What if the Queen wanted Harry and Meghan to move

a reply to: BlueJacket

not so much the cloths more the earings and the broach the mind boggles

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

totally agree

There are RULES to being part of the Royal Family....it is a Career choice.

Queen Bee is not willing to let the Ginge hang himself for a Wife.....se will not allow him to throw his whole life away for his Wifes Fancy and Folly....the Money-Pit is bottomless as a Royal....so its clearly an attitude issue with the Wifey...she wants her Independence from the Royal Family meaning she wants to freely do things the RF would not be allowed to approve of although these are not "Bad things" only "improper" things......lol....maybe she just wants to be able to fart and burp in public without being heckled for life over it...she could be a Fart-Giggler who laughs every time someone makes wind....or maybe the both just want to LIVE AND BREATH FREELY EVERY DAY....and Canada is where they can do that.

This isn't another post but with a twist. These posts have been noted previously.

Harry is Charles' son. It's blatantly obvious.
Megan has caused a rift between Harry and his friends/family. It's obvious.

I'm always open to listening to a conspiracy, and maybe Harry does want to disconnect his family from a fairly messy family tree. I get that. but this whole "he isn't Charles' son" silliness has to stop.

originally posted by: MrConspiracy

...Harry is Charles' son. It's blatantly obvious.

...I'm always open to listening to a conspiracy, and maybe Harry does want to disconnect his family from a fairly messy family tree. I get that. but this whole "he isn't Charles' son" silliness has to stop.

I respectfully disagree.

The differences between Harry and William are clear;



...and the similarities between Harry and Hewitt are unmistakable and undeniable;



It's also no secret that Diana had an affair with James Hewitt, so there's certainly no conspiracy there.

You say that it's obvious that Harry is Charles' Son, I say it's obvious that he's James Hewitt Son.

(Don't get me started on Angela Merkel and Hitler, lol)

a reply to: MerkabaTribeEntity

Harry looks more like Charles than William does. Is William not Charles'?!

There is ginger in Diana's family. So what If Hewitt has red hair?

Diana confirmed the affair with James Hewitt starting in 1986. Harry was born two years prior.

Also - search pictures of harry and Prince Phillip. And stop the silliness.

I don't look very much like my brother. But we both has similarities of both parents. Comparing us would suggest... well, nothing.

Honestly..

As far as I'm aware, (living in England, working in retail where I meet a lot of people from all different backgrounds every day) no-one at all is the least bit interested in the story.

It's basically a media-induced piece of nothingness.

We really, really, really don't care where Harry and his wife lives. Or whether he and his brother get on. It's none of our business, we're not interested, it doesn't affect us one iota, we're much more interested in the life cycle of a Mauritian hermit crab , and where is the 100 days of the coldest winter on record they keep promising us?!!!!

a reply to: MrConspiracy

Harry looks more like Charles than William does.

I beg to differ look at this pic!!!!!!



William looks exactly like Charles. And Harry looks like Hewitt.
I'm not talking about hair color, I'm talking about face shape, nose shape, smile, eyes.

originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: MrConspiracy

Harry looks more like Charles than William does.

I beg to differ look at this pic!!!!!!

William looks exactly like Charles. And Harry looks like Hewitt.
I'm not talking about hair color, I'm talking about face shape, nose shape, smile, eyes.

[pic]

I cant post the pic or a link at the moment/on this pc for some reason but google harry charle's look alike. It's all there.

Harry looks exactly like James Hewitt. You can’t deny the similarity.
If I didn’t know who any of these characters were and you asked me who the father was, I wouldn’t say Charles.
People can deny it all they want. It doesn’t change anything.

originally posted by: rhynouk
Harry looks exactly like James Hewitt. You can’t deny the similarity.
If I didn’t know who any of these characters were and you asked me who the father was, I wouldn’t say Charles.
People can deny it all they want. It doesn’t change anything.

The nose knows! Seriously Harry has Hewitts nose, and William has Charles's nose.

a reply to: MerkabaTribeEntity

Have you not noticed that William's hair also has a titian colour to it? Diana's family are gingers...look at her brother...

Rainbows
Jane

They are brothers, the Ginge gene pops in and out within the Royal bloodline....and the Royal Ginge looks like other Ginges from different primary branches of that Family line.

Both Brothers CLEARLY carry significant traits from the real Royal Bloodline...and its not the Queens Bloodline.

originally posted by: rhynouk
Harry looks exactly like James Hewitt. You can’t deny the similarity.
If I didn’t know who any of these characters were and you asked me who the father was, I wouldn’t say Charles.
People can deny it all they want. It doesn’t change anything.

It's not a matter of denying it. It's a matter of understanding Diana didn't meet Hewitt until Harry was a toddler. How are these facts so difficult for people to understand.

a reply to: JAGStorm


I never looked like my mother .......I do now.

My children at various stages in their lives looks changed between looking like

me and looking like their father. Looks are not static. I don't know how to link

pictures but since William has lost his hair compare him with his youngest uncle

Edward. They could be brothers!! and neither of them like Charles.

How's that for genetics?

a reply to: MrConspiracy

It's not a matter of denying it. It's a matter of understanding Diana didn't meet Hewitt until Harry was a toddler.

How do you know? Do you know how easy it is to change the official "story" of how/when they met?
The only two people that know are them, and the only other proof is DNA.

originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: MrConspiracy

It's not a matter of denying it. It's a matter of understanding Diana didn't meet Hewitt until Harry was a toddler.

How do you know? Do you know how easy it is to change the official "story" of how/when they met?
The only two people that know are them, and the only other proof is DNA.

Madness. You're too far down the rabbit hole. I get that.

originally posted by: JAGStorm

How do you know? Do you know how easy it is to change the official "story" of how/when they met?
The only two people that know are them, and the only other proof is DNA.

Charles was the attentive husband till his spare was born?

Do you honestly believe that a DNA test has not been done?

If a DNA came up that the spare (Harry) was not Charles's he

would have had an easier time getting rid of Diana and Harry

would have had to go with Diana, due to not being Charles's

bloodline..........


The 'Royals' wouldn't keep 'a cuckoo in the nest!!

I think the whole situation is manufactured to get people distracted from the Prince Andrew Duke of York and that he partied with that Epstein Sex trafficker/ pedifiler. The FBI wanted to question him. It's all super disgusting and embarrassing to the royals.

I think that Harry orchestrated his own escape if you will. He did not get married to somebody from English aristocracy because then he would have been tied to England. By marrying a foreigner, it gave him the justification to leave. He could not have done it with anybody else.