The Republican Hypocrisy

www.votetoimpeach.org...

Your going to need far more than that site to get any type of impeachment process going. A start though....futile at best.

Might want to read this....impeachment process...:
www.lawschool.cornell.edu...

regards
seekerof

[Edited on 11-7-2003 by Seekerof]

Let's see what Sec. of State said......

www.freerepublic.com...

Yes, Powell, indeed.

A parade of fools and liars... first the CIA, then the White House, then Rumsfeld, then Bush, 'finally' (or more accurately 'penultimately' Powell says Bush need not have apologised...

Pick the scapegoat. Easy, isn't it?

Learn your lesson in lying, obfuscation, cover-up and damage control well, and see that lying about lying does you no good.

Two wrongs don't make a right, etc.

President Bush said Friday that intelligence services cleared his State of the Union speech, which included a now-discredited allegation that Iraq was seeking to buy nuclear material from Africa.

"I gave a speech to the nation that was cleared by the intelligence services," the president said.

CBS News reported Thursday that senior administration officials say the president's apparently mistaken claim was included in the Jan. 28 speech over the CIA's initial objections.

But the president's national security adviser specifically said the CIA had vetted the speech. If CIA Director George Tenet had any misgivings about that sentence in the president's speech, "he did not make them known" to Mr. Bush or his staff, said Condoleezza Rice.

However, the CIA reportedly did make its objections known to Britain as early as September. And Secretary of State Colin Powell did not repeat the claim in his Feb. 5 testimony to the Security Council.

www.cbsnews.com...

In other words, BUSH LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND KNEW HE WAS LYING TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHEN HE WAS LYING!

You two should be a couple..............

Originally posted by Tyriffic
Let's see what Sec. of State said......

www.freerepublic.com...

This is sad proof Powell is another scummy liar. He pretends that bush was right to include something that was "perfectly reasonable" at that time (although the CIA had warned the white house almost a year before that, that the WMD claims were likely being fantasy), while he excluded that very same "info" from his own speech on grounds it was "shaky". Now what, was it shaky or reasonable ???


These republicans are so entwined in their lies they don't even know what they said yesterday


[Edited on 13-7-2003 by Mokuhadzushi]

Originally posted by Mokuhadzushi

Originally posted by Tyriffic
Let's see what Sec. of State said......

www.freerepublic.com...

This is sad proof Powell is another scummy liar. He pretends that bush was right to include something that was "perfectly reasonable" at that time (although the CIA had warned the white house almost a year before that, that the WMD claims were likely being fantasy), while he excluded that very same "info" from his own speech on grounds it was "shaky". Now what, was it shaky or reasonable ???


These republicans are so entwined in their lies they don't even know what they said yesterday


[Edited on 13-7-2003 by Mokuhadzushi]

Such language.....Lies...etc, Lies..etc,....ok, they are all scummy liars, the whole lot. You win. Next!!


As I posted in another thread(? It's hard to keep up with the anti govt stuff) the war was not soley based on yellow cake from Niger.......not even close to it.........!

Originally posted by Tyriffic
As I posted in another thread(? It's hard to keep up with the anti govt stuff) the war was not soley based on yellow cake from Niger.......not even close to it.........!

Yeah, there was the link IraQalQaeda right ?

another bushist lie to the abused american people

I find it to be quite hilarious that the Democrats found it all to be quite "gulliable" also...not counting the multitude of nations........

BTW:





regards
seekerof

[Edited on 14-7-2003 by Seekerof]

Originally posted by Mokuhadzushi

Originally posted by Tyriffic
As I posted in another thread(? It's hard to keep up with the anti govt stuff) the war was not soley based on yellow cake from Niger.......not even close to it.........!

Yeah, there was the link IraQalQaeda right ?

another bushist lie to the abused american people

Well>>>expletive inserted here to translate>>>>it seems AlKillya had some land in northern Iraq practicing for the next 9/11 passion play.....

