Burisma paid Joe Biden 900k for lobbing fees

This was the transfer of Burisma Group's fu
nds for lobbying activities, as investigators believe, personally to Joe Biden through a lobbying company. Funds in the amount of $900,000 were transferred to the U.S.-based company Rosemont Seneca Partners, which according to open sources, in particular, the New York Times, is affiliated with Biden. The payment reference was payment for consultative services," Derkach said.

Burisma paid Joe Biden 900k for lobbing fees

a reply to: LedermanStudio

Did he register as a foreign agent?

So when was he paid? Was it while he was VP, or after? Either way it just adds on to things, but if he was paid to lobby on their behalf while he was VP, then I believe there's a whole other set of laws that got broken.

a reply to: drewlander
Maybe he can register retroactively like the Podesta's.

originally posted by: Guyfriday
So when was he paid? Was it while he was VP, or after? Either way it just adds on to things, but if he was paid to lobby on their behalf while he was VP, then I believe there's a whole other set of laws that got broken.

Damn good question. I didn't see the time of the transfer mentioned.

originally posted by: LedermanStudio
a reply to: drewlander
Maybe he can register retroactively like the Podesta's.

Did this really happen?? Wtf

originally posted by: LedermanStudio

This was the transfer of Burisma Group's fu
nds for lobbying activities, as investigators believe, personally to Joe Biden through a lobbying company. Funds in the amount of $900,000 were transferred to the U.S.-based company Rosemont Seneca Partners, which according to open sources, in particular, the New York Times, is affiliated with Biden. The payment reference was payment for consultative services," Derkach said.

Burisma paid Joe Biden 900k for lobbing fees

Rosemont Seneca Partners is belonging to Hunter Biden, and partner/s since around 2008,,that is not a secret.
I've not seen any reference to Joe Biden being affiliated to that firm.
Hunter Biden also did work for Burisma, before he became a board member of Burisma, in inter-relations with other European countries as Ukraine was trying to do business there...so yes he was a consultant for them, previous to joining Burisma.

I note that the link says, "Affiliated with Biden" without a first name....that's deceptive journalism, much like the other hoax stories on Joe Biden.

a reply to: smurfy

I will agree to take "afilliated with xyz" with the grain of salt just as soon as the media stops using it. "Affiliated with" and " anonymous sources close to xyz" have been the keystone holding every liberal news story together for years now.

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: LedermanStudio

This was the transfer of Burisma Group's fu
nds for lobbying activities, as investigators believe, personally to Joe Biden through a lobbying company. Funds in the amount of $900,000 were transferred to the U.S.-based company Rosemont Seneca Partners, which according to open sources, in particular, the New York Times, is affiliated with Biden. The payment reference was payment for consultative services," Derkach said.

Burisma paid Joe Biden 900k for lobbing fees

Rosemont Seneca Partners is belonging to Hunter Biden, and partner/s since around 2008,,that is not a secret.
I've not seen any reference to Joe Biden being affiliated to that firm.
Hunter Biden also did work for Burisma, before he became a board member of Burisma, in inter-relations with other European countries as Ukraine was trying to do business there...so yes he was a consultant for them, previous to joining Burisma.

I note that the link says, "Affiliated with Biden" without a first name....that's deceptive journalism, much like the other hoax stories on Joe Biden.

I see what your saying. So Burisma paid the company affiliated with Biden. Implying the possibility that this is guilt by association.

I'll keep looking.

Maybe he didn't mean to accept payment.

originally posted by: FamCore

originally posted by: LedermanStudio
a reply to: drewlander
Maybe he can register retroactively like the Podesta's.

Did this really happen?? Wtf

Maybe not exactly, but the irony is... The situation was exposed because of Manafort's prosecution.

www.washingtonexaminer.com...

originally posted by: LedermanStudio

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: LedermanStudio

This was the transfer of Burisma Group's fu
nds for lobbying activities, as investigators believe, personally to Joe Biden through a lobbying company. Funds in the amount of $900,000 were transferred to the U.S.-based company Rosemont Seneca Partners, which according to open sources, in particular, the New York Times, is affiliated with Biden. The payment reference was payment for consultative services," Derkach said.

