It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
#INCIDENT A man has been shot by armed officers in #Streatham. At this stage it is believed a number of people have been stabbed. The circumstances are being assessed; the incident has been declared as terrorist-related. Please follow @metpoliceuk for updates
www.telegraph.co.uk...
Gulled Bulhan, a 19-year-old student from Streatham, claimed to have witnessed the shooting on Streatham High Road in front of a Boots store.
He told PA Media news agency: “I was crossing the road when I saw a man with a machete and silver canisters on his chest being chased by what I assume was an undercover police officer – as they were in civilian clothing.
“The man was then shot. I think I heard three gunshots but I can’t quite remember. “After that I ran into the library to get to safety. From the library I saw a load of ambulances and armed police officers arrive on the scene.”
www.theguardian.com...
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Arnie123
And if the terrorist had 'firearms' there would no doubt be quite a few more casualties and probably fatalities.
This has nothing to do with your Second Amendment Rights....stop trying to make it so.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: UKTruth
More Police might be nice.
Or at least enough Police to do the fecking job at hand.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: UKTruth
Do you imagine we require less Police to do the job at hand?
We need the numbers to Police our cities in an appropriate manner.
That's just common sense.
You don't cut crimes by cutting police numbers.
Nice whataboutism, nothing of the sort happened, firearms saved the day, facts.
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Arnie123
And if the terrorist had 'firearms' there would no doubt be quite a few more casualties and probably fatalities.
This has nothing to do with your Second Amendment Rights....stop trying to make it so.
There is no other way of "putting" anything, a knife wielding terrorist hurt people and was gunned down, firearms saved the day, FACTS.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Arnie123
Was that not Police and other authorities?
How many people would have been injured or killed if the muppet had had a gun?
My bet is more than two, put it that way.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Arnie123
And if the terrorist had 'firearms' there would no doubt be quite a few more casualties and probably fatalities.
This has nothing to do with your Second Amendment Rights....stop trying to make it so.
Oh but it does indeed! How many stabbing victims would still be alive if they had that same right for self defense we have in the USA?
ALL OF THEM.
Within this, there were 76 homicides attributed to cutting or stabbing in New York — the exact same number as in London, according to data from Murdermap