They are coming for your guns, now more than ever. Is a catastrophic event imminent?

The goal to disarm the American people has been known by many for some time.

Now with many leaders on the Left publicly stating it, theres no doubt:

California Lt. Gov Gavin Newsome to NRA: “We ARE Coming for Your Guns”.

But why the sudden acceleration to confiscate firearms?

Is there a catastrophic event on the horizon?

In preparation of a complete collapse, Venezuela banned civilian ownership of firearms.

We're told that the economy is great!" But every administration tells us this regardless of whether or not its true.

Since the collapse of 2007-08, the market has been on a tear:


Intuitively, we know this cant go on forever. There HAS to be a "correction". What we dont know is exactly when its going to happen and how bad its going to be.

Are there any other indications that we're headed for a financial collapse?

Yes.

With an inverted yield curve, are we headed for a collapse?

According to this article, a yield curve inversion had preceded the past 11 recessions...

And recently, something significant happened which was conveniently drowned out by any number of other events:


Repo Market Chaos Signals Fed May Be Losing Control of Rates

“The Fed has lost control of funding,” said Mark Cabana, head of U.S. interest rates at Bank of America Corp.

“Secured funding markets are clearly not functioning well,” said Jon Hill, a rates strategist at BMO Capital Markets.

Monday’s jump in overnight repo rates, especially since it’s not happening at the end of a quarter, is “bordering on chaos,” he added.

And although, the Democrats are the ones who have traditionally usurped the Second Amendment, theyre not the only ones.

Florida’s GOP-Led Senate Passes Gun Control for Gun Show Sales.

The Senate President is Bill Galvano (R-Bradenton). On January 17, Breitbart News reported that Galvano received two donations from the Michael Bloomberg-funded Everytown for Gun Safety. One of the donations was in the amount of $200,000 and the other in the amount of $300.000.

In Texas, Republican House Speaker Bonnen killed constitutional carry.

Reports are coming in that Republicans are usurping the Second Amendment in multiple states.

Republicans from Lindsey Graham to Dan Crenshaw have been pushing Red Coat gun confiscations.

And we know that bumpstock Trump is no friend of the Second Amendment.

Report: Trump Ramps Up Enforcement of Federal Gun Laws for Second Straight Year.

So, we have to ask, we have to wonder, why the sudden push?

Is there a catastrophic event on the horizon?

You do remember what Iceland did...

Iceland Sentences 29th Banker To Prison, US Bankers Still Collecting Bonuses.

The Bump stock thing was a political decision.. If you think Trump is is anti 2d just wait until a democrat gets into office.. As far as the rest of your thread S&F for the possibilities...

a reply to: 727Sky

I would agree that most Dems are worse, but we're seeing a definitive change among Republicans who are supposed to be defenders of the 2A.

Lets be honest, the majority of our public "servants", fear an armed civilian population.

a reply to: gladtobehere

But why the sudden acceleration to confiscate firearms?

Maybe, just maybe U.S. Politicians have finally come to there senses after so many " mass shooting "

You can but hope.

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: gladtobehere

But why the sudden acceleration to confiscate firearms?

Maybe, just maybe U.S. Politicians have finally come to there senses after so many " mass shooting "

You can but hope.

So if it wasnt for the 2A, there wouldnt be any mass shootings? If there is a law against weapons, people wont do criminal stuff? Last i checked, killing someone was allready illegal, and people still do it!

So why wont you and other people who are against the 2nd Amendment, take a look at why people shoot each other in the first place? Could it be because of bullying/harrasment? Cause if it is, it might be a bad idea to tell somebody with a gun, that they have no sense, or in other words, that you think they are stupid and that its their fault that people who had enough of being bullied or are just crazy, kills people. Just saying...

If you dont want people with guns to shoot you, try being nice to them, it might work

a reply to: NoFearsEqualsFreeMan

So if it wasnt for the 2A, there wouldnt be any mass shootings?

Do you know the answer to that question ? Making it easy to obtain firearms certainly doesn't improve the situation. Does it?

So why wont you and other people who are against the 2nd Amendment, take a look at why people shoot each other in the first place?

Again, making it easy to obtain firearms doesn't help that situation either.

As the saying goes " The few have spoilt it for the many "

a reply to: alldaylong

Do you know the answer to that question ? Making it easy to obtain firearms certainly doesn't improve the situation. Does it?

Yes, mass shootings happens in countries where they arent allowed to have guns too. People killing people happens EVERYWHERE. Sad but true.

Again, making it easy to obtain firearms doesn't help that situation either.

As the saying goes " The few have spoilt it for the many "

You got a point here, but most killings happens with illegal weapons, and you didnt address my point, that maybe we should look at the cause of the mass killings, not the weapons they use, cause people use all kind of stuff to kill other people with, not just guns.

WHY do people kill each other like they do, in the first place? Why?

S & F for this thread.

I do believe that the anti 2nd amendment people probably have an agenda to disarm the people. I'm wondering if they are doing it because if they manage to get Trump out (which they wont) there will be massive protests and such for overturning an election in which the people have the constitutional right to vote who they want in office.

It's basically an attempted coup.....The people trying to do it are deathly afraid of those with guns. Mainly because they are likely going to be used against them.

a reply to: alldaylong

I see your point but I respectfully disagree.

Yes there are some politicians that are going anti 2nd because of mass shootings but it's likely some are taking this stance because of financial kickbacks. Bloomberg for instance handing out hundreds of thousands. I'm sure there are others on the democratic party who are having to choose between continued financial handouts and the peoples right to bear arms.....I highly doubt they are going to give up their cash cows

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: NoFearsEqualsFreeMan

So if it wasnt for the 2A, there wouldnt be any mass shootings?

