It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Deetermined
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: UKTruth
Joseph Mifsud met with Durham's team this past Summer (2019).
www.washingtontimes.com...
Unlike the Washington Post, the Washington Times has a good reputation.
Based on your link, it looks like Durham's team met with Mifsud's attorney who only played a recording for them of Mifsud that was recorded in May 2018.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Deetermined
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: UKTruth
Joseph Mifsud met with Durham's team this past Summer (2019).
www.washingtontimes.com...
Unlike the Washington Post, the Washington Times has a good reputation.
Based on your link, it looks like Durham's team met with Mifsud's attorney who only played a recording for them of Mifsud that was recorded in May 2018.
Durham is combing through former CIA Director John Brennan's communications and documents. He'll get to the bottom of things. As William Barr said last week, "These things take time".
Personally, I would prefer Durham just go to Clapper and ask him about the meeting where Obama gave the order to Spy on the Trump campaign. Work from the top-down.
RETIRED ADM. MICHAEL ROGERS, former director of the National Security Agency, has been cooperating with the Justice Department’s probe into the origins of the counterintelligence investigation of the Trump presidential campaign’s alleged ties to Russia, according to four people familiar with Rogers’s participation.
Rogers has met the prosecutor leading the probe, Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham, on multiple occasions, according to two people familiar with Rogers’s cooperation. While the substance of those meetings is not clear, Rogers has cooperated voluntarily, several people with knowledge of the matter said.
Rogers, who retired in May 2018, did not respond to requests for comment.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth
There were no human assets inserted into the trump campaign.
That is what was determined. You are stating the exact opposite of the truth.
originally posted by: Deetermined
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth
There were no human assets inserted into the trump campaign.
That is what was determined. You are stating the exact opposite of the truth.
No, Horowitz only determined that the FBI did not use confidential human sources. He's not the Inspector General for the CIA. Durham is currently the one who is investigating their role in all of this, even though he's not the CIA's IG either.
originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: fringeofthefringe
Thank you for reminding me that Horowitz said that the FBI didn't plant anyone INSIDE Trump's campaign, but never said that they weren't working on thwarting his campaign from the outside.