Mainstream News Media Promoting Draq Queen Children/Boys is Child Exploitation

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lumenari

What in the presentation of Drag Queen Story Hour was sexual again?

The part where you have your head up your ass about sexuality.

ETA... that was snarky and you kinda almost deserve an honest response.

When children grow up and see two obviously different (physically, mentally) sexes then they can either identify with one or the other of them as they grow up.

When children grow up with 52 or 127 different sexes then it tends to confuse them... and that should be the least of their worries.

Parenting should be a real thing... not something you see on the View and pass it on to your kid.

You think drag is about gender identity and sexuality?

BWAHAHAHA.

Thank you kindly for the answer. Drag is performance art intended to be fun. The fact that you and the other autocratic prudes can’t apparently comprehend that is disappointing but not totally unexpected.

I had hoped somehow you had a bit more cultivated argument than some of the zealots, sadly, your post is proof that is not the case.

My bad for giving your post more credit than due.

Personally, I think drag queens reading stories to young children is ... silly.

However, it’s no different from having someone portraying a character reading to the kids ... so this hue and cry is equally silly.

I’m in favor of everyone having the freedom to make their own choices, which includes performing for kids, taking your kids to such a performance, or deciding that’s not something you want your kids exposed to.

Easy peasy. Live and let live. Mind your own business and let others mind theirs.

Parades are geared towards children.

Pride parades promote deviant sex as fun, so expose it to all the impressionable toddlers, like it's a great big party!

What fun, kids! Balloons and candy for all, so tell your parents about it! All the celebrities will be on floats, and so will the mayor, with his kids!

I'm not against homosexuals, or whatever, but I find promoting sexual attraction in parades as rather despicable, and the same goes for promoting ANY sort of sexual behavior in parades. It's sick, and twisted.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ChefFox

As a parent, you have the ability to control what your child is exposed to.

If you don't want your children exposed to drag queens, don't take them to places where drag queens might be.

If you don't think that your child will be affected by the presence of a drag queen then it's not a concern.

I'm sure you feel the same way about exposing children to porn, drugs, etc?

I mean, seriously, there has to be a line.

Any 'parent' that chooses to expose their kids to this garbage is guilty of child abuse. Period.

a reply to: ChefFox

The gay agenda is targeting white boys!!! You read it here. The agenda of the leftist swine is trying to corrupt our good white boys and make them evil drag queens😆😆😆

Comparing dressing in a costume to porn and drugs??? You okay? I mean seriously wow....

originally posted by: Joecanada11
Comparing dressing in a costume to porn and drugs??? You okay? I mean seriously wow....

Yes, seriously. Wow.

Anyone who doesn't see a problem with exposing children to this aberrant nonsense... well, they should get some help.

Seriously.

a reply to: tanstaafl

Its a #ing costume dude!!!

This is just my opinion, but these freaks shouldn't be let around children.

EVER.

a reply to: Joecanada11

Comparing dressing in a costume to porn and drugs???

This is a serious issue, children are being exposed to adults who are pretending and impersonating women while a few drag queens had being reported to flash in public at a library in front of children.

a reply to: turbonium1

You’ve never been to a Pride parade, have you?

Nothing to do with attracting kids.

a reply to: ChefFox

LOL ...

I’m so glad we’re post-racism in the US.

Good afternoon, or evening...even good morning...

Manners are a thing!!

This is a subject that, obviously, is somewhat touchy, with opinions strongly held.

That's great!! However...

Expressing them while calling other members names isn't on. Stop doing it. Expressing concern about fellow members mental health is not on, either. Stop doing it. Ad hom attacks will stop.

I trust that this is clearly understood??

DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS POST!!

a reply to: ChefFox
I really don't know about the racial percentages, other than what I have seen myself, they span all races. Maybe the percentages follow racial census too? But the political sensitivity about the young drag boys being white, is an interesting point. That is all I've ever seen. So you might be right that race might be more highly charged. I still think many people care though about this behavior in public by children is skirting the boundary of moral decency. Possibly due to the inroads, or erosion of these morals, by all the kiddie pageants on cable TV and the internet.
Now it is okay.

a reply to: reddogbom

Starting out doing drag is expensive.

It’s probably not a racial thing as much as it’s an economic class thing.

Even though Segull did not want a reply, I think Mr. Rogers said it better:

"Our society is much more interested in information than wonder, in noise rather than silence...And I feel that we need a lot more wonder and a lot more silence in our lives"

a reply to: tanstaafl

So you think the state should determine what a child should be exposed to instead of the parents?

a reply to: Gryphon66

The problem is that drag queens, while characters, are adult characters and part of adult entertainment not meant to be aimed at kids. It would be equally inappropriate to have Deadpool come read a story while thoroughly in character. Even though he's tecvhnically a superhero, he's not kud friendly, nor was he ever meant to be. If the person portraying Deadpool is doing it right he'd be every bit as offensive as a drag queen, honestly so a well-played Eric Cartman and he's a cartoon character to begin with.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: tanstaafl

So you think the state should determine what a child should be exposed to instead of the parents?

Libraries are publicly funded. In this case, the state is making that decision, DC.

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: tanstaafl

So you think the state should determine what a child should be exposed to instead of the parents?

Libraries are publicly funded. In this case, the state is making that decision, DC.

True, but no child is mandated to attend the library.