-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -22-

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

Illuminatus! Trilogy P. 319

"Tobias Knight," I said, "of the FBI, the CIA, the A:.A:. and the Illuminati."

He blinked briefly. "I've met double agents and triple agents, but you're the first quadruple agent in my experience. I guess this was inevitable, by the Law of Fives. Welcome to the fifth ring of the world's oldest continuous Five Ring Circus. Prepare for Death and Rebirth."

I though I had seen that somwhere. It only took 30 years to make the connection. Not bad.

a reply to: PokeyJoe

WUT?!! Trump 4EVA... A do-over? Can hardly wait to hear his justification and where he is quoting/getting this law info.
Color me intrigued.

Pic

11:33:09
8:39

:39

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
a reply to: PokeyJoe

WUT?!! Trump 4EVA... A do-over? Can hardly wait to hear his justification and where he is quoting/getting this law info.
Color me intrigued.

Gotta be bait, right? DJT has gotten the "opposition" to literally say if he is elected again it will be fraud, and, since he will be elected again we have to impeach him to prevent him from being elected.

He got Pelosi to say his presence in office is too important to leave to the voters, but having him in office threatens democracy - nvm...

Bait.

a reply to: crankyoldman

It's interesting how there are people out there who don't see it, don't see that they are saying right to our faces why they are doing what they're doing. That admit it's got nothing to do with laws, it's about removing him because they don't like or want him in the WH.

They confess THEIR crimes every day and the left just looks on in its usual braindead stupor.

originally posted by: LanceCorvette
a reply to: PokeyJoe

"No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once."

The 22nd Amendment could be repealed. It wasn't even till 1951 that we started the two-term rule. Tradition was just always followed, until FDR was elected four times. Also, that 5th word, 'elected', adds some vagueness, if you can imagine.

President Trump has been robbed by these false accusations and investigations. He has been able to accomplish a lot, but imagine the winning that we would be experiencing today had the Dems and their mouthpieces from the enemedia not stolen this time from him.

a reply to: CoramDeo

Better late than never.
How in the world did you find that one? (rhetoric). 👀

Nice find. Quite the interesting cult fantasy trilogy! Historical and imaginary I think the authors were trippin on something(s) back then. 😂

originally posted by: Creep Thumper
a reply to: crankyoldman


They confess THEIR crimes every day and the left just looks on in its usual braindead stupor.

A most astute and HIGHLY missed point.

That is exactly what is being done - public declaration/demonstration of their crimes - an Allocution of sorts. What is interesting is they've been forced to do it for three years and counting.

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

trippin on 100% pure uncut woke Truth

remember Patrick Byrne? from 2018

Soros Fund Becomes Number 3 Shareholder of Overstock…

George Soros’ investment fund became the third-largest shareholder in the pro-cryptocurrency retailer Overstock last year, data shows, according to an article published by CNBC on Thursday, Feb. 15.

Patrick Byrne’s online platform became the first major corporation of its type to accept Bitcoin for payments in 2014, a practice it continued before announcing a new trading-focused venture in September.

link

originally posted by: Mike Stivic


I find it distasteful to speculate the gender of a child.

I disagree with the agenda driving the thunburg media phenomena. I want to make that clear.

But this sort of speculation diminishes this thread In My Opinion.


Respectfully,
~meathead

And to add to your very good point. It wouldn't matter anyway. All the matters is data related. The Left can be emotional about it but the data is not in their favor. The tweaked data alone hurts the whole theory. And the hard data that is intentionally ignored destroys it.

a reply to: queenofswords

Imagining the winning means a return to the old way of doing business where both sides come to the table. Barring an utter housecleaning and national change of attitude, that isn't going to happen even with utter vindication in the courts.

Be glad if he's re-elected and gets another term.

About the data.

Any good scientist using statistics has to decide the margin of error for the probable range of data. The margin of error they choose is very minute and not within any range I have every used in practice.

"Margin of Error" is set based on accuracy of measurement within the full range of possible data points. Full Scale for Earths Temps is over 100 F and over 80 C from hottest to coldest points. Everyone would agree I would think that if the margin was set at 15% that this would be entirely to high for acceptable data. We could start the debate there at 15 but I suggest the standard of 5% margin of error. But if we say chose 3% the expected changes and observed are well withing the margin of error and is considered a trend but noise as far as significance of the change actually means.

Couple the margin of error with the fudged data so that the actual hottest average temps meet the narrative of more taxes and we are done. Time to kick this failed theory related to a sick money and power grab out of our vernacular. That whole theory goes in the pile with a Chevy Vega and a Ford Pinto. They all looked good for a few days but failed miserably to live up to a thing predicted. So, Why continue propping up a failed concept that steals funds and shutters business?

a reply to: crankyoldman

Probably true, yes. But, still may be interesting to see how Huckabee is going to spin this one.
Would be a hoot if he had someone like Turley sitting beside him just nodding yes.

That would be the ultimate head exploder.

a reply to: Trillium

Wow, kudos Trillium... well done!

Mornings with Maria interview with Carter Page. A few new tidbits of info if you, like myself, haven't read the entire report.

Fascinating "Q" exit polls in the UK general election tonight:

These exit polls are obviously more manipulable and just a forecast but it looks like someone has built Q messaging into them:

Conservatives........... 368 = 3+6+8 = 17 = Q
Labour.................... 191 = 1+9+1 = 11 = deep state
Scottish National Party.................. 55 = 5by5 = Eyes On
Liberal Democrats....................... 13 = cabal

Conservative gains.. 50
Labour losses......... 71 = Q mirrored


At what point does it become mathematically impossible?

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
Fascinating "Q" exit polls in the UK general election tonight:

These exit polls are obviously more manipulable and just a forecast but it looks like someone has built Q messaging into them:

Conservatives........... 368 = 3+6+8 = 17 = Q
Labour.................... 191 = 1+9+1 = 11 = deep state
Scottish National Party.................. 55 = 5by5 = Eyes On
Liberal Democrats....................... 13 = cabal

Conservative gains.. 50
Labour losses......... 71 = Q mirrored


At what point does it become mathematically impossible?

That's just nuts.

Some reporter/cameraman got caught taking photos of a republican's notes in the House Judiciary committee. Just as importantly, notice who fails to pay attention and stop them.

twitter

clip

Brought up right here. Yes it is an abuse of power for personal gain, as they have all said they are not, and cannot be objective on impeachMENT.

It is also conflict of interest.