Former ambassador to Ukraine says Trump pushed to oust her

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Sillyolme

That's the point. She hasn't said one thing that Trump did wrong.

TheRedneck

Not only nothing wrong, I have not even heard anything relevant. So he fired her. She works at the pleasure of the president, he must not have been happy with her performance. Even still, it has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Veracity of the witness is a big deal. This is a legal hearing, not a discussion over the deck of cards.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

No one cares what John Solomon says dude. He was fired by the Hill for crying out loud.
Stick to what is relevant please. Stop bringing in one conspiracy after another.

You wangt me to stop posting quotes from people who testified that dont fit your narrative and instead focus on this woman's story that her feelings are hurt for being fired?

No, I think i am posting relevant material about the witness with actual facts to back it up.

Keep up the tempo, the user is breaking.

Usually when one gets emotionally riled up, it is the result of their inability to respond to very valid questions and thus lash out blindly.

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Sillyolme

Veracity of the witness is a big deal. This is a legal hearing, not a discussion over the deck of cards.

TheRedneck

WHAT? I thought it was a discussion over how the cards felt when they were dealt out? Personally this vote delay is getting out of hand.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

No one cares what John Solomon says dude. He was fired by the Hill for crying out loud.
Stick to what is relevant please. Stop bringing in one conspiracy after another.

Got it, by your own comments: third party hearsay about someone heard someone say something that a third party MAY interpret a certain way judged by the feeling of the person who forwarded the hearsay = hard evidence

Direct admission from Kent (dems own "star witness") that is fairly damning to the dems = conspiracy theory

a reply to: MrRCflying

And worse, when Trump tweets with an explanation of why he fired her, it''s witness tampering!

The fake drama level is astronomical!

TheRedneck

originally posted by: MrRCflying

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Sillyolme

That's the point. She hasn't said one thing that Trump did wrong.

TheRedneck

Not only nothing wrong, I have not even heard anything relevant. So he fired her. She works at the pleasure of the president, he must not have been happy with her performance. Even still, it has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

When i was a teenager, I got fired from burger king. The burger king managers said mean things about me that I didnt agree with.

This lowered the morale of all of the other burgerking employees, at a time when sandwiches needed to come out the fastest.

Customers lost their faith in burger king management.

So impeach trump.


Am I doing this right?

a reply to: Grambler

Sounds right to me. I'm not an expert, though.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: MrRCflying

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Sillyolme

That's the point. She hasn't said one thing that Trump did wrong.

TheRedneck

Not only nothing wrong, I have not even heard anything relevant. So he fired her. She works at the pleasure of the president, he must not have been happy with her performance. Even still, it has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

When i was a teenager, I got fired from burger king. The burger king managers said mean things about me that I didnt agree with.

This lowered the morale of all of the other burgerking employees, at a time when sandwiches needed to come out the fastest.

Customers lost their faith in burger king management.

So impeach trump.


Am I doing this right?

Sounds about right! Except most of the information needs to be second and third hand hearsay.

Gotta get serious for a moment here.

For decades now, i have noticed that the modus operandi of Washington DC has been to try and get their policies passed by twisting words to make them sound good. In other words, the public was expected to go along with whatever cockamamie scheme was being presented as long as the wording was done right, with no regard for the actual consequences of the scheme.

It's not working this time, and everything I see seems to be just grasping at straws trying to put the right words together to make "IMPEACH TRUMP!" sound palatable enough to the voting public to have them swallow it. Schiff has no plan. He only has desperate attempts to figure out something, anything that can be used to get those words to fall in the right order.

Not gonna work, though. He's on the last page of the thesaurus, and just now realizing it's the publisher credits.

TheRedneck

a reply to: MrRCflying

Ah, you're better than I am; you're right. It needs to be Grambler's best friend who got fired, because his second cousin's ex-girlfriend talked to a co-worker who heard a rumor he got fired. His best friend claiming to not ever being employed at Burger King would be witness tampering.

TheRedneck

What a POS Schiff is........

he is blocking her from asking questions.......Nunez yielded time. He is still pissed at this young Congresswoman for calling him out now two times in a row to start the hearings. What a petty, petty, and rather bug eyed a**hole he is.

Shiff is such a joke!

a reply to: annoyedpharmacist

Now now, be nice Adam has two of his close friends pending jail time. I think poor little Schiff is probably not doing the best.

Getting defensive! "I stated that clearly." Seems kind of combative.

Whelp! There goes the impeachment.

Judges have been dismissed for less than what Schiff just did silencing cross-examination. Any verdict resulting from that kind of trial would be immediately thrown out, likely with prejudice.

TheRedneck

HAHAHAHA!

She just admitted Kent lied to her when he told her about the call!

TheRedneck

The republicans arent going to ask her about any of the questions i posted, and her rule in pressing ukrainians to drop investigations into Obama allies, are they?

If not, they are imbeciles.

a reply to: Grambler

I think they tried; Schiff threw a fit and said no.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: Grambler
The republicans arent going to ask her about any of the questions i posted, and her rule in pressing ukrainians to drop investigations into Obama allies, are they?

If not, they are imbeciles.

To be fair, they may have been going to, but Schiff shut the young Congresswoman's (Stefanik) questioning down before it began.