Four Companies Control the World

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
There is someone behind the curtain controlling it and collecting huge profits.

Who?

I can't prove this because I do not have the resources and knowledge, few do.

Actually you could find out but it requires leg work and most people on this site are far too lazy to do actual digging and rely on some crap YouTube video for 'facts'.

Look up the annual proxy statements for all the companies the buffoon in the article listed and then post what you find, it will be nothing earth shattering and frankly rather mundane. The reality is it's majority held by Average Joe's and not some nefarious cabal of evil bankers bent on global domination.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Look up the annual proxy statements

I will look up a few tonight and see what I find.

originally posted by: LookingAtMars

You're missing the point completely, who owns the institutions? There isn't some single person with majority control, it's a diverse number of individual and group investors who buy into companies like Vanguard who then go and buy shares of other companies so your investment is spread across numerous verticals and industries.

I understand what you are saying and to a degree it is true, no one owns it. There is someone behind the curtain controlling it and collecting huge profits. I can't prove this because I do not have the resources and knowledge, few do. Things are well hidden.

You can't prove it because you don't have the resources and knowledge, yet you are promoting it as true. I find that logic disturbing. You just admitted you don't know what you are talking about.

Vanguard group is a big supporter of this administration. Large donations to the campaign and the largest on the inaugural committee.

Vanguard is all the private prison money. Well, Vanguard is more than that, but all the private prisons are under that group.

originally posted by: schuyler

originally posted by: LookingAtMars

You're missing the point completely, who owns the institutions? There isn't some single person with majority control, it's a diverse number of individual and group investors who buy into companies like Vanguard who then go and buy shares of other companies so your investment is spread across numerous verticals and industries.

I understand what you are saying and to a degree it is true, no one owns it. There is someone behind the curtain controlling it and collecting huge profits. I can't prove this because I do not have the resources and knowledge, few do. Things are well hidden.

You can't prove it because you don't have the resources and knowledge, yet you are promoting it as true. I find that logic disturbing. You just admitted you don't know what you are talking about.

Reading comprehension much? Or just not read the OP? I never promoted anything as the truth. I did not say read this it is fact. All I did was state my belief.

I don't know this website, just ran across it today. The information seems very credible. I don't know how credible the site is.

I have always had the belief that politics just doesn't matter. The politicians are all just puppets for the people who are really ruling.

If I am promoting anything (which I am not) it is the above.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: solve
But someone controls the actions and thoughts of that diverse number of individual and group investors.

Who?

Freemasons of course

Or maybe the Illuminati

The real question is... how do we fight this? I've known about our controllers forever but I'm tired of just sitting and complaining about them

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I give you respect sir for your knowledge on this topic and
humor on others. However to suggest that this world is
not ruled and controlled and even for planned by these
rigid financial giants that have been monopolized by certain
bloodlines? If that's what you are suggesting seems a bit naive
and frankly hard to swallow for me. Who they are seems almost
irrelevant when one hardly needs to call attention to the power
wielded by these mega institutions.

A power so great that I suspect it might even be responsible for
the article that is the subject of this post. When in the end it
offers a solution that takes us directly to the obvious goal of the
rich and powerful anyway.

Other people are already discussing the transition plan towards the economy of the future, where money are no longer required and all individuals will be offered the best conditions to reach their highest potentials — all for the benefit of our species, as a whole.

source

Looks like socialism in the end!

a reply to: carsforkids

And who owns these companies? The largest share is private citizens.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
There is someone behind the curtain controlling it and collecting huge profits.

Who?

I can't prove this because I do not have the resources and knowledge, few do.

Actually you could find out but it requires leg work and most people on this site are far too lazy to do actual digging and rely on some crap YouTube video for 'facts'.

Look up the annual proxy statements for all the companies the buffoon in the article listed and then post what you find, it will be nothing earth shattering and frankly rather mundane. The reality is it's majority held by Average Joe's and not some nefarious cabal of evil bankers bent on global domination.

