It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Klassified
originally posted by: IAMTAT
OP...Why is it bad that a President brings in an advisor familiar with a large percentage of his potential voters?
Common practice I would assume.
Do you think it outrageous because she's a Christian...or because she is a woman?
Maybe both?
He already had one...Pence.
Outrageous? No. His reasoning, beyond pandering to his Christian base, yes.
If you knew any of my post history, you'd know the last question is non-sequitur.
Evidently you dont know that Pence is Vice President and has those duties to attend to.
So there ya go...
originally posted by: Klassified
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Klassified
Why do you hate G-d?
Why would I hate something that has no real evidence of existence? Rephrase the question.
originally posted by: LSU2018
originally posted by: Klassified
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Klassified
Why do you hate G-d?
Why would I hate something that has no real evidence of existence? Rephrase the question.
If that's true then why do you care if Trump put someone in there that does believe in God? Paula believes in God, you don't. So you think she's wrong and you're not. Explain that.
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
Public liason..... She sends out letters to Trump supporters, calm down OP......
originally posted by: Klassified
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
Public liason..... She sends out letters to Trump supporters, calm down OP......
You may want to actually read the OP and articles, as well as my last response to Blaine.
originally posted by: Klassified
originally posted by: LSU2018
originally posted by: Klassified
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Klassified
Why do you hate G-d?
Why would I hate something that has no real evidence of existence? Rephrase the question.
If that's true then why do you care if Trump put someone in there that does believe in God? Paula believes in God, you don't. So you think she's wrong and you're not. Explain that.
See my response to your previous question, and you'll have your answer.
originally posted by: Blaine91555
Joshua DuBois was Obama's equivalent of that. He started the new tradition of White House Easter Prayer Breakfast. Obama was also very much a religious person.
You find it odd that all Presidents cater to the religious crowd that make up the vast majority of their constituents?
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
originally posted by: Klassified
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
Public liason..... She sends out letters to Trump supporters, calm down OP......
You may want to actually read the OP and articles, as well as my last response to Blaine.
I did. You might want to brush up on reading comprehension...
She is the liason between the president, and certain programs. She isn't even a part or member of the committee she is liason to. Her job is to pass information and ideas between the president and that committee.
She's nobody and has no authority... Again, calm down OP.... We,re not beheading infidels lol
Her specific role will reportedly be advising the Trump administration’s Faith and Opportunity Initiative that aims to boost the voice of religious groups in certain government programs...
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Klassified
And you guys have Mayor Pete running for President. He wastes no time lecturing Christians on how they aren't Christian in the right way, and he's still standing on the stage as top candidate. Until you cast him out in a similar purity purge, you have no weight on this topic.
originally posted by: Klassified
originally posted by: Blaine91555
a reply to: Klassified
I guess I'm baffled exactly how this is and issue. A liaison is simply a person who acts as a go between with constituents and since over 80% of his base are religious, or claim to be?
Seems to me you're saying you don't like people of faith, therefore they should be ignored.
The whole we are going to turn into a theocracy thing is just nonsense IMO. That may have been possible 150 years ago or more, but now? Must be a boring news day? No way, no how is the US in danger of becoming a theocracy.
Her specific role will reportedly be advising the Trump administration’s Faith and Opportunity Initiative that aims to boost the voice of religious groups in certain government programs...
That's a bit more than a liaison.
And I said "a haven for dominionists and a quasi-theocracy." I do see a problem with people who want to influence government programs and enact legislation that serves them and their religious ideology rather than the American people.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Blaine91555
Joshua DuBois was Obama's equivalent of that. He started the new tradition of White House Easter Prayer Breakfast. Obama was also very much a religious person.
You find it odd that all Presidents cater to the religious crowd that make up the vast majority of their constituents?
It is a repeating narrative across the board that if Trump does it then it is wrong, but every other President doing the same is right.
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: Klassified
Cool... Now take 3 minutes and think about what that paragraph states....
Just what I said, and I read it the first time which is why I'm chuckling to myself over your unnecessary panic.
originally posted by: Blaine91555
originally posted by: Klassified
originally posted by: Blaine91555
a reply to: Klassified
I guess I'm baffled exactly how this is and issue. A liaison is simply a person who acts as a go between with constituents and since over 80% of his base are religious, or claim to be?
Seems to me you're saying you don't like people of faith, therefore they should be ignored.
The whole we are going to turn into a theocracy thing is just nonsense IMO. That may have been possible 150 years ago or more, but now? Must be a boring news day? No way, no how is the US in danger of becoming a theocracy.
Her specific role will reportedly be advising the Trump administration’s Faith and Opportunity Initiative that aims to boost the voice of religious groups in certain government programs...
That's a bit more than a liaison.
And I said "a haven for dominionists and a quasi-theocracy." I do see a problem with people who want to influence government programs and enact legislation that serves them and their religious ideology rather than the American people.
So over 230 million of us are not really Americans and our needs should not be served and we should not be adequately represented?
We are "American People" are we not?
I don't see Christians asking for special treatment, just common respect and to not be persecuted for Christian beliefs.