Ghislaine Maxwell planning TV tell-all about Epstein scandal

originally posted by: KKLOCO

This makes a lot of sense. My only question would be, why would the CIA or Mossad care about exonerating the Prince? Because that was the emphasis in the article for her motivation to do the interview.

That's a good question and I've been wondering myself. My best guess -- and probably the most obvious answer -- is that they still need Prince Andrew for some reason, and therefore need to rebuild his reputation for their purposes. My best guess is that Ghislaine will describe Andy as a "poor little prince" with so many entitlements and privileges, but naive and unsophisticated due to his oh-so-protected and sheltered upbringing. He isn't bad... just horny like any other red-blooded young man. He just wanted to have a little fun donchaknow!

And that may be mostly the truth. Everything that has been "revealed" about Andy is pretty vanilla these days. In fact, as scandalous as it sounds, the age of consent in London is 16, so even sex with then-17-year-olds is unsavory but not criminal. There are no claims (that I've heard at least) of him forcing himself on anyone. No claims of pedophilia. No claims of bestiality. I'm not in any way trying to defend Prince Andrew; it just seems to me that it could be sooooooo much worse, so why is so much being made of so little? Perhaps deep pockets? In other words, since the victims cannot sue Epstein any longer, they're setting their sites Prince Andrew?

But that may not suit the purposes of the real puppet masters. If they still need Prince Andrew for some reason -- for connections and for access to others in his "circle" or his family -- then they may have decided damage control was in order after that disastrous interview and being cut off and demoted by the Queen. That's about all I can figure for now. Maybe with more information that will change.

What if she was Epstein's handler? It seems she played a large role in introducing him to various influential people as well as recruiting underage girls to have sex with said influential people.
That would explain why she's still alive and how she's managed to hide this whole time.

originally posted by: eletheia

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes

I would hazard a guess that there are hundreds if not thousands of people caught up in this web.

Bill Clinton at the top of the list?

We already know about him. Not that anyone’s doing anything about it though. You know, our former president of 8 years is a raging pedo. Carry on, nothing to see here...

originally posted by: trollz
What if she was Epstein's handler? It seems she played a large role in introducing him to various influential people as well as recruiting underage girls to have sex with said influential people.
That would explain why she's still alive and how she's managed to hide this whole time.

THAT, makes a hell of a lot of sense. We already know her father was incredibly connected. From my understanding, it’s very common for children to follow in their parents footsteps, in that profession.

Who is conducting the interview? Matt Lauer?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Boadicea

She's just trying to play CYA right now, this scumbucktet needs to be on record during a deposition.

Very true. But also makes me curious and brings up a whole bunch of new questions. Ghislaine knows she's not going to get authorities "off her back" with an interview. And would only potentially alert them to her whereabouts when she is presumably "in hiding" from them. It is specifically stated an "American" news agency, so presumably on US soil?

No. That's just stupid. She's not going to risk her best interests to "defend" Prince Andrew from what basically amounts to gossip for these purposes. And she cannot protect him from either criminal nor civil liability with an interview.

Nope. She's doing this for other purposes. I'm just not sure what (or whose) purposes!

a reply to: Wide-Eyes

Probably because he screwed up and she will be used as damage control.

It's gonna be interesting to say the least.

Their damage control sucks. If the prince would have stayed silent I think more people would have believed him.
This lady is only going to make things worse. ha

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
I would hazard a guess that there are hundreds if not thousands of people caught up in this web.

I'm sure it's a decent amount, however I don't care who they are, they need to be held accountable.

originally posted by: KKLOCO

originally posted by: eletheia

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes

I would hazard a guess that there are hundreds if not thousands of people caught up in this web.

Bill Clinton at the top of the list?

We already know about him. Not that anyone’s doing anything about it though. You know, our former president of 8 years is a raging pedo. Carry on, nothing to see here...

As I said in another thread, zero of these girls have said that Clinton ever touched them. I believe he's a scum of the earth rapist, but none of his victims have come forward so nobody has anything to charge him with.

a reply to: KKLOCO

This is such a PR disinformation piece. Guaranteed she paid off someone at the post to say a major network wanted her interview so an actual network would scramble to get it.
Also, the move makes her seem credible to the general readership, because why would anyone interview a person who procured children for a pedophile and market it as a "tell-all". 🙄🙄🙄 Great paid piece Ghislane. Good thing her family knows the business.

originally posted by: Boadicea
I'm just not sure what (or whose) purposes!