Had a look at BOA's latest proxy statement and you are correct about it looking rather mundane. Don't see anything proving that the majority of it is held by Average Joe's. Just another shell.

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
Don't see anything proving that the majority of it is held by Average Joe's. Just another shell.

You subtract the institutional holdings from the overall number and you get the number of shares held by privates citizens. You also do the same with the institutional ownership to determine how much is held by citizens.

This is all very basic math.

Great post.a reply to: dfnj2015

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
Don't see anything proving that the majority of it is held by Average Joe's. Just another shell.

You subtract the institutional holdings from the overall number and you get the number of shares held by privates citizens. You also do the same with the institutional ownership to determine how much is held by citizens.

This is all very basic math.

That is just a wild goose chase you are trying to send me on. As I said before it is shells inside shells. You look at institutional ownership and it is just more institutional holdings. I did this legwork already.

I already linked to this in a reply to you. Talk about basic math. This tells me all I need to know.


The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC)

a reply to: LookingAtMars

*sigh*

Now look at the percent of people who own the institutions like I said in the post you're replying to. There isn't one person or persons at the top of each company. When you calculate the individual ownership of the institutions it comes out to be an overall number higher than 50%.

If the institutions are owned in part by other institutions it benefits the individual shareholders because if one company does well both companies do well and the individuals get better returns.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Now look at the percent of people who own the institutions like I said in the post you're replying to. There isn't one person or persons at the top of each company.

Of course there isn't.

You really thought John D. Quintonaire was going to be listed in the proxy statements?

OK, glad we figured this out.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

And who owns these companies? The largest share is private citizens.

Yes I do agree, but think about what you wrote? I don't mean to play
at words with you but the 13 families in reference are most certainly
private citizens. Very powerful private citizens.

originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I give you respect sir for your knowledge on this topic and
humor on others. However to suggest that this world is
not ruled and controlled and even for planned by these
rigid financial giants that have been monopolized by certain
bloodlines? If that's what you are suggesting seems a bit naive
and frankly hard to swallow for me. Who they are seems almost
irrelevant when one hardly needs to call attention to the power
wielded by these mega institutions.

A power so great that I suspect it might even be responsible for
the article that is the subject of this post. When in the end it
offers a solution that takes us directly to the obvious goal of the
rich and powerful anyway.

Other people are already discussing the transition plan towards the economy of the future, where money are no longer required and all individuals will be offered the best conditions to reach their highest potentials — all for the benefit of our species, as a whole.

source

Looks like socialism in the end!

Its AugustusMasonicus you are dealing with here....lol...you will never be able to provide "proof" to Augie.....its a thing with Augie....its like Chicken Little in reverse....."The Sky is not falling!!! The Sky is no falling!!!".....lol...lol.

Of course these few groups are running the show.

Thank you for posting information naming them.

Their days are numbered regardless.

*sigh*

Now look at the percent of people who own the institutions like I said in the post you're replying to. There isn't one person or persons at the top of each company. When you calculate the individual ownership of the institutions it comes out to be an overall number higher than 50%.

If the institutions are owned in part by other institutions it benefits the individual shareholders because if one company does well both companies do well and the individuals get better returns.


We all KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON NOW.....we do not require your level of "proof" it is in fact unreasonable and it gets really hard to handle when you see it so many times on so many different threads.You need to take a break and see someone man.You get to deeply involved in your own wordplay and your own definitions of status quo verbiage...this is why you are never satisfied with anyone elses definition of "poof"....there aint a defense Lawyer in the world that is going to bank on this case...not in the Peoples Court which is what the real world is.

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
You really thought John D. Quintonaire was going to be listed in the proxy statements?

I'm pretty sure when you made that Orignal Post you thought a bunch of super-wealthy people owned all those companies.

originally posted by: carsforkids
...but the 13 families in reference are most certainly
private citizens. Very powerful private citizens.

And they would appear on the proxy statements if they had any actual serious holdings in those companies.