It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: vonclod
Without the bulk of the wreckage being located, they will never be able to prove much, one way or another..
originally posted by: RIPMH370
originally posted by: vonclod
Without the bulk of the wreckage being located, they will never be able to prove much, one way or another..
MH370'S final location is not that hard to find- pinpointed by two hydrophone arrays in 2014
ATSB conducted their seabed search 460nm further north
originally posted by: Sillyolme
If you were suicidal would you take a few hundred innocent people with you?
Come on. That should not even be on the table.
Who thinks these things up?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: ignorant_ape
For a crazy anti social maybe for the average suicide they want private and they do not wish to do harm to others in the process.
Sick people maybe.
Do you think this pilot killed himself and took the plane, the passengers and all the crew with him?
That is not suicide that would be kamikaze.
Do you think this pilot killed himself and took the plane, the passengers and all the crew with him?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
If you were suicidal would you take a few hundred innocent people with you?
Come on. That should not even be on the table.
Who thinks these things up?
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
originally posted by: RIPMH370
originally posted by: vonclod
Without the bulk of the wreckage being located, they will never be able to prove much, one way or another..
MH370'S final location is not that hard to find- pinpointed by two hydrophone arrays in 2014
ATSB conducted their seabed search 460nm further north
What is the source of this data (in the picture)???
I've never seen this before.
ETA - And I've certainly never read anything about contrail sightings by WX satellites in any investigative reports I've seen. This would be some particularly telling evidence, especially in that area because that is not a great circle route anyone would take (for any reason). So any type of a contrail in that area would certainly be notable and extremely out of the ordinary. If true, I'd like to understand why this data was discounted.
ETA2 - After some brief research, I'm going to have to raise the BS flag on your graphic. For one thing, it depicts the search area as far smaller than it really was. And secondly, the graphic seems to suggest the search area was well north of St. Paul Island (le Amsterdam), when in fact the 2014 Ocean Shield search was directly east and south east of St. Paul island. (See graphic below)
Searches through July 2015