It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: The GUT
You mean this sorta thing GUT?
Lots of companies make Cube shaped LE orbit satellites these days.
But hey maybe America and allies should feel threatened given the amount of collective money we spend on our military budgets?
How much is enough?
Chad Underwood broke 15 years of silence on the subject, describing the object he recorded over the Pacific Ocean as “not behaving within the normal laws of physics”.
He said: “It was going from like 50,000 feet to 100 feet in like seconds, which is not possible.”
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: schuyler
Nothing new…
The first CIA director, Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter, was on the UFO org NICAP's board of governors from about 1957 until 1962.
Now, this honcho is an adviser to TTSA. Same methodology just different times. Old habits die hard
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: schuyler
Anyway, I’m trying to understand him. He did equate UFO research with 911 and PH. That in itself is strange and needs explaining.
...Cause IF some otherworldly powers who can run rings around human technological abilities are roaring to go at us, then, we are in serious trouble...So he needs to fess up if he knows something we don’t know.
Or the equating 911 and PH with this is hyperbolic nonsense.
originally posted by: schuyler
a reply to: Willtell
After your post I went back to re-read Mellon's article in case I missed something of import. The vast majority of it is a re-hash of what we already know (though "we" are not his target audience.) It's only the last couple of paragraphs where he admonishes the government to "do something." I do not think he is telegraphing anything he knows is about to happen. He is just reminding is that we have experienced vast intelligence failures in the past and uses 9/11 and Pearl Harbor as obvious examples, taking those at face value and leaving aside the conspiracy elements for the moment.
If someone else had written this article I would probably suggest that he is missing the mark because he is assuming "we" are doing nothing. I do not think that is the case. Indeed, the evidence would suggest the amount of effort put into figuring out the issue is on the level of the Manhattan Project. It's very big, very intense, and very, very secret. It's also been poking out at the seams as the Nimitz Encounters and the Wilson Document show.
But Mellon is no dummy. He has been well-placed in the intelligence community in the past. He's politically connected from an iconic family and in a better position than most to feel the pulse of what is happening beneath the surface. In short, he's a guy I think we ought to pay attention to. We also know that there are various elements within the Pentagon that are resisting Disclosure. Some of it is, IMO, downright stupid, including those who believe this is all Demonic. But Mellon is, I think, trying to break the dam open and get beyond the factions and into common knowledge. This he is applying pressure from the outside trying to get some traction to open this thing up.
My guess, anyway.
originally posted by: celltypespecific
Well said...but the Wilson documents are garbage.
originally posted by: schuyler
originally posted by: celltypespecific
Well said...but the Wilson documents are garbage.
Ah, you're an expert, then! How elucidating. Thanks for the contribution!
Besides, the evidence would suggest these otherworldly powers are NOT roaring to go at us. Otherwise, they would have already.
originally posted by: 0zzymand0s
a reply to: Willtell
To what end? History tells us such recon efforts are usually preludes to attack.
originally posted by: 0zzymand0s
a reply to: Willtell
Why though? If you take the evidence outlined by Schuyler (above) at face value, there appears to be a coordinated recognizance of our arsenal over many decades -- including our strategic nuclear forces. They appear to be testing the limits of our radar, communications, c&c, and aircraft. If our abductees are right they have been studying our biology and psychology as well.
To what end? History tells us such recon efforts are usually preludes to attack.
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: schuyler
I agree with you. And I am a believer in the actuality that some UFOs are legit and unknown, and we have many new events indicating something is going on.
My take is that what does he expect them to do what they haven’t already done?
He warns about a 911 or Pearl Harbor.
That in itself is very strange. What is he saying--the aliens are going to go on the attack?
What does he base that on?
An X-files episode he saw...or some real evidence.
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: shawmanfromny
My guess is (obvious to me) that the government does in fact investigate these incidents. They just dont tell us they are concerned enough to investigate because they know their concerns would raise concerns in the public realm, thus striking fear and confusion amongst the population.
originally posted by: 1point92AU
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: shawmanfromny
My guess is (obvious to me) that the government does in fact investigate these incidents. They just dont tell us they are concerned enough to investigate because they know their concerns would raise concerns in the public realm, thus striking fear and confusion amongst the population.
I agree with most of what you say however regarding this...
Yet Commander Fravor specifically mentioned there was ZERO investigation regarding his encounter. The other pilot who actually recorded the video made the same statement.
The news of its existence marks one of the most significant disclosures about government research into flying objects — and the so-far-unproven possibility of extraterrestrial aircraft — since Project Blue Book, a lengthy Air Force study of thousands of UFOs that was shut down in 1969. Project Blue Book failed to find “any technological developments or principles beyond the range of present-day scientific knowledge,” and no evidence of any “extraterrestrial vehicles,” according to the Air Force, though a small portion of the events it studied remain unexplained.
The encounter Fravor described was analyzed by the recent Defense Department program, he said, but its most significant questions — the nature of the object and what it was doing — have also remained unanswered.