a reply to:
vonclod
"One person on the council, deputy mayor Jo McNally, said they knew of several property owners pumping water from the ground to sell commercially
elsewhere, but there was little they could do. “This is happening all over the region and here we are singling out one landowner,” she said."
Source:
qz.com...
"Despite complaints by neighboring property owners, the council approved it—even as it prepared to implement extreme water rations in the area."
Source:
qz.com...
In these cases, the laws are faulty, because no laws are broken by these corporations, which are *NOT* all owned by Chinese business-people. All
landowners are equally immoral, but only "Chinese" is singled out to appear on Headlines.
Australian lawmakers are the ones who approved the action, yet 1 Chinese company (out of many nations) is being made to look like the main culprit.
The solution is not to petition every landowner to put common good on top of profits, but for Aussie voters to pressure their lawmakers to ban the
practice.
However, the headlines are mis-directing attention away from the fix.
In US, the news media is either forbidden or discouraged to disclose the race of a suspect or convicted criminal, especially for blacks, for fear of
accusations of racial profiling.
In Europe, Middle Eastern suspects and/or criminals are likewise being hidden in order to cool racial tensions.
On the contrary, in Internationally news, Chinese (and Russian)-owned corporations are singled out for Headline attention for any possible, (sometimes
unproven) moral impropriety, even if no law is broken, and that similar corporations owned by other nationalities are engaged in identical acts. This
is done to deepen the ongoing demonization of these two countries/ governments, and subconsciously, the people.
Because these two nations are in the cross-hair of the perpetual war reptilians pushing for global enslavement of humans, and these 2 nations are the
only ones standing in the way.