Megxit: A Welcome Distraction for the Queen?

While most who care to comment on the newest kerfuffle to hit the English royals are in sympathy with the Queen, I believe that Harry and Meghan's abrupt retreat is fully to her benefit. After all, any distraction from her two sons' proclivities to associate with pedophiles is a good thing, right? And what could be more perfect than one which pulls on the heartstrings of the public, elicits sentiments such as "how could they disrespect their grandmother like that," and the admiration of the public for her graceful handling of the affair?
What better way to legitimize the crown than have everyone out there defending its right and duty to exist, and furthermore to barr any members from leaving?

Makes one wonder if the Queen was taken off guard as she claims.

In case anyone hasn't heard of the true royal scandal, here are a few sources to start with:
Prince Charles
www.theguardian.com...
www.dailymail.co.uk...

Prince Andrew:


Just a fun conspiracy to throw out there (that the royal family manufactured this red herring to take the public's mind off the true scandal). I'm looking forward to hearing your thoughts!

To me it seems a bit odd that this story comes out now. I think for sure something is going on but I don't necessarily think this was a distraction.

My guess is Harry is trying to distance himself from the family because of the madness they are involved in. When there is this much smoke there is fire somewhere. I think Andrew and Charles were/are up to some bad things.

I think much of the rumors we hear are true is well know by the royals but exposing it risks losing everything. I think maybe Harry is just at his breaking point and needs to remove himself from the situation. I also think it doesn't help him by having a Yank by his side either.

originally posted by: Charliebrowndog


My guess is Harry is trying to distance himself from the family because of the madness they are involved in. When there is this much smoke there is fire somewhere. I think Andrew and Charles were/are up to some bad things.

Interesting theory, and entirely plausible.
What is fascinating to me is that I read something to the same effect in the Daily Mail comment section, and that the vast majority of readers agreed (by upvoting). I think the idea of world politicians and royals engaged in reprehensible, illicit activities is departing the conspiracy realm and hitting mainstream.
Crazy times!
Thanks for reading/commenting!

a reply to: zosimov

My thought was their leaving was because of the pedo scandal. That they wanted to get as far away as they could from that nonsense.

a reply to: zosimov

I hear they're going to adopt Greta Thunberg, fly to their new home in LA and tell people in Mississippi they shouldn't run the AC below 76* while forcing them to eat their government mandated vegan artisanal tofu meat substitute.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

In that case, they deserve every bit of censure they get.

a reply to: grey580

It makes a lot of sense, and who could blame them?

I don't know exactly why I got the idea that the Queen herself might be involved. I can just hear the church lady (from SNL) in my head, though, saying "Now isn't that convieeeenient."

a reply to: zosimov

After all, any distraction from her two sons' proclivities to associate with pedophiles is a good thing

That's akin to saying Trumps impeachment is a distraction from his association with Epstein.

a reply to: alldaylong

Could be, but it's not at all what I wrote in the OP. Any comment on the topic?

Or is it just another red herring?

a reply to: zosimov

People can read anything into any situation.

Like you have, like i have.

Big Ears AKA Harrys dad lol Was best friends with the biggest child rapist in British history. Sir Jimmy Savile and now andy pandy and Epstein. Its a family thing they are all dodgy twats. Harry is not one of them really, so I think its best that he can get out before the whole thing gets exposed. As some one said it takes the heat off Andrew,so who knows the real reason for why he is going.

Something I found interesting about that second article (Daily Mail) I posted. It said that Savile introduced pedophile bishop Peter Ball into the royal circles (it was unsubstantiated, but interesting.)

He was propelled into the royal circle by two people, I understand. One was prebendary Willie Booth, a former chaplain at Westminster School, who’d taken over from Caesar. The other was Jimmy Savile.

www.dailymail.co.uk...

Meghan has been hounded by the press since the day she appeared. I don't think they've had a good word to say about her and all the constant comparing to Kate must be very wearing as well as possibly creating a rift between Harry and William. I believe, considering what happened to his mother, Harry wants his wife out of the headlights of the British Tabloids as difficult as that may be, he's putting his new family first, as he should

a reply to: PhyllidaDavenport

Very sensible, plausible reason behind the latest drama. I guess I'm just waiting for the scrutiny to return to the more questionable members of the family.

originally posted by: zosimov
Something I found interesting about that second article (Daily Mail) I posted. It said that Savile introduced pedophile bishop Peter Ball into the royal circles (it was unsubstantiated, but interesting.)

Just watched the final part of a documentry on BBC 2 on Peter Ball and how he

had been shielded by Charles, the archbishop's of Canterbury and Westminster

people from the house of Lords, and high ranking police officers.


I was appalled and the only conclusion I could come to was to defend it they

were ALL at it somewhere along the line ....... if not still at it. I am still

feeling sick as I type this.

a reply to: PhyllidaDavenport

Yeah, this is a pretty interesting article.

Here Are 20 Headlines Comparing Meghan Markle To Kate Middleton That May Show Why She And Prince Harry Are Cutting Off Royal Reporters

I've also seen a lot of suggestions that there's a lot of racism in Britain against her, but I haven't read enough about it to get details.

That said, I personally think it's a combination of the article above and with the fact that royal life has such strict protocols and rituals that it's hard for her to be...free, and she just wants to live the semblance of a normal, married life away from all of the ritual and BS of being married to royalty.

It could be because what is mentioned in the OP, and since this is, in fact, post in the general conspiracy forum, it's plausible.

But seeing some of the interviews with her it seems the royal tradition, ritual, attention, and press is something that really affects her negatively.

originally posted by Liquesence:
Meghan has been hounded by the press since the day she appeared. I don't think they've had a good word to say about her and all the constant comparing to Kate must be very wearing as well as possibly creating a rift between Harry and William. I believe, considering what happened to his mother, Harry wants his wife out of the headlights of the British Tabloids as difficult as that may be, he's putting his new family first, as he should

On the 10 o'clock news the Daily Mail has just laid out its defense in the case Megan

is bringing against them, and the basis is that it was already out there as she had

had her 'friends' leak the information to the American media of which he was

waving copies around.

Looks like she's picky about which media she wants exploiting her!!

a reply to: Liquesence

It's true that there have been rumors of discord between the brothers for some time now, and as a reader of the DM (it's for the comments, I swear! ) I've seen lots of bad press aimed at Meghan. So what you two are positing does make a lot of sense. Though I can't see marrying royalty if one were aiming for a normal life, I know that my perspective is very limited.

I still have to wonder if the Queen could have had her hand in it, and whether the above circumstances were seen as a way out through which everyone could benefit.

originally posted by: Liquesence


That said, I personally think it's a combination of the article above and with the fact that royal life has such strict protocols and rituals that it's hard for her to be...free, and she just wants to live the semblance of a normal, married life away from all of the ritual and BS of being married to royalty.

She chose to marry him.......no one held a gun to her head.

Whats normal about living in a £10 million mansion free? how many 'normal' people do

that? and have seven week X'mas vacations. She likes all the bells and whistles and

being the centre of attraction, after all she's an actress dont you know?

But seeing some of the interviews with her it seems the royal tradition, ritual, attention, and press is something that really affects her negatively.

If you believe that^^^^^you'll believe anything!

a reply to: zosimov

So what you two are positing does make a lot of sense. Though I can't see marrying royalty if one were aiming for a normal life, I know that my perspective is very limited.

I would hope one marries for love, whether prince or a pauper, and not for convenience, which I have no doubt some do.

I still have to wonder if the Queen could have had her hand in it, and whether the above circumstances were seen as a way out through which everyone could benefit.

It's quite possible.Interesting theory, and I really have no idea.