It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: toolgal462
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: toolgal462
No, the defense is doing exactly right concerning Bolton. If they can prove the prosecution's case shows the exact opposite of what is being claimed (as they are doing very well), Bolton is irrelevant.
Bolton is a shiny coin tossed in the street to divert attention. Nothing more.
TheRedneck
I know that but the typical lefty wont care. Hell, even Romney is now changing his tune and would like to have Bolton testify.
More at: theconservativetreehouse.com...
The “House Bolton Maneuver” was a pre-planned operation to use a timed NSC ‘resistance’ leak to frame a new demand for testimony in the Senate. From the beginning the House intentionally constructed an impeachment process to avoid the judicial branch because the construction of the articles was dependent on an unconstitutional creation: impeachment by decree of the Speaker.
originally posted by: Scepticaldem
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: toolgal462
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: SonOfTheLawOfOne
Joe and Hunter Biden must be really stupid.
Is that even in question?
I knew they were greedy, but joining a company that is being investigated by governments for being so corrupt, is downright stupid.
Her timeline 100% puts to death the conspiracy theory argument they have been pushing.
Bet this isnt talked about once on NBC or CNN tonight. Will show them for what they really are!
Now Herschmann is asking who debunked the Bidens are corrupt theory.....?
Lolz🤪
originally posted by: Scepticaldem
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Scepticaldem
Kobe's death is keeping the MSM from making Trump's defense the #1 story tonight.
The muppet Bolton is #2 as far as I can tell
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: RalagaNarHallas
As far as I know, Bolton has yet to personally confirm what the NY Times reported. But...
More at: theconservativetreehouse.com...
The “House Bolton Maneuver” was a pre-planned operation to use a timed NSC ‘resistance’ leak to frame a new demand for testimony in the Senate. From the beginning the House intentionally constructed an impeachment process to avoid the judicial branch because the construction of the articles was dependent on an unconstitutional creation: impeachment by decree of the Speaker.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: toolgal462
I just found out recently (might have been a link in this thread) that the call transcript was moved to a classified server specifically over fears that Democrat operatives would hack in and change it.
originally posted by: toolgal462
I know that but the typical lefty wont care. Hell, even Romney is now changing his tune and would like to have Bolton testify.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: toolgal462
I just found out recently (might have been a link in this thread) that the call transcript was moved to a classified server specifically over fears that Democrat operatives would hack in and change it.
Not sure what you read, but that is BS. It was because of the ongoing leakage problem.
As to the OP question, the reason the Rs don't want witnesses is because many of them, possibly even Lyndsey himself, are implicated as well.
Seriously, do you really believe this corruption stops with the demwits?
Seriously, do you really believe this corruption stops with the demwits?
originally posted by: TheRedneck
"Seriously, do you really believe this corruption stops with the demwits?"
You've contributed in threads with me long enough that you should know better than that. Context, man, context.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
I have heard of Jay Sekulow for some time... never got to see him in action before. I have to say I am impressed. He is using facts and evidence from the prosecution to drive home the fact of how ridiculous it is that anyone would want to impeach a sitting President for a policy difference in an election year, and he's throwing around a lot of charisma doing it.
The others had great points, but some didn't exactly seem excited about them as they made them. I missed Dershowitz last night (WWE RAW, you know) so I am hoping to find him on YouTube this evening.
Tomorrow starts the Q&A session. It will be quite interesting to see what questions are being asked. I hope (haven't consulted the rules myself on this) that we also get to know which Senator asks what question. I do have my decision in a Senate race riding on this.
Then we'll find out about witnesses... probably Friday.
a reply to: tanstaafl
Seriously, do you really believe this corruption stops with the demwits?
You've contributed in threads with me long enough that you should know better than that. Context, man, context.
TheRedneck
The people can not be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. We have had 13. states independant 11. years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century and a half for each state. What country ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it's natural manure.