I think it's laying the groundwork for trying to control the public perception.

originally posted by: Boadicea
My best guess -- and probably the most obvious answer -- is that they still need Prince Andrew for some reason, and therefore need to rebuild his reputation for their purposes. My best guess is that Ghislaine will describe Andy as a "poor little prince" with so many entitlements and privileges, but naive and unsophisticated due to his oh-so-protected and sheltered upbringing. He isn't bad... just horny like any other red-blooded young man.

Not that young! His older daughter would have only been 3/4 years younger

than Virginia Roberts at the time.

Everything that has been "revealed" about Andy is pretty vanilla these days. In fact, as scandalous as it sounds, the age of consent in London is 16, so even sex with then-17-year-olds is unsavory but not criminal.

It is not so much the under age........but that she was trafficked by Epstein,

and he paid her to sleep with Andrew in Ghislaine's London home.

In other words, since the victims cannot sue Epstein any longer, they're setting their sites Prince Andrew?

The 'victims are apparently suing Epstein's estate.......Loads of money there!

But that may not suit the purposes of the real puppet masters. If they still need Prince Andrew for some reason -- for connections then they may have decided damage control was in order after that disastrous interview and being cut off and demoted by the Queen

He has been doing dodgy finiancial dealings for himself while representing

the UK as a trade ambassador.

Damage control ? that interview will follow him forever!!

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
I would hazard a guess that there are hundreds if not thousands of people caught up in this web.

I'm sure it's a decent amount, however I don't care who they are, they need to be held accountable.

Absolutely but we can be pretty sure that it will never happen.

originally posted by: LordAhriman

As I said in another thread, zero of these girls have said that Clinton ever touched them. I believe he's a scum of the earth rapist,

It is on flight records that he visited Epstein's Island several times, you dont

suppose he was there doing janitorial duties ?.......

but none of his victims have come forward so nobody has anything to charge him with.

I read somewhere that FBI agents found lots or recording equipment on

the island so I bet someone has inherited a quantity of blackmail material?

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
Absolutely but we can be pretty sure that it will never happen.

Nope, if it were going to happen it would have happened by now.

originally posted by: eletheia

Not that young! His older daughter would have only been 3/4 years younger than Virginia Roberts at the time.

Fair enough... perspective is everything...

It is not so much the under age........but that she was trafficked by Epstein, and he paid her to sleep with Andrew in Ghislaine's London home.

Again, scandalous but not criminal on Andy's part.

The 'victims are apparently suing Epstein's estate.......Loads of money there!

Well, maybe... maybe not. Cases have been filed, but may also be dismissed. Technically, the statute of limitations has run out on most/all of the cases, and although NY has recently changed the law, and more changes are being considered, they probably cannot legally sue. This is a "test case," to try to change the law through litigation:

Mr. Boies said he intended to test a clause in New York State law that allowed plaintiffs to file lawsuits within a year of the termination of a criminal case against a defendant. In Mr. Epstein’s case, the clock on such claims began on Aug. 29, when federal prosecutors dismissed a sex-trafficking indictment against him after his suicide at the Manhattan Correctional Center.

Why These 5 Accusers of Jeffrey Epstein Want More Than Money
As I understand it though, England has no specific statute of limitations.

He has been doing dodgy finiancial dealings for himself while representing the UK as a trade ambassador.

Apparently so... which I wonder if those dodgy dealings are more incriminating in reality than the sexual allegations. Perhaps some of those dodgy dealings are actually criminal.

originally posted by: eletheia
It is on flight records that he visited Epstein's Island several times, you dont

suppose he was there doing janitorial duties ?.......

We all know what he was doing there, but there's no proof. Flying on that jet and visiting that island are not illegal. Until victims speak up, there's nothing that can be done to him.

a reply to: KKLOCO

If she isn't suddenly found with a random case of suicide it will be super unlikely that this will be anything special. She will defend her actions saying she had no clue what was happening that everything that has been claimed against her is untrue and that she was a dupe.

Although I predict she will come down with a case of the Suicide before any interview or her car will crash or she will be hit by a space rock etc. etc. etc. The powerful who REALLY control things will not let this happen.

a reply to: KKLOCO

Additionally, why hasn’t this woman been indicted? Nope, instead she gets to sit in a cushy chair and lie...ahem tell her BS side of the story.

There is just something about this story...