It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: spiritualarchitect
So now when pilots say they saw a flying "craft" no one wants to believe them. It's a wonder they can find their own plane on the flight deck.
Very disappointing.
originally posted by: celltypespecific
....you will learn more shortly...
Otherwise stop with the whole "disclosure is coming soon' thing please. Thanks.
originally posted by: Markword
originally posted by: spiritualarchitect
So now when pilots say they saw a flying "craft" no one wants to believe them. It's a wonder they can find their own plane on the flight deck.
Very disappointing.
It may be hard for you to accept, but the pilots are trained solely to identify known foreign aerial craft and rockets...fuel propulsion craft. Its a narrow, specialized focus, and a narrow specialized training. They have no training in identifying anomalous unknowns.
originally posted by: sean
Well it wasn't a balloon nor a bird. Now it's laser projections. Come on! Laser projection is at a infant state in development and very tiny results can be achieved on a table top in lab and under certain controlled conditions.
originally posted by: Markword
originally posted by: spiritualarchitect
So now when pilots say they saw a flying "craft" no one wants to believe them. It's a wonder they can find their own plane on the flight deck.
Very disappointing.
It may be hard for you to accept, but the pilots are trained solely to identify known foreign aerial craft and rockets...fuel propulsion craft. Its a narrow, specialized focus, and a narrow specialized training. They have no training in identifying anomalous unknowns.
.
originally posted by: 1point92AU
How interesting your statement is and yet we have "experts" who've never flown a single second inside the cockpit of a fighter jet able to readily offer a precise explanation for the very same "anomalous unknowns". You're statement literally debunks debunkers.
originally posted by: 1point92AU
...How interesting your statement is and yet we have "experts" who've never flown a single second inside the cockpit of a fighter jet able to readily offer a precise explanation for the very same "anomalous unknowns". You're statement literally debunks debunkers.
originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: 1point92AU
As posted earlier in the the thread. J.Allen Hynek discovered military pilots were actually the least reliable profession for their ability at recognising unknowns.
So can you explain what relevance flying an aircraft has with an ability to identify unknown phenomena?
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: 1point92AU
How interesting your statement is and yet we have "experts" who've never flown a single second inside the cockpit of a fighter jet able to readily offer a precise explanation for the very same "anomalous unknowns". You're statement literally debunks debunkers.
OK, two examples -- my investigation suggests these pilots misinterpreted space events -- a satellite reentry, and a satellite launch -- as non-human 'craft'. Where did I go wrong?
CONTEMPORARY PILOT MISPERCEPTIONS OF MISSILE/SPACE EVENTS
web.archive.org...://www.zipworld.com.au/~psmith/pilot-ufos.html