VOTE FRAUD AND THE BANKRUPTCY OF THE UNITED STATES

In recent months, I have posted a series of article on the deplorable and quite frankly hopeless financial situation the government of the United States is presently in due to reckless and outright irresponsible fiscal policy.

In summary, the combined state and federal debt of the United States now stands at $14 trillion. The United States, the world's largest creditor nation when Ronald Reagan took office, is now the world's largest debtor nation. The federal debt has doubled in the last 8 years, during what is reported to the American people as being a record setting economic boom. During this same supposed economic boom, the federal government looted your social security trust fund for another 3/4 of a trillion dollars to balance the books.

A serious doubt exists as to whether this huge debt and its crushing interest payments ($60,000 per taxpayer since 1960) are really the responsability of the taxpayers. Considering that the law under which this debt was incurred was voted into law before most of us were born, it's clear that the taxpayers have never really had a choice in the matter. Certainly the young people of today, not yet old enough to vote, have had no choice regarding the continuing payment of interest charges for a debt not of their making. To hand such a huge debt to our children and order them to pay it is indentured servitude at best, outright slavery at worst. No valid argument exists as to why children not yet old enough to vote are obliged to pay the debts of reckless government officials who held office before these children were born. The government decides that children shall be slaves to the debt, so slaves they shall be (until some courageous parents decide to put a stop to it).

Virtually every argument coming from those who would convince us to go on parting with our hard-earned money to pay this massive and impossible debt amounts to a claim that we always have the choice to vote for politicians who will somehow change things, and that the election of a particular candidate amounts to approval of his or her policies. Put simply, the fact that the public voted for Bill Clinton amounts to permission by the public for him to run the federal government deeper into debt and loot our retirement money, or so goes the theory.


Rest of the article:

www.whatreallyhappened.com...

It was once argued before the connecticut suprem court (I think) that the U.S Constitution legally does not apply to generations born 20 years after it was written. That it would not hold up as a 'contract ad infinum' legally.

Jeez... does this mean that we could all really truly be free????

The Constitution is Freedom.

It is the law of the land so long as the US Government exists...and follows it.

There is no "Does not apply".

Well, I see my old friend Free Mason is back. Greetings.

Where have you been, on an extended vacation? On a secret mission?

As the constitution is not a contract against the people but the foundation of the nation, in accordance to the Laws of Nations, and gives the ability for your nation to interact with the rest of the world's nations, why would one assume it would expire twenty years after being submitted to the international community?

If a nation's populace were to decide not to pay its national debt, how could that nation be trusted to interact with the rest of the world's nations?

Merely questions raised, not an invitation to argue. Enquiring minds, you understand.