Excessesive Force

a reply to: seedofchucky

Its up to a judge to decide if a law was commited or not. I think???

a reply to: 2Faced

Because even with body cams these same crimes are being commited...

a reply to: vethumanbeing

This is not a revolution

a reply to: vethumanbeing

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion

a reply to: andy06shake

Not saying to eliminate guns from the police force

a reply to: RickyD

And sometimes takes hours, days, weeks, months to reach a final disposistion.

a reply to: vethumanbeing

Thank u for your honesty

a reply to: andy06shake

Thank u for your understanding

a reply to: randomtangentsrme

If ur job is to carry a gun around, whats the difference between a crooked cop and a gang member?

a reply to: andy06shake

Have u ever seen the movie rampage? The movie is based on real events.

a reply to: sine.nomine

I absolutely agree on the better education, ill add protocol.

a reply to: andy06shake

Police are people. People make mistakes. I get that, but if u are a force, you should learn as that force. Everyone was created equally. Police officers are there to assist an investigation? A investigator prepares documents for the district attorney, and judge? A district attorney gathers as much as they can from the investegators. The honorable judge, dictates what is real and not real. The judge or jury decides if this was edvidence beyond a unreasonable doubt.

a reply to: thefourthjokerscard

So you want the cops disarmed and they can call firefighters (also unarmed) or the army if they need armed response?

Makes total sense.

a reply to: thefourthjokerscard

You can't protect and serve without a pistol.

The media has taken every opportunity they can to make the police look like bad guys. Pay attention to the law, obey it, don't run, and everything will be fine.

What would you rather have here... People who obeyed the law and showed courtesy or disarmed police who can no longer help you? These guys are just doing their job. They don't know who or what they're up against from one situation to the next.

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: 2Faced

originally posted by: beyondknowledge
How does having guns or not affect police use of excessive force? Example: Rodney King

Street cops should be under constant and real-time scrutiny. If you want to prevent them from being arrogant trigger-happy, puppy killing bastards with low regard for the public, they should feel eyes in their backs 24/7. Why? Because as soon as a newbie cop leaves the academy and hits the locker-room of his/her new precinct, they’ll be submitted to peer pressure from the veterans full of piss and vinegar.

You know this as a fact how? You sound petulant; did you fail academy entrance exams? Street cops bad; other?! desk jockey cops good.

We'll always have those people that never think ahead.

a reply to: thefourthjokerscard

Eliminate the guns period would be my thinking on the matter.

Although i realize its not exactly the most realistic goal, especially where the US is concerned.

a reply to: thefourthjokerscard

In theory, i don't disagree with that, then again absolute power corrupts absolutely.

An honorable judge is probably a lot like an honorable Police these days, meaning few and far between.

a reply to: thefourthjokerscard

I've been on a few. LoL

But no, ive never seen that movie, might give it a go if its any good?

a reply to: Shamrock6
What, did I make to much sense there?

a reply to: thefourthjokerscard

Except the bad guys are all armed.
Not a level playing field.