It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
to me it's laughable how certain people always reach for a far fetched reason to find a conspiracy or cover up.
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
you do know what preprint means on a paper don't you? it means that it has not been peer reviewed or published in a scientific journal.
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
here i found this while trying to find a good link for your broken one.
While the two authors do not provide any evidence that the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) was created in the lab, they build their case based on assumptions. They begin by saying that bats carrying the novel coronavirus are originally found in Yunnan or Zhejiang province, which is more than 900 km from the seafood market at the centre of the investigation on the source. Hence, the chances of bats “flying to the market” are slim.
Opinion | A preprint provides ammunition to conspiracy theories about SARS-CoV-2 origin
now granted this is a Opinion piece. but The Hindu is rated high for factual reporting and their sources.
...
...
The bats carrying CoV ZC45 were originally found in Yunnan or Zhejiang province,
both of which were more than 900 kilometers away from the seafood market. Bats were
normally found to live in caves and trees. But the seafood market is in a densely-populated
district of Wuhan, a metropolitan of ~15 million people. The probability was very low for the
bats to fly to the market. According to municipal reports and the testimonies of 31 residents
and 28 visitors, the bat was never a food source in the city, and no bat was traded in the
market. There was possible natural recombination or intermediate host of the coronavirus,
yet little proof has been reported.
...
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
so i guess i'm one of those certain people that would take the word of a left leaning, opinion piece over a super market tabloid any day. plus, did you notice that your external source has the word preprint at the top.
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
also do you really believe that the WHO would back China in this so called BIO weapon escape/ or accident. to do that and if any evidence came out that it did cover it up their credibility would be shot completely. they don't have a high degree of that now.
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
I am no authority on this, but aren't there genetic markers when a virus is engineered? With this many people looking at it I would think someone would have noticed by now.
By Steven W. Mosher February 22, 2020 | 11:18am | Updated
...
Xi didn’t actually admit that the coronavirus now devastating large swaths of China had escaped from one of the country’s bioresearch labs. But the very next day, evidence emerged suggesting that this is exactly what happened, as the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology released a new directive titled: “Instructions on strengthening biosecurity management in microbiology labs that handle advanced viruses like the novel coronavirus.”
...