It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: BlueJacket
Pretty cool, but didnt Tesla and Reich both do this without nano proteins 100+ years ago?
Tesla's was highly inefficient for transmission over distance.
originally posted by: Klassified
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: BlueJacket
Pretty cool, but didnt Tesla and Reich both do this without nano proteins 100+ years ago?
Tesla's was highly inefficient for transmission over distance.
Yes it was, which is why he wanted a tower in each town. Given time, he might have perfected it for longer distances though.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: trollz
Where does the absorbed water go?
I suppose that there must be some limit to how much water is absorbed before the system does not produce current.
If the absorbed water can be expelled by some means without requiring energy added, that would be great, but I have a feeling that it will require energy to 'dry' the nanowire film out.
I keep thinking that you can't get something for nothing.
Researchers develop system to produce electricity out of thin air
originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: Klassified
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: BlueJacket
Pretty cool, but didnt Tesla and Reich both do this without nano proteins 100+ years ago?
Tesla's was highly inefficient for transmission over distance.
Yes it was, which is why he wanted a tower in each town. Given time, he might have perfected it for longer distances though.
People already don't want to live under high tension lines. I can't imagine how itchy everyone would be with a huge tower in their back yard blasting out voltage. Sheesh.
originally posted by: Klassified
Given time, he might have perfected it for longer distances though.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: EartOccupant
Either or, it's just not feasible.
originally posted by: EartOccupant
Tanguska might disagree.
originally posted by: Blue Shift
And insanely inefficient.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: butcherguy
Is it just turned into hydrogen and oxygen and passed into the atmosphere?
If so, they should capture the hydrogen and oxygen and burn it... yielding water which could be reabsorbed by the film again.If it does break down water into hydrogen and oxygen and yield energy in return.... this would be quite a breakthrough, as normally it requires energy to break the bond in the water molecules.
Doesn't anyone think this sounds too good to be true?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Blue Shift
And insanely inefficient.
Shhh! You'll upset the resident Teslaphiles.
I've never seen one that works. You know of any? This thing was fun to watch use up so much money, which any physicist would know can't work:
originally posted by: TEOTWAWKIAIFF
a reply to: Arbitrageur
You forgot “kinetic energy” (like the free energy gravity thingys).
That's not really a source. Heat differences are ultimately coming from solar or from radiation (Geothermal for example is possible because of the radiation source, without which our planet would be colder).
And heat differences (OTC, heat to electricity, etc).