It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Fowlerstoad
a reply to: Gryphon66
I totally agree, and further, I don't believe government (ie: taxpayers) should be footing the bill(s) for any of it, either!
originally posted by: Gryphon66
I’m not in favor of government at any level deciding who deserves healthcare and who doesn’t for any reason.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Boadicea
Then you’re still arguing from the unknown.
We don’t know what we don’t know. Moreover, you think that we’re being denied access to the information that probably does exist for ... some reason.
What argument is there to counter any of that?
I’m not talking about or justifying any activists or their points of view here ... pro-con-etc.
I have no problem with people identifying them selves as they choose. I don’t believe that any sort of secondary or official recognition process is needed.
There is a difference between being trans and suffering from gender dysphoria. Yes, there is a relationship, but honestly, if any American wakes up tomorrow morning and decides that they are another gender multi-gendered or no genders at all ... IT DOES NOT MATTER TO ME.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Boadicea
Let me ask you a question Bo. It’s an honest question and isn’t tricky or rhetorical.
What if all the process of transition from evaluation, counseling, hormone supplements to actual gender reassignment surgery ... what if all this is simply an elective.
Let’s take away the rationale of gender dysphoria or even the reality of differing gender identities.
Let’s say that any person desires to change their body. Why can’t they do it? Why do you or I or the government have anything to say about it?
originally posted by: JustJohnny
a reply to: Boadicea
I think a “brass tax” point is this...
Do you think there is a reasonable “cure” for being trans???
originally posted by: JustJohnny
a reply to: tanstaafl
Oh yes they would..
Those cases who were legitimate
and who will continue to live as the other sex,
They would benefit dramatically from transitioning as early as possible.
and thus would be denied healthcare that was in their best interest ..
If a treatment is available, and administered according to the best standards medical science has, that is up to the individual. I’m certainly in favor of giving kids as much control of their lives as is possible including the ability to resist their parents’ overreaching actions, whatever those might be.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Gryphon66
What are your feelings on female genital mutilation?
Some might consider that health care.