It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
Im all for dumping China, I don't have a solution but cutting off ones nose despite their face isn't a solution either and no amount of pounding sand will change that reality.
originally posted by: Snarl
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
Im all for dumping China, I don't have a solution but cutting off ones nose despite their face isn't a solution either and no amount of pounding sand will change that reality.
Neither will the bleeding from your heart.
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Snarl
Im all for dumping China, I don't have a solution but cutting off ones nose despite their face isn't a solution either and no amount of pounding sand will change that reality.
Cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Your version is... disturbing, if I understand the English language correctly.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Snarl
Im all for dumping China, I don't have a solution but cutting off ones nose despite their face isn't a solution either and no amount of pounding sand will change that reality.
Cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Your version is... disturbing, if I understand the English language correctly.
Do you understand English?
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Snarl
Im all for dumping China, I don't have a solution but cutting off ones nose despite their face isn't a solution either and no amount of pounding sand will change that reality.
Cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Your version is... disturbing, if I understand the English language correctly.
Do you understand English?
All I'm saying is it would be great to dump China but doing it in a way that doesn't result in massive long term pollution problems.
It's mind bottling, isn't it? You know what they say, stupid is as stupid was. So frustrating when people misapropagate words.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Lumenari
Fair enough English is a very difficult language to understand even for English people,
Certain words have multiple meanings, that coupled with the context in which they're being used can also change the meaning.
But I digress any ideas on how to bring industry back in a way that would minimise the impact on air and water quality ?
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Ksihkehe
I find it difficult to have a simple conversation with people that attack at every opportunity while missing the point in spectacular fashion.
Is it really such a bad idea to find solutions to bring back industry but in a way that would minimise issues we know come with it ?
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Lumenari
I could be wrong but I was under the impression the U.S had some pretty serious environmental issues when they were leaders of industry after ww2 and that changed dramatically when China took over much of the production.
I guess i would like to see it done right and in a way that can be sustained long term, here in OZ we need to do the same, we used to make a lot of things and it was great quality, a return to made in OZ and made in America would be great to see.
I didn't find her comment to be malicious so I didn't see it as an attack. It was just funny to me that you asked her if she understood English after you made the mistake.