Oldest U.S. Monthly Magazine, Scientific American, Warns of 5G

a reply to: Starcrossd

You can buy emf resistant clothing and hoods for sleep, but they are pricey. They also make emf resistant paint for your house, as well as mesh screening for parts not paintable. However the paint is quite expensive.

a reply to: LABTECH767

I agree it is too late. That article mentions 3g and 4g too. I believe all wireless and cellular technology are bad and was the initial Trojan horse that we all fell for. The best thing we can do, as individuals is try to limit our own exposure as much as possible.

a reply to: LABTECH767
Radio induction occurs by flipping magnetic polls rapidly which causes heat. You mention it than go off on a tangent about alternating current which has nothing to do with it.

If you were near a 5gh tower standing i front of it you will feel a warmth on your skin. There are heaters that do this for your home. The heat is produced as i mentioned earlier from switching magnetic polarity. I wont get into a lot of detail but this won't penetrate the body more than a millimeter. So it cant effect DNA thats silly cosmic rays do far more damage to you daily.

Now electrical lines can create a much stronger magnetic field. It doesnt fluctuate its constant. And yes you enter a high enough magnetic field you can effect nerves and muscles. Again no effect on DNA. But 5g doesnt use high voltage so its really irrelevant

a reply to: Tarzan the apeman.

Yes of course that could be measured if one had the proper equipment.

The trouble is that industry and media are remaining absolutely silent about such measurements. They refuse to conduct tests on harms to human from this proposed system.

Sounds like there will be a demand for Faraday Rooms that block all RF signals. Any computer systems in a Faraday Room could be wired with Ethernet cables from a connection outside the room.

There already is a demand for this, and it's a real thing.

www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: The GUT
Of course it's gonna eff with us. It's only debatable to what degree. See Becker et al.

Didn't they once test trial it in Italy?

Realistically, if they start to show evidence of harm to people, the people will take matters into their own hands.
Not just legally; In certain parts of this country, they had better make those transmitters bullet proof.

When real scientists, especially those that staff write for Scientific American, say there are problems, then you best believe that they have evidence to prove it.

The big money behind 5G may not be enough to sustain it, with the pressure they can put on the media giants and the FCC. We will certainly see soon enough.

a reply to: SeaWorthy

I'm sure eventually some manufacturer will offer one.

That the media is so silent about this is what I find fascinating.

They do a lot of "warning" to the citizens and viewers, and pat themselves on the back for looking out for the health and welfare of their viewers, but not a damn word about the dangers of such radiation to their viewers. Bloody crooks.

a reply to: neo96

Wow, great video, great craftsmanship building the Faraday cage.