It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: khnum
a reply to: toysforadults
There is something really screwy about this one province admits 4000 infected yet a zero hedge article says the same place is setting up 100,000 beds in 112 centers there is only 92000 beds in my country Australia.
originally posted by: Bicent
Just found a so called recovered novel virus recovered patient.. I dunno what to make of it, but it’s all I can find. For those that might wanna check it out links below.
www.reddit.com... smf
originally posted by: TheAMEDDDoc
a reply to: Agit8dChop
This whole thing reminds me of all those dramatic movie or tv show scenes where they know it’s a huge problem, see a disaster approaching but don’t want to be that person who made the wrong decision and cost people money.
If those reports from the University in Hong Kong are correct, it’s already out and they’re in denial.
Wouldn’t high risk indicate the need for a health emergency to be declared?
originally posted by: khnum
a reply to: burdman30ott6
The other thing that gets me is this building a hospital charade surely the Red army is like mine and could set up self contained NBC tents as a makeshift hospital with filtered self-contained tents I think thats a pr exercise.
The progenitor virus itself was almost certainly one that circulates harmlessly in bats (as SARS does) but has an “intermediate reservoir” in one or more animals that come into contact with people, Andersen said. Presumably, that reservoir is one of the species of animals at the Wuhan market thought to be ground zero for the outbreak. The ancestor of 2019-nCoV existed in that species for some unknown time, never infecting people, until by chance a single virus acquired a mutation that made it capable of jumping into and infecting humans.
The genome sequences suggest that was a one-time-only jump. “The genomes [from the 24 samples] are very uniform,” Andersen said. “If there had been multiple introductions,” including from many different animals, “there would be more genomic diversity. This was a single introduction.”
That means that what’s sustaining the spread is human-to-human transmission (suggesting that closing Wuhan’s animal market is very much an after-the-horse-has-fled-the-barn reaction).
originally posted by: Charliebrowndog
a reply to: burdman30ott6
The WHO is on par with the UN just a garbage organization that needs a gigantic enema
originally posted by: khnum
All my countries doctors are getting masks but we're still flying them in I am getting biblically pissed of the fires now this.