It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: underwerks
Not only the YouTube personality ... in this case.
We all have different opinions about things. I’m just continually amazed that these dipstick assertions get made when it’s sooo easy to discover the actual facts.
originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Anathros
I think the only people Donald Trump has are the people who would have voted for him anyway. In an age where his divisional politics have forced people who wouldn’t normally care about politics to become engaged, it isn’t enough to not lose any voters.
If you aren’t gaining voters to match the ones you’re creating on the other side, you’re losing.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
You really can’t make this stuff up. Every damn time.
The reality of the situation is, of course, almost exactly opposite to how it was portrayed by the OP.
WYMT - CBS
FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) - A Kentucky judge has ordered the State Board of Elections to return the names of about 175,000 voters to the regular voter rolls. Franklin County Circuit Judge Thomas Wingate issued the ruling Monday in a lawsuit filed last week by the Kentucky Democratic Party. The lawsuit contends placing those voters' names on an "inactive list" could infringe on their right to vote. News outlets report Wingate ordered the board to return the names of all Kentucky voters to one master list and place an asterisk by the names of voters whose addresses need confirmation.
So no, voters were not added to the voting rolls they were restored to the voting rolls because they had been removed unfairly.
There is zero evidence of any voter fraud or election fraud in the KY elections.
You’d never know that from the OP’s presentation, though.
originally posted by: Anathros
originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Anathros
I think the only people Donald Trump has are the people who would have voted for him anyway. In an age where his divisional politics have forced people who wouldn’t normally care about politics to become engaged, it isn’t enough to not lose any voters.
If you aren’t gaining voters to match the ones you’re creating on the other side, you’re losing.
It's all about the heartland and the electoral college. I'm confident Trump will carry the same states if not add to them in 2020. Keep in mind, it was the Democratic party that wanta to get rid of the EC and lower voting ages. That's desperation at it's finest.
originally posted by: Hypntick
a reply to: Gryphon66
Because, as has been shown time and time again in the last couple of years, you don't actually need evidence all you need is an allegation. An allegation has been made, they need to get on it.
originally posted by: andy06shake
...
As to believe, well if everyone were to believe that the election process was corrupt, i don't imagine anyone would have voted in the first place.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: olaru12
Virtually every instance of actual election fraud (voter fraud is so rare in the US as to be non-existent) happens with Republicans.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Anathros
originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Anathros
I think the only people Donald Trump has are the people who would have voted for him anyway. In an age where his divisional politics have forced people who wouldn’t normally care about politics to become engaged, it isn’t enough to not lose any voters.
If you aren’t gaining voters to match the ones you’re creating on the other side, you’re losing.
It's all about the heartland and the electoral college. I'm confident Trump will carry the same states if not add to them in 2020. Keep in mind, it was the Democratic party that wanta to get rid of the EC and lower voting ages. That's desperation at it's finest.
That doesn’t show desperation, it just shows they want to win more easily. America is majorly left leaning. And in a nation where everyones vote was equal they wouldn’t have to really try. A Republican President hasn’t won the popular vote in what, 30 years?
I don’t see Trump gaining anything really. I don’t expect anyone who has personally invested themselves into him as President to see things the way I do though.