It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: idiotseverywhere
a reply to: schuyler
well, you were talking about what would be realistic per person per year, and I commented I cannot come close to 8 million, but our system currently has things like this happening to insane amounts of people, many even just born into these high wealth stages ruining their own chance at accommodating reasonable amounts of wealth instead of insane amounts. if the cap is a billion, there is sort of a mutual goal among people.
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: DBCowboy
All too much of this "redistribution" nonsense is sheer unadulterated jealousy. They don't have it, therefore, no one should.
It's their money, no one should have any say in how they spend it, or don't.
originally posted by: idiotseverywhere
a reply to: DJMSN
a healthy dose of logic and reason, but sometimes the world is just unpredictable.
the corona virus could become a super flu, and some dude could end up selling 8 billion cures for 600 trillion dollars.
the world could have a water shortage, and some single company could end up controlling all the drinkable water
there could be a power crisis, like Enron, etc etc etc.
originally posted by: idiotseverywhere
a reply to: DJMSN
a healthy dose of logic and reason, but sometimes the world is just unpredictable.
the corona virus could become a super flu, and some dude could end up selling 8 billion cures for 600 trillion dollars.
the world could have a water shortage, and some single company could end up controlling all the drinkable water
there could be a power crisis, like Enron, etc etc etc.
originally posted by: idiotseverywhere
a reply to: toolgal462
our insanely complicated laws aren't complicated enough, the economics sector completely clears all these laws and even drafts them, it's not writing on the wall. (the bankers and the rich know they can break the rules, because they wrote the rules, thus they are more like guidelines to the rich)
"I don't think that billionaires should exist," Sanders, a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate, told the New York Times in an interview. "This proposal does not eliminate billionaires, but it eliminates a lot of the wealth that billionaires have, and I think that's exactly what we should be doing."
originally posted by: idiotseverywhere
a reply to: toolgal462
I don't know, but it doesn't change the fact anyone that starts a successful monopoly is insanely rich before it's over even when it's inevitable it will be absorbed.