It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: pexx421
a reply to: carewemust
Bernie never promised anything free. He promised a return for our taxes. Which we don’t get right now.
originally posted by: proximo
a reply to: Waterglass
This thing about Bernie not being sleazy, are people not paying attention?
This is a guy who has 3 houses drives around a sports car and talks about how the rich is evil - yet appears to love material possessions.
Someone tell me how that is not sleazy?
He is also a guy that is promoting paying for all college, medical care, massive environmental spending and yet has to know none of that can actually be paid for. I know a ton of his followers are ignorant - but as a guy in the senate for many years he cannot be and has to know his proposals cannot be paid for.
Either he is making promises that if he actually tries to keep will annihilate the economy and he is fine with thousands and thousands dying from the depression they bring on - or he is fine about lying to the public to get elected. Either way makes him very sleazy in my book.
originally posted by: jjkenobi
originally posted by: pexx421
a reply to: carewemust
Bernie never promised anything free. He promised a return for our taxes. Which we don’t get right now.
Really? You don't have roads? highways? Police & fire? Schools? A military? Food Stamps/Welfare?
If what you're getting at is the govt wastes money then hell yeah we're on the same page. But putting them in charge of MORE is the absolute opposite direction of fixing this.
originally posted by: Breakthestreak
a reply to: pexx421
Sanders doesn’t stand a chance against President Trump in an election
You know that to be true
He will never be President
and
Would I like (Sanders) to be president? Yes. Do I think he’s electable? I don’t know,” Organschi mused. “That’s what I’m afraid of.”
but the question is even if the DNC will allow him to unseat biden as the chosen one this cycle like he was tossed under the bus for Hillary last time
But amid the campaign rally loyalists festooned with “Bernie” stickers and “Bernie Beats Trump” pins are some who say they’re comfortable voting for Sanders in the upcoming primaries, but question whether he has what it takes to go all the way in the general election. “That’s really the question, isn’t it?” said Shawnda Lapointe of Sanford, Maine, adding, “He has my vote in the ideal world.”
so then there is this as well plus obama's warning to dems to not go too far left which would seem to be aimed at a sanders and warren
Former President Barack Obama’s top lieutenants are eager to poke every conceivable hole in Bernie Sanders’ resurgent bid for the Democratic nomination. But ask about a coordinated effort to stop his ascending campaign and you’ll get crickets. Less than a month before voting begins, Obama has declined to offer a preferred pick to take on President Trump in 2020, only occasionally waxing philosophical about the perils of moving too far left and reminding voters to be “rooted in reality” when exploring nominee options. But as Sanders gained new flashes of traction in recent weeks, the former president’s lack of official guidance to halt his momentum, and the scattering of his inner circle to rival campaigns, have hampered any meaningful NeverBernie movement.
trump would enjoy debating Bernie on stage so id see it if he gets nomination as a ballance between people worried about his policies and those worried about trump et all
I would say Bernie Sanders can’t beat President Trump in 2020. But seeing as how Trump has already proved anything is possible in politics, let’s just say it’s very unlikely. Others disagree. Vox’s Matt Yglesias argued on Wednesday that Sanders can unify the Democratic Party and beat Trump. It's a debate worthy of consideration. Were Elizabeth Warren's progressive supporters to unify behind Sanders, he would be the easy front-runner for the Democratic mantle. But let’s imagine we’re now in the summer and Sanders has just secured the delegates he needs for the nomination. Suddenly, the campaign objective shifts from appealing to the very small number of Democratic loyalists who vote in primaries to securing independents and disaffected Republicans. First issue: How does Sanders sell his plans to increase spending by tens of trillions of dollars a year? Sanders says he'll just get the rich to pay more. But that claim belies the fact that America's income tax system is already one of the most progressive. And Sanders necessarily assumes that the rich will keep working and managing their affairs in the same way even if they face newly punitive tax rates on their incomes and estates. In the end, math means Sanders will either have to abandon the majority of his spending commitments or raise taxes sharply on the middle class. Thus follow the obvious Trump campaign ads framing Sanders as the Titanic of fiscal credibility.
from last December but an interesting read on incumbent trumps advantages
USA TODAY Poll: Impeached or not, Trump leads his Democratic rivals for another term
but they also say president trump is on track to win re election against any of them least per the bookies
Former vice president Joe Biden has 9-4 odds to win the Democratic nomination Sen. Bernie Sanders, D-Vt., has 9-4 odds to win the Democratic nomination Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., has 5-1 odds to win the Democratic nomination Former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg has 7-1 odds to win the Democratic nomination South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg has 9-1 odds to win the Democratic nomination
originally posted by: pexx421
Middle class is having the ability to own a home or 3, and cars too. Middle class starts around 150k a year.
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: pexx421
You're aware you were making false claims? That's rather more being a dick than calling out such false claims, don't you think? It doesn't even make sense as a general statement. Cost of living is only that high in a few states.
To answer your question, I don't make up my own definitions of words or phrases. If everyone gets their own definition, how the # would you have a meaningful conversation about anything? According to CNBC, over 50% of Americans are middle class. 70% of the country is not "working poor." You were wrong. I'll accept your apology.
ETA: Here's what middle class households earn by state. You'll note most of them start in the 40s and 50s, some even in the 30s. They range up into figures like you were talking about, but the higher you go the fewer people are in that income bracket. Most middle class clearly earn much less than what you were saying. The common definition by economists appears to be households that earn between 2/3rds and twice the median income in that state. And again, the higher you go, the fewer people are at that income level, so most are going to be on the lower end, closer to 2/3rds, than there will be closer to twice the median income.
originally posted by: pexx421
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: pexx421
You're aware you were making false claims? That's rather more being a dick than calling out such false claims, don't you think? It doesn't even make sense as a general statement. Cost of living is only that high in a few states.
To answer your question, I don't make up my own definitions of words or phrases. If everyone gets their own definition, how the # would you have a meaningful conversation about anything? According to CNBC, over 50% of Americans are middle class. 70% of the country is not "working poor." You were wrong. I'll accept your apology.
ETA: Here's what middle class households earn by state. You'll note most of them start in the 40s and 50s, some even in the 30s. They range up into figures like you were talking about, but the higher you go the fewer people are in that income bracket. Most middle class clearly earn much less than what you were saying. The common definition by economists appears to be households that earn between 2/3rds and twice the median income in that state. And again, the higher you go, the fewer people are at that income level, so most are going to be on the lower end, closer to 2/3rds, than there will be closer to twice the median income.
No critical thinking at all, eh? 60% of Americans can’t come up with $490 in an emergency, and you think the top 10% of those are middle class? You think that people making 2/3 the median income are middle class? Wow. New Orleans folk will be surprised, that’s $15k a year for them. And 19k for the national average. So, apparently you think people making $10 an hour are middle class. And $7 an hour in New Orleans. Oh, sorry you said by state. That’s $8 an hour for Louisiana. That’s not working poor to you? Then we have vastly different definitions of poor.
originally posted by: pexx421
So, just to clarify. MSNBC (and you, apparently) think that people making between $8 and $20 an hour in Louisiana (and $10-$25 nationally) are middle class. Hm. Guess that makes me the wealthy elite. No wonder you’re all so scared of Bernie when he talks about the rich. Y’all must think he means everyone making over $30 an hour. Hm.