Why does Savage show such videos on his web site

I like listening to him on the radio. I can not take him seriously and half of the stuff. How can he show such demented BS on those video clips. i won't post the link, that sh..t is awful!

Does it make me hate those people more, no. Does it make question Savage's intentions yes. This is likely not a new thread so either send me to it or comment on it.

I just found the site and have no idea who or what the guy is about but i will say this, he is SHOWING the facts, not makeing an assesment based on his opinion.

His intentions are to spew hate against minorities, muslims, arabs, gays etc...

Here's a little excerpt from one of his shows:

mediamatters
The most -- I tell you right now -- the largest percentage of Americans would like to see a nuclear weapon dropped on a major Arab capital. They don't even care which one. They'd like an indiscriminate use of a nuclear weapon. They want this over with. One thing people cannot live with, which is an undefined, limitless conflict, which is what we have now. They can't take it. They want this war over with, and they want it ended like the war against Japan. They'd like Big Boy dropped on one of the little cities over there. They don't care where. They don't care any more. The American people have had it up to here with this garbage.

In fact, Christianity has been one of the great salvations on planet Earth. It's what's necessary in the Middle East. Others have written about it, I think these people need to be forcibly converted to Christianity but I'll get here a little later, I'll move up to that. It's the only thing that can probably turn them into human beings.

I'm going to give you one further example from my background as an anthropologist just so that you -- I'm trying to put context on this because you can go crazy if you don't have the context on this, because I'm going to lead up to something of what we must do to these primitives. Because these primitives can only be treated in one way, and I don't think smallpox and a blanket is good enough incidentally. Just before -- I'm going to give you a little precursor to where I'm going. Smallpox in a blanket, which the U.S. Army gave to the Cherokee Indians on their long march to the West, was nothing compared to what I'd like to see done to these people, just so you understand that I'm not going to be too intellectual about my analysis here in terms of what I would recommend, what Doc Savage recommends as an antidote to this kind of poison coming out of the Middle East from these non-humans.

He calls then non-humans even though he's advocating things worse than anyone in that area has ever done. Maybe one day he'll wake up and realize he is the evil one.

They are non humans. He's showing the vids so you can see the true evil of these worthless sub-humans.

And he advocates the things he says because these people do not deserve to live! Michael Savage is just telling it like it is.

Originally posted by HALLOWEEN78
They are non humans. He's showing the vids so you can see the true evil of these worthless sub-humans.

And he advocates the things he says because these people do not deserve to live! Michael Savage is just telling it like it is.

Yet we do this?
images.google.co.uk...:WWnPrqRzzt4J:free.freespeech.org/americanstateterrorism/palestine/plstngraphics/Helmi.jpg

Originally posted by HALLOWEEN78
They are non humans. He's showing the vids so you can see the true evil of these worthless sub-humans.

And he advocates the things he says because these people do not deserve to live! Michael Savage is just telling it like it is.

Does this comment qualify for what was pointed out here:
Dark Days. (The black band on ATS)

[edit on 17-3-2005 by AceOfBase]

I got warned for calling the terrorists sub humans! I wasn't talking about arab people. I was talking about the people who committed the beheadings.

And about the pic. That person is a victim of a war on terrorism! I feel sorry for every citizen injured or killed in the war. However, I highly doubt that the U.S. or Britan seeks out innocent civilians to toture and murder. I kinda doubt that the U.S. and Britan capture civilians and saw their heads off with dull knifes.

God help this and other nations if there is ever another world war. Just for your own etification, thousands of civilians were killed in WWII by the Germans, Brittish, and Americans. But it won the war. Now a few civilians have been injured and/or killed in the war on terrorism, and all of a sudden the U.S. and Britan are the bad guys!

The U.S. will not win a WWIII with people like that undermining their every move.

Originally posted by HALLOWEEN78
I got warned for calling the terrorists sub humans! I wasn't talking about arab people. I was talking about the people who committed the beheadings.

