It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Gryphon66
The quote i typed from above from vindman was about his conversation with his counterpart on July 31, after the july 25 phone call.
Its on the section I posted, you just cant or wont read it.
Nope, that’s your rather desperate assertion. It is not borne out by the remainder of the transcript. Ratcliffe BADGERS VIndman to say what you so desperately want him to say and he refuses to do so because IT’S NOT THE TRUTH.
And you’re choosing to put this slimy Ratcliffe up on a pedestal while you besmirch the name of a decorated war-hero like Vindman.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Gryphon66
What is obscene is for an unelected official to admit he told his counterpart to not listen to a request from the president, because it would be getting involved in domestic politics.
What is obscene for that mans lawyers to treat a member of congress with such disdain.
originally posted by: Scapegrace
originally posted by: ManFromEurope
a reply to: carewemust
Wait. What?
Now someone who defies to follow illegal orders is called a traitor?
What is the current narrative of the Ukranian story right now? By the rightwings? Trump did everything okay?
Well, why am I asking this in this kind of thread anyway. Of course he is right. Even if he isn't.
What exactly was illegal, and what orders did Vindman receive? I genuinely want to know.