It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DoctorBluechip
a reply to: M5xaz
We re quite used to used to seeing unjustified speculation and aware of alleged attempts to politicise the situation from various quarters.
This is not here to play those games.
This thread regards a specific and real situation constituting the existence of a serious biohazard proximal to bourton on the water , a known Chinese tourist destination during the timescale of point source of c19 circa 1st December 19 .
As such the information contained is primarily for the world health organisation researchers or anyone with a serious interest in identifying the definitive source of c19. That must take place in despite of any attempted blockages . Given these facts and others not presently open sourced there are several good justifiable reasons to investigate and rule out this (ex) biohazard as the potential source : that is why it is here.
originally posted by: DoctorBluechip
a reply to: M5xaz
No blame is assigned on a national basis ? Countries are working together through the who to defeat this problem.
It's commonly recognised as a serious and imminent threat and knowing the actual source might save the whole globe a lot of hassle.
Stop getting in the way of common sense.
Scientific studies , Caro, schultzer etc indicate research undertaken which justifies the evidence put here. Ncbi literature also available online comprise the best open sourced on topic facts in support of theory produced here. This is a serious op.
For other posters complaining of note form updates, a knowledge of the actual recipie for disaster is being demonstrated but without spelling it out just how too clearly. No one wants anything happening like this again .
originally posted by: Lazarus Short
What a grammatical mess that was - was it done for effect? Why not lay it out in normal language, like most posters here, without odd words and phrasing??
originally posted by: DoctorBluechip
a reply to: M5xaz
It was obvious on page 1 that you are heavily invested in
1. Blaming c19 on China.
And
2. Blaming c19 on china .
There is no blame to assign on a national basis and it's still looking like China is not the true source.
There is an expectation that similar biased attitudes and wild , desperate assertions like yours will sniffed for the suspect activities behind the attempted cover-up of this bourton biohazard incident .
Good luck with that.
On the other hand you could be looking for pre assurances on certain criteria .
1. This case involves 100 percent facts.
2. Investigating this case would be very simple and there's enough hard evidence for it to take only minutes to rule in or out re c19 true source for further investigation.
3. It would take few resources to look at given warrant from correct authorities, if they're taking a duly cautionary approach without mis or malfeasance . It shouldn't be automatically expected that the HPA or local authorities will necessarily respond correctly , or that there is not already local involvement of health and other agencies.
4. Ruling this bourton biohazard in or out may help save lives and mitigate potential disaster .
5. For clarity's sake in a two liner :
Theory :
I) the facts indicate that c19 may have been inadvertently but with questionable recklessness released from a vector animal being kept under conditions conducive to the culturing of multiple zoonotic pathogens after a long period -up to120 days.
II) with regard to part I above , the circumstantial evidence indicates there are strong correlation s between the presupposed source location and UK Chinese tourism including direct transmission links from source , high local morbidity rates during the period , and particularly the estimated start date of c19 infections.
Conclusion : this theory may be of value in determining reasons for WHO concern over transmission of c19 not linked with the Wuhan epicentre , indicating a remote source point.