Im already tired of reading your expletive laden pots.

And who are these abused Americans??
Has water stopped running, gas rationed, no TV??...oh, you're right! I woke up this morning and my hot water took 2 minutes to get hot!!!

The agony!!!

Thank you Seekerof for posting that completely accurate Editorial of the Democrats.

Saddam murders 300,000 people.

Bush lies to citizens because they are too lazy to care about a second hitler..."Not our problem," says apathetic citizen.

Lies work, citizens go "Hurray get rid of Saddam the evil Ogre".

Democrats, keeping in touch with their mascot, make (name of their mascot) of themselves by ignoring the said 300,000 murders, just to further thier political agenda.

Score one more for democracy in the hands of imbeciles!!

Originally posted by Colonel

Originally posted by Tyriffic

Originally posted by Colonel
Grow up and get a life. The only reason why you're harping on what I said so much is because you fear it might be true. If it wasn't, you'd have dropped it a long time ago or brought some insult of your own which you obviously don't have the wit for.

Ok.
Unlike you I assume, I am a man, and have been for many years. Also, as a man, I take responsibility for my mistakes when they are pointed out to me. If I offend, I will apologize, unlike you, who has not the capacity to do either- you need to take stock of who you think you are, because you are not all that.

Your second request.
You seem to honestly think the world thinks as you do- bring insult after insult like the playground child you are, and when no insult is forthcoming you ask for one??

I keep harping on this in the hope you will show some guts and say what you really mean by the comment you made. I have revealed it's meaning in a small way already. Your vulgar mind does'nt seem to be able to come to grips with civility in this matter. I can insult you all day and not add a bit of quality to my life- actually, none whatsoever. Calling me an uncle tom reveals the nature of your self-hatred.

Buh bye.

Ok, I apologize for the cut. Sometines, i see a free shot and i take it, even tho it may be below the belt.

Sorry, I just saw this....Apology accepted....maybe we can drop the Glocks and go hand to hand instead!??

Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
Lies, more lies and (now) 'damned statistics'!

FreeMason:

Please cross-reference with:

* total raw votes received, 2000 Election (in other words, you currently live in minority rule, which must irk you)

We lived in a minority rule during Clinton administration.

Nothing is perfect. Well, A fresh Krispy Kreme donut comes really close to perfection, but in the political world, nothing is perfect.

Originally posted by FreeMason
Thank you Seekerof for posting that completely accurate Editorial of the Democrats.

Saddam murders 300,000 people.

Bush lies to citizens because they are too lazy to care about a second hitler..."Not our problem," says apathetic citizen.

Lies work, citizens go "Hurray get rid of Saddam the evil Ogre".

Democrats, keeping in touch with their mascot, make (name of their mascot) of themselves by ignoring the said 300,000 murders, just to further thier political agenda.

Score one more for democracy in the hands of imbeciles!!

You're really ridiculous, you know that? A second Hitler? Then, why weren't the other Arab nations afraid of him conquering them? In fact, they were against the invasion (no, not liberation. Tell the truth for once, republican).

And now, you excuse LYING to kill 5,500 innocent Iraqis, 200 Americans and counting, and spending 4 billion a month for the exercise. But, won't excuse it when you are obsessing over Clinton's penis.

Republican: (secretly snatches vaseline) "Where's that Starr Report, dammit? I need some privacy in the bathroom to sort out the evil details of that philanderer!"

(BTW those 300,000 Iraqi dead were with our help. Reagan and Bush 1 gave him the tools for the slaughter)

You assume an aweful lot.

One: I don't bash Clinton for his involvements in Iraq.

Two: Reagan and Bush Sr. Did not support Saddam's murdering of those people. But the UN did by not allowing us to destroy him in 1991.

That was a time we listened to the UN...they were wrong...deadly wrong.

Most of the 300,000+ dead were done with bullets....not our weapons.