It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Nope That would be Alex Azar.
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Gothmog
Nope That would be Alex Azar.
just like all cabinet postions the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services Boss is President Trump. what kind of holy hell do you think would happen if the Secretary of Health and Human Services just went ahead and ordered the CDC to a lock down the country without first talking to President.
true as as in most of the normal everyday duties the secretary can set some polices, but declare a lock down on his own is not one of them.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: choomsuba
Martial law doesn’t exist because President Trump has not declared it yet, that’s it!
a reply to: Gothmog
Martial Law does not exist , period .
The military thinks it does....
www.militarytimes.com...
www.usconstitution.net...
And , a "lockdown" is not declaring martial law... Period.
Does US President Have Legal Authority to Quarantine States/Cities
originally posted by: choomsuba
Lol
As Commander in Chief of the military President Trump has the power to declare martial law with the full force of the military to back him up, civilian law is suspended at that time.
a reply to: Gothmog
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: choomsuba
Lol
As Commander in Chief of the military President Trump has the power to declare martial law with the full force of the military to back him up, civilian law is suspended at that time.
a reply to: Gothmog
I will end this here....
That power does not exist , and we are taking this slightly off-topic.
Folks really , really need to learn the subject.
There is a case when there would be a sort of martial law declared on a national / federal level
You said it in your post , but have it exactly backwards.
Done.
On to the next
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: choomsuba
Lol
As Commander in Chief of the military President Trump has the power to declare martial law with the full force of the military to back him up, civilian law is suspended at that time.
a reply to: Gothmog
I will end this here....
That power does not exist , and we are taking this slightly off-topic.
Folks really , really need to learn the subject.
There is a case when there would be a sort of martial law declared on a national / federal level
You said it in your post , but have it exactly backwards.
Done.
On to the next
The case where it would be Constitutionally warranted would be if the US were invaded by a foreign power.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: choomsuba
Lol
As Commander in Chief of the military President Trump has the power to declare martial law with the full force of the military to back him up, civilian law is suspended at that time.
a reply to: Gothmog
I will end this here....
That power does not exist , and we are taking this slightly off-topic.
Folks really , really need to learn the subject.
There is a case when there would be a sort of martial law declared on a national / federal level
You said it in your post , but have it exactly backwards.
Done.
On to the next
The case where it would be Constitutionally warranted would be if the US were invaded by a foreign power.
New Orleans, Louisiana in the War of 1812, Nauvoo, Illinois, during the Illinois Mormon War, Utah during the Utah War, Ex parte Milligan, The Great Chicago Fire, San Francisco earthquake of 1906, Colorado Coalfield War, West Virginia Coal Wars, The Territory of Hawaii, .
a bill passed in the United States Congress on September 29, 2006, and signed by President George W. Bush on October 17, 2006, becoming Public Law 109-364. In addition to allocating funding for the armed forces, it also gave the president the power to declare martial law and to take command of the National Guard units of each state without the consent of state governors.
`Sec. 333. Interference with State and Federal law `The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other :means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it-- `(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, :privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and :the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that :right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or `(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes :the course of justice under those laws. In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have :denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.'
originally posted by: carewemust
Under "Emergency powers" the president can lock-down the entire country, if he wants to. That's what Dr. Fauci was advocating last night.