Like many thought the Douma Chemical attact (Syria) was a false flag

Back in 2018 there was much discussion about the supposedly Chemical attack in Douma, Syria as many of our members called B.S. on the whole narrative of Asaad gassing Douma.

Leaked emails and findings about doctors reports are finally being released without the filter of the OPCW saying otherwise. The reports were in hand but ignored by the OPCW for their final report because they did not help in the Chemical attack narrative.

Some may remember the video of the kids and grown ups being washed down and given oxygen... These people were living underground during the supposedly attack and were almost suffocated by the amount of dust and debris raining down in their tunnels. Toxicology test showed no chlorine poisoning for anyone. Read again no Chlorine gas poisoning !

Many have already made up their minds or have forgotten the whole thing by now but for me when a false flag is exposed it should be remembered for no other reason than be be on guard for the next one.. The whole thing was to draw an American, British, and French response which was successful if judged by all the Tomahawk missiles fired...
www.activistpost.com...

This week on The Corbett Report podcast, James goes through the remarkable timeline of the Douma hoax and breaks the spell that the propagandists have sought to cast on the public.

youtu.be...

This should be front page news. The UN chemical weapons watchdog has suppressed evidence from their own investigative team because it did not fit their politically motivated report.


Two whistleblowers from the OPCW inspection team have revealed that key evidence collected on the ground in Syria was omitted from the report. This included ballistics analysis that showed that the impact craters were inconsistent with the theory that the canisters had been dropped from the sky (which implies that they were planted) and toxicology samples that showed no difference in the chlorine saturation in samples collected at the site compared to samples from the surrounding area (implying there was no attack).


The former Director General of the OPCW, José Bustani, along with a panel of experts met with the whistleblowers in Brussels and unanimously criticized the OPCW for 'Unacceptable Practices' in describing the omission of key evidence collected by the team.

The question you should be asking yourself is who does this benefit. Why was this such an important issue for jerad kushner and trumps daughter? Also who supplied the intelligence on this? I will give you a hint they all have something in common. The intelligence community and trumps foreign advisors should answer for this massive F-up and trumps daughter and kushner should shut the F-up! Ps the left wing media expected trump to do more but they applauded him for acting on this like a massive group of idiots the same thing with neocons!

We all knew this was bullish!t and I honestly think it’s about time to address this issue with our greatest allies and it caused a lot of tension with Russia and Syria who had been helping to fight off terrorist. I can post an article that basically states the country who we all know faked the intelligence and video talking about how they want to keep terrorist in that region.

Instead we get the left concocting a impeachment trial over a phone conversation and trump basically telling the people who caused this mess our greatest ally they are a national treasure. I do like trump but he’s extremely blind to these people screwing us over! The left wing media won’t say anything about this because they wanted it and the right wing media won’t say anything because they wanted it.

I still remember the day trump did this because his daughter and her husband wanted it and it still pissed me off. It’s about time to address the glaringly obvious fact that Israel almost caused a war over this with their fake intel and fake victims.

Also this kind of proves the lefts agenda with the Russia gate hoax. Why did the left pick Russia of all places to link trump too? They hung the investigation over trumps head and pushed the bs Russia hoax throughout the media non stop they pushed trump into a compromised position based off lies of chemical weapons and ruined his chances at diplomacy to solve it because of how it might look. The democrats put everyone in danger with their hoax.

a reply to: 727Sky

The whole notion was ludicrous from the start. They wanted to make me believe how...those "moderate" jihadi rebels were freedom fighters while the president of a country was gassing his own people, while the whole world was watching.

I dont think that anyone bought that burger, at least nobody that didnt have to buy it.

Sadly, the official narrative will stay the same.

a reply to: 727Sky

They are all false flags.. Like the Mexican one everyone went nuts over, the car on fire with NO bodies.

here's a reminder...

Assad was always claiming it was fabricated...

CNN

originally posted by: 727Sky
Back in 2018 there was much discussion about the supposedly Chemical attack in Douma, Syria as many of our members called B.S. on the whole narrative of Asaad gassing Douma.

Leaked emails and findings about doctors reports are finally being released without the filter of the OPCW saying otherwise. The reports were in hand but ignored by the OPCW for their final report because they did not help in the Chemical attack narrative.

Incorrect. It is simply about reading comprehension. In particular the fact that the two cylinders were assessed to have been dropped from height. This was after extensive independent modelling was done after the report of Ian Henderson who came to his conclusion that they were placed there.

the final report devotes extensive and detailed discussion to the modelling of the impact of the two cylinders in pages 53-64. Three independent analyses by experts in three different countries were carried out, and all reached complimentary conclusions: the damage at the impact sites is consistent with the cylinders having fallen from height (Annex 12).

]It should also be noted that the engineering studies were only received by the FFM in December 2018, well after the date of this letter. As such, any discussion about the point of impact on the date of this letter would have been superseded by the studies which came later.

Bellincat Link addressing the discrepencies.

It has been revealed that Ian Henderson was not a member of the OPCW Fact Finding Mission but a consultant. His findings and assessment did not meet the strict criteria of the FFM team. The later analysis by the dedicated teams tasked with that mission found that the canisters had fallen from height.

For now, the OPCW is not directly responding to the document. Instead, according to the Group, the OPCW press office said Henderson “has never been a member of the FFM [Fact-Finding Mission]”, indicating that he had a consultant’s role

The OPCW also comments that Henderson’s “engineering sub-team was not part of the FFM’s investigation”. An official said the FFM’s report was based on analysis from experts working in three different countries.

From

Article by Scott Lucas

Scott Lucas also points out a key error in Henderson's assessment in regards to Location 2. Why did Henderson ignore the impact on the roof and walls?

The Fact Finding Mission offers an explanation, even for those with basic scientific knowledge. In Annex 6 (page 56), the inspectors explain why the deadly cylinder, despite its velocity, lodged in the roof without breaking through:

Observing the damage on the roof above the crater, the experts were able to provide an explanation of the cylinder not penetrating completely through the aperture. It can be seen that there was a large impact on the roof and walls above the balcony. The impact would decrease the velocity of the falling cylinder and changed its trajectory while hitting the concrete floor of the balcony causing a hole in it, but without sufficient energy to fall through it.

Henderson argues against this conclusion, without referring to the roof damage observed by the experts. Instead, he contends that the deformation of part of the cylinder but not of the rest is not consistent with an “intermediate impact”.

You can see images of that damage above the balcony crater at Page 55 Annex 6 of the OPCW final report. Again, why does Henderson not take it into account?

OPCW report link

a reply to: tommyjo
Yes all that is the official narrative and OPCW report. Just as the folks in the hospital were reported being treated for the gas attack yet the toxicology report said no chemical agent was found.

There are enough discrepancies to make one doubt the validity of the OPCW report considering how bad TPTB wanted Asaad removed and were willing to do just about anything to achieve their goals.. Everything about the Syrian invasion (and that is what it was) stunk of lies and deceptions IMO. There will be more coming out on this topic and if I come across another report I will post it.