Burisma paid Joe Biden 900k for lobbing fees

Rosemont Seneca Partners is belonging to Hunter Biden, and partner/s since around 2008,,that is not a secret.
I've not seen any reference to Joe Biden being affiliated to that firm.
Hunter Biden also did work for Burisma, before he became a board member of Burisma, in inter-relations with other European countries as Ukraine was trying to do business there...so yes he was a consultant for them, previous to joining Burisma.

I note that the link says, "Affiliated with Biden" without a first name....that's deceptive journalism, much like the other hoax stories on Joe Biden.

I see what your saying. So Burisma paid the company affiliated with Biden. Implying the possibility that this is guilt by association.

I'll keep looking.

Well, we know that according to Dems that's enough to prosecute/impeach.

Or is there a second set of laws for the (D).

originally posted by: Lysergic
Maybe he didn't mean to accept payment.

Who?

a reply to: LedermanStudio

Whats this, more dubious lobbying? that hasn't happened since two seconds ago.

It's time to go back to the soap box and the megaphone, enough with shady dealings.

a reply to: smurfy

I note that the link says, "Affiliated with Biden" without a first name....that's deceptive journalism, much like the other hoax stories on Joe Biden.

So clickbait then. And journalists wonder why they get a hard time?
Goes to show you gotta go past the headline.
Wonder how many people read the thing like you or, just skimmed the header and claimed some moral victory?

a reply to: LedermanStudio

It's interesting that a reporter asked President Trump about Joe's $900,000 "take", during this afternoon's press briefing.

He said he hadn't heard anything about this, but wouldn't be surprised.

originally posted by: drewlander
a reply to: smurfy

I will agree to take "afilliated with xyz" with the grain of salt just as soon as the media stops using it. "Affiliated with" and " anonymous sources close to xyz" have been the keystone holding every liberal news story together for years now.

There is a difference there too though, and arguably, it is, 'Anonymous sources that could hold the, 'High Ground' as opposed to, 'Afilliated with' while not to say that is always the case, but there are times when there is good reason, not to reveal someone's identity.
I'm reminded from a poster on a YouTube site where I posted something, related to this subject, but of another matter, of this Mark Twain quote,
"It's easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled."
I could go with that no bother, it is almost perfect for those in denial of what they see and hear everyday, which is diametrically opposed to what they want to believe, the caveat being, I don't find that MT thus far, ever said that....but It is often affiliated with MT.
However it is the seemingly eternal trick that people often seem to want to play on themselves, that of self delusion, probably have done it myself, but up to a certain point though.

Still and all, I see things posted in ATS, that scream propaganda influence, when similar posts pop up in other threads, especially when those posts are meant to be passed on to perpetuate misnomers, often, as in this case something that goes back a bit more than a few years.

a reply to: smurfy

I dont know if we hold foreign countries accountable to show us a balance sheet on how they spend sll their money. Even if we only tracked our contribution they could kick back out of their own accounts and cover it up. All that said, i would not be the least surprised to find of 1.4 billion in relief provided to ukraine that 500 million was laundered back into the pockets of lobbyists and our elected officials etc.

Not one flippin dollar should be kicked back with foreign aid. Everyone should be pissed about this.

He threw 900k in a high arc?

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: LedermanStudio

This was the transfer of Burisma Group's fu
nds for lobbying activities, as investigators believe, personally to Joe Biden through a lobbying company. Funds in the amount of $900,000 were transferred to the U.S.-based company Rosemont Seneca Partners, which according to open sources, in particular, the New York Times, is affiliated with Biden. The payment reference was payment for consultative services," Derkach said.

Burisma paid Joe Biden 900k for lobbing fees

Rosemont Seneca Partners is belonging to Hunter Biden, and partner/s since around 2008,,that is not a secret.
I've not seen any reference to Joe Biden being affiliated to that firm.
Hunter Biden also did work for Burisma, before he became a board member of Burisma, in inter-relations with other European countries as Ukraine was trying to do business there...so yes he was a consultant for them, previous to joining Burisma.

I note that the link says, "Affiliated with Biden" without a first name....that's deceptive journalism, much like the other hoax stories on Joe Biden.

So Biden's sons company was paid $900k for lobbying by a gas company in Ukraine just as his father became VP, then later was put on the board and was paid at least $50k a month after travelling WITH his father to Ukraine....

... move along, nothing to see here.... its all Trumps fault for investigating it.