Do you know the answer to that question ? Making it easy to obtain firearms certainly doesn't improve the situation. Does it?

So why wont you and other people who are against the 2nd Amendment, take a look at why people shoot each other in the first place?

Again, making it easy to obtain firearms doesn't help that situation either.

As the saying goes " The few have spoilt it for the many "

none of my weapons have killed anyone, and I haven't used any of them to kill anyone. I can walk a few steps and have one in my hand. How's that for easy. I think the point is, the person who is doing the killing might be the problem. Why does that person feel that taking other lives was the right direction to go. If we spend just a little time trying to answer that, we might find out why knife attacks happen in places where guns are banned. Killing is already illegal.

You can do more damage with a car, than a gun.

Not sure why there's a fight over it, aside from the fact that with a gun you can kill specific targets.

As far as destruction and end of life capability, a car at the right speed and right place can easily surpass most shootings.

Yet, car control is strictly enforced.
You must have a license.
You must have insurance.
You must obey rules.

Buuuuttttt...
You can EASILY drive without a license.
You can EASILY drive without insurance.
Nearly everyone breaks traffic rules.

Why would gun control be different?

If you need to fight tyranny, you can figure it out, when you get to the fight.
If you need to hunt, you only think a gun is necessary. Man hunted all game, long before guns, and we have much better sharp weapons technology now, bows, crossbows, etc...

I'm not pro gun action or pro gun inaction.

I'm pro, "Why the hell do we all argue about this every day?"

originally posted by: 727Sky
The Bump stock thing was a political decision.. If you think Trump is is anti 2d just wait until a democrat gets into office.. As far as the rest of your thread S&F for the possibilities...

“Take the guns first, worry about due process later.” - Donald Trump

If you still think Trump is pro 2A, there’s a bridge with your name on it somewhere. Just because Democrats are actively working to take people’s rights from them doesn’t mean republicans can’t, and aren’t, doing the same thing.

As far as the economic aspect of your OP, i have long thought that the stats are BS. Sure ths stock market is up, but 10percent or less invest.

I look at the food bank stats.....record levels of food parcels being handed out. A 23 percent increase.


www.trusselltrust.org...

The other is student loan defaults.....40 percent of 1.6 trillion in default within 10 years.


www.cnbc.com...

I like what you did here respectfully, but I believe the Republicans have been pretty good about backing the 2nd. What you have to see is the two party system is a balance. If one side wants something, they can usually come to a compromise, such as bump stocks. We all know the D’s didn’t only want bump stocks.
They are both listening to their base, which is a good thing. I think...

a reply to: gladtobehere

An inch here, an inch there and soon 'they'll' have a mile...

Unless we DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.

That's the real question here - what to DO about it.

So - research who to vote for and then get off your arse and get yourself, your family and your friends to vote. Do whatever it takes to make sure each and every person you know - VOTES.

From there? Well...I guess I'd be worried 'they'll' take my gun but I had a horrible boating accident last month.

You cant take something forcefully and expect the response to be peaceful

Nobody is thinking ahead...A.I Drones already have reactionary technology based on sound...directional fire-assistance that makes it impossible to hide where you are firing from.....just pulling the trigger once is a death sentence.

Guns are obsolete already.

Bullets powder primers et al all have shelf-lives.

Not many people know how to use urine to make their own gunpowder.....lol.

Guns are personal and no one wants to be in the wrong for the LAST TIME......get it....if more people kept their mouths shut less shootings would happen over personal disputes....thieves and robbers are always going to be there.

They want to take away your guns so you have no choices but accept their Rainbow colored world.

Guns mean someone has to STFU before they get capped....it means everyone needs to have their filters on....or it might cost them their life.....to be frank no one takes life seriously anymore it has been so cheapened that we may need a re-valuation generically speaking.

What better way to reset the value of a Human life than by allowing everyone to wear sidearms and carry whatever weapons they choose whenever they choose.

Why let someone else tell you your life is worthless so worthless that you should not even make attempts to protect preserve or extend it....why let someone tell you to just shart the bed and let your life be valued like crap.'

People have forgotten how to shut the puck up.....its really that simple...don't let your mouth write cheques your arse cant cash.

They aren't coming for your guns they are coming for your voice...you will wear a Rainbow on your forehead or you will be punished....you will forsake your own values and beliefs for those that can be campaigned and politicked until they are shoved down your defenseless throat....and your kids and grandkids can shut the puck up just like you can shut the puck up...remember a lot of gender diverse groups don't value children like you may or grandchildren....get it?.....you are being phased out....this cannot happen If you can defend your own belief systems children and paternal/maternal/familial futures with weapons more effective than sticks and stones.

a reply to: gladtobehere

From the L.E.O./Responders/military: So who will be ordered to get them? I know police, fire, military....that would NOT follow the orders....

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: gladtobehere

From the L.E.O./Responders/military: So who will be ordered to get them? I know police, fire, military....that would NOT follow the orders....

A.I will be ordered to get them....backed up of course by Human Enforcement...but once A.I is mainstream they will go in with zero negotiation intentions...think Robo-Cop....comply...now....or be remediated on the spot by A.I with zero conscience.

Here is a scenario....A.I rolls up to your home ...technology tells them you have guns....A.I tells you to surrender them ….once....you try to deny having them....A.I knows they are there and simply caps your hass on the spot then in come the supports who collect your guns.

If we don't know who is operating the A.I there are plenty of people who will gladly operate them from afar and from anonymity....just like the men with the guns when they used Firing Lines to execute people...some had real bullets and some did not and no one knew who had them and who did not....there are many ways around the human conscience.

Criminals breath air. If we ban breathing, we will stop all crime.