 hours from the start of the thread. Good luck!

a reply to: FyreByrd

Unless they force me away at gun point I will be voting in person.

a reply to: FyreByrd

and open source code voting after the pandemic. Seems simple enough to me. But TPTB seem to want to keep it a profit center and hackable. So much for Democracy.

I seem to have found your problem.

America is not a Democracy.

Get back to us when you have read up on what a Republic is.

originally posted by: IredBafi
Only 60% of eligible voters participate in this democracy charade as it is.

120million non voters is probably the biggest problem the usa has.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: FyreByrd

So you are FOR voter fraud.

'Kay.

*shrugs*

Shiocked face.

Please explain why mail-in voting will lead to more voter fraud than in-person voting.

As far as I know, there is no county in the US where you can get on the registrar's list of legal voters without having had to show some form of approved identification, somewhere along the line. If the registrar sends a ballot to me, they do so only because they know I am on the approved list. It seems to me that the only way there could be fraud is if someone steals my ballot out of the mailbox and mails it in fraudulently. How often does that happen?

I think every state already allows mail-in voting under some circumstances, like military personnel stationed overseas, or students attending college out of state, etc. Are all of those mail-in votes fraudulent? Why not?

Trump's objection to mail-in voting is not that there will be massive amounts of fraudulent voting. Quite the contrary; he is very open about the fact that he thinks there will be a lot more perfectly legal voters and they will all vote Democrat.

He's not concerned about stopping voter fraud, he's concerned about suppressing voters who probably won't vote for him.

a reply to: 1947boomer



" He's not concerned about stopping voter fraud, he's concerned about suppressing voters who probably won't vote for him. "


Can you Verify that Assumption ? .Ah , I Thought Not .............