Iowa Caucus results

a reply to: RalagaNarHallas

www.cnn.com... CNN saying mayor pete pretty much blew his wad(read money) on Iowa and the first four states

Whoopsie...

I went to military academy with Senator/Colonel Sullivan

a reply to: burdman30ott6

a reply to: RalagaNarHallas

More backroom election tampering by the DNC. Strip Bernie and Biden of votes and give them to Pete B. to keep him viable. They pulled this in 2008 when they shafted Hillary and in 2016 when they shafted Bernie. I guess the DNC's pledge to keep primaries honest was very short lived.

I hear that Iowa DNC has imploded again tonight. Totally seized up.

originally posted by: carewemust
I hear that Iowa DNC has imploded again tonight. Totally seized up.

Yep
Torn speech and all
Wait till the indictments show up

You mean they all ran to Iowa, put themselves back together in Des Moines and imploded again..lol

This has been so predictable, I can only hope the "godfather" Joe Biden lands himself the Dem ticket to debate Trump.

The way Pelosi acted should receive major blowback, she acted like a child.

originally posted by: carewemust
I hear that Iowa DNC has imploded again tonight. Totally seized up.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: carewemust
I hear that Iowa DNC has imploded again tonight. Totally seized up.

Yep
Torn speech and all
Wait till the indictments show up

The Iowa Democrat election committee was supposed to release results in increments, after the first 62%. Just like a real election night. Didn't happen because there's something fishy going on.

a reply to: fringeofthefringe
I'm not sure which one has the most short-circuited brain... Pelosi or Biden?

Nobody knows, it's a mystery.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: fringeofthefringe
I'm not sure which one has the most short-circuited brain... Pelosi or Biden?

What I'd like to know is this: I read somewhere that there was a low voter turnout for the Iowa caucuses. Does anybody have the figures for number of registered voters against how many actually voted? The reason I ask is because on Sunday, I predicted to a liberal friend of mine that they would see a low turnout. Because I think a lot of people are totally giving up on the Democrats.

a reply to: TrulyColorBlind
The Iowa Trump rally last month had 27% Democrats in attendance. The caucus turnout was probably at at least 27% below what's typical.

We're now up to 71% of polling places reporting...from the initial 62%. No change in the candidate's positions.

Source: www.nytimes.com...

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: RalagaNarHallas

Democratic results are not in yet because they need to see how many dead people need to vote first to win.

No. They'll just bus in the ripe harvest of Alzheimers patients. From all the Statin drugs they supplied.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
You up people's asses with a need to find out who they voted for is not transparency, it's totalitarian.

Said the closet communist who wants to keep it secret.

originally posted by: tanstaafl
Said the closet communist who wants to keep it secret.

Keeping your vote secret is not communist, it's the basis of a truly free democratic process where you cannot be pressured at the time of voting by those with differing views.

I'm hoping you continue to argue this point, it's funny to watch your personal animus drive you down the path of advocating restrictive and dictatorial behavior.

Even funnier that you didn't address this other 'closet communist':

There's transparency of government, which is good, and transparency of personal privacy, which is Orwellian. Considering the social attacks we've seen laid upon people who have supported, financially or just ideologically, certain candidates, I think open ballots would be an absolute disaster. Either you'd have people assaulted in the streets for their vote, or you'd have a situation very much like the "elections" in dictatorships where you vote for dear leader because, if you don't, you get a bullet.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
Keeping your vote secret is not communist, it's the basis of a truly free democratic process where you cannot be pressured at the time of voting by those with differing views.

Really? Got any proof of that?

Seriously, in this day and age, it should all be open and verifiable. I want to know who the commun[social][fasc]ists are in my community, so I can publicly shame them.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
Keeping your vote secret is not communist, it's the basis of a truly free democratic process where you cannot be pressured at the time of voting by those with differing views.

Really? Got any proof of that?

Seriously, in this day and age, it should all be open and verifiable. I want to know who the commun[social][fasc]ists are in my community, so I can publicly shame them.

That's why I like a secret vote, so someone can't attack me, punish me for my vote.

a reply to: tanstaafl

Your post is proof enough of that.

And you still didn't address the other 'communist'. Funny.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
That's why I like a secret vote, so someone can't attack me, punish me for my vote.

You have nothing to fear but fear itself.

Of course, there should be laws with harsh penalties for anyone in the Media or Politics who would seriously attack you, and especially try to 'punish' you for your vote, but seriously - if you can't defend your vote to verbal 'attackers', then so be it.