It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I saw that link, but one thing is missing that was acknowledged, they tried communicating to it and no response.
originally posted by: tommyjo
a reply to: 727Sky
It is an airliner producing an aerodynamic contrail. This has long since been debunked.
Metabunk link
Aerodynamic contrail are a puzzle to a lot of people and that even includes military people.
A contrail such as an aerodynamic one start stopping can be confusing. See this chemtrail believer believing that he has caught a "chemtrail aerosol sprayer". All due to ignorance of aerodynamic contrails.
Aerodynamic Contrails Link
originally posted by: Arnie123
...they tried communicating to it and no response
Also, that post is just like us, it's his opinion and while I do applaud all the research that went into this, this doesn't mean it's been debunked, just that certains do line up, while others don't.
You tell me? It was listed in his rebuttal.
originally posted by: moebius
originally posted by: Arnie123
...they tried communicating to it and no response
What exactly does that mean? How did they try to communicate with it?
Also, that post is just like us, it's his opinion and while I do applaud all the research that went into this, this doesn't mean it's been debunked, just that certains do line up, while others don't.
He is supporting his opinion with evidence though.
What does not line up in your opinion?
originally posted by: RoScoLaz5
a reply to: tommyjo
i'd imagine an experienced helicopter pilot would have encountered 'an airliner producing an aerodynamic contrail' many times in his career, enough to mentally file it away as such without raising an eyebrow.
originally posted by: data5091
a reply to: vlawde
they did, and the Chileans could not explain this video, said it was not a plane, there were none in the area at the time, and that the object was not from here.
originally posted by: moebius
originally posted by: Arnie123
...they tried communicating to it and no response
What exactly does that mean? How did they try to communicate with it?
Reading the original report, the helicopter seems to have tried to call on 121.5. The are a couple of problems with that, Most aircraft dont set that frequency until some time after takeoff which can vary from airline to airline, and if they were listening, unless whoever was calling used their callsign, they wouldn't respond.
The radio coms? Pilots have a lot to do. Why would they think a call, on a generic frequency, to the wrong location was for them? The thermal-camera inexperienced Navy pilots misjudged the distance. They hadnt aligned the camera to get an accurate bearing. They were 'expecting' a result on radar so were surprised when they didnt see it, and didnt think to look further.
originally posted by: Lysergic
Great now we gotta worry about Aliens dumping space aids into the atmosphere.