The text I quoted from Savage, in which he called Arabs non-humans, said Americans want to drop a nuke on a Arab capital, they don't even care which one.
He was not just referring just to terrorists but to any Arab country.

When you said Michael Savage is just telling it like it is, you made it sound like you were agreeing with what he said.

Ok. I disagree with Mr. Savage. Even though I agree with him on most things, not that. However, I wasn't talking about the arab people. Just the terrorists. I was unfairly warned, but whattaya gonna do?

Originally posted by HALLOWEEN78
Ok. I disagree with Mr. Savage. Even though I agree with him on most things, not that. However, I wasn't talking about the arab people. Just the terrorists. I was unfairly warned, but whattaya gonna do?

That was extremely unclear then. It reads as a blanket statement against Muslims.

I'm sorry for the miss understanding. I have repeatedly heard savage say that terrorists were sub humans. I didn't know that this pertained to all arabs. But I would like my points back if at all possible.

Nevermind. I'll just specify from now on.

Originally posted by HALLOWEEN78

And about the pic. That person is a victim of a war on terrorism! I feel sorry for every citizen injured or killed in the war. However, I highly doubt that the U.S. or Britan seeks out innocent civilians to toture and murder. I kinda doubt that the U.S. and Britan capture civilians and saw their heads off with dull knifes.

Actually this child was beaten by an isreali captain then dragged around, he is ten years old.

Originally posted by devilwasp

Actually this child was beaten by an isreali captain then dragged around, he is ten years old.

And that compares to a savage be-heading how?

Reagan:

It's not about what it makes you feel. We all know which way you part your hair. (Which should start about a quarter inch above your right ear.)

It is more about what makes the general population feel. You see, you are not the average Joe American. The average Joe typically stays toward the middle leaning a little either way. (Maybe a little more than that these days.) This type of propaganda, which is what he does, is designed specifically to get a response immediatley. He wants you to form an opinion before you can even think about any part of your humanity.

It is a tactic. It is not just "to show you the face of evil." After all, you can probably find more evil people than them. I digress. The simple fact is if you watch it and immediatley jump out of your chair and shout, "We gotta go cut their heads off and then #@$^% down their throats and !#%$ with a W$#%^ and a #$^%% and don't forget about the @#$% with a powerbomb. These people are $%#$% and we should turn their $#@%@$ into $#%# with $#@%@% and nothing but the most clear glass ever," then he has already won out over any type of logic and has probably sold a book.

But I love listening to Savage. This guy is at least honest enough to come right out and tell you what he thinks. And he is pretty open about his tactics. And I honestly believe that everything that comes out of his mouth is the honest truth in his own mind...not just pushing the agenda of the day.

Originally posted by HALLOWEEN78
And that compares to a savage be-heading how?

Beating a child is in the same league as be-hadeing in my book.....

Well, I very strongly disagree. Beating a child is a terrible thing to do. It still doesn't compare to someone getting their head slowly hacked off with a weapon that's just a little sharper than a butter knife.

Originally posted by HALLOWEEN78
Well, I very strongly disagree. Beating a child is a terrible thing to do. It still doesn't compare to someone getting their head slowly hacked off with a weapon that's just a little sharper than a butter knife.

How not?
This child if not saved would have died, how does bleeding to death sound?

As I have stated before. While beating a child is a very terrible thing to do or condone, somehow it isn't as bad as seeing an innocent fellow countryman slowly getting his head hacked off. I'm sorry but you're not going to change my mind. Plus, I think there are quite a few people who would agree with me on this.

[edit on 3/18/2005 by HALLOWEEN78]

[edit on 3/18/2005 by HALLOWEEN78]

Originally posted by HALLOWEEN78
As I have stated before. While beating a child is a very terrible thing to do or condone, somehow it isn't as bad as seeing an innocent fellow countryman slowly getting his head hacked off.

Its an incoent child, almost beaten to death.
If he had been would it change your mind?

I'm sorry but you're not going to change my mind. Plus, I think there are quite a few people who would agree with me on this.

Woudl agree killing the future is not as bad as killing another person?