It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
IMO the speaker has instituted a perpetual impeachment investigation with no scope.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
it is not the constituion
it is the rules of the house
otherwise the speaker of the house solely wields impeachment power and not congress or the house for that matter
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: shooterbrody
IMO the speaker has instituted a perpetual impeachment investigation with no scope.
Without a vote of the whole House, there simply is no Impeachment Inquiry/investigation. Period.
Please stop spreading falsehoods.
They can investigate all they want, but they have no legal authority to compel anything unless it is within their Constitutionally delegated Power of legislative oversight.
One important caveat regarding the House’s power to enforce subpoenas through civil suit is that under existing precedent, authorizations for such suits may not be initiated solely by individual legislators or legislative committees. In a 2006 case, minority members of the House Government Reform Committee sought a court order granting them access to certain records at the Department of Health and Human Services.117 The court held that the Supreme Court’s decision in Reed v. County Commissioners—which held that Senators could not bring suit to enforce a subpoena unless the full Senate specifically authorized them to sue118—“put Congress on notice that it was necessary to make authorization to sue to enforce investigatory demands explicit if it wished to ensure that such power existed.” 119 In short, following the district court decisions described above, “it appears that all that is legally required for House committees, the House general counsel, or a House-retained private counsel to seek civil enforcement of subpoenas or other orders is that authorization be granted by resolution of the full House.”120 This power is sure to be a critical aspect of the House’s ability to enforce subpoenas and, more broadly, its ability to fulfill its right to effectively investigate.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Prove that any court in this country has found that a full House vote is required for subpoenas to be enforceable.
Because the Supreme Court disagrees ... Kilbourne V Thompson (1880).
The Supreme Court first addressed the scope of Congress’ power to investigate in 1880, in a case called Kilbourn v. Thompson. The case arose after a special committee was created to investigate the bankruptcy of an investment firm that held U.S. government funds. Hallett Kilbourn was ordered to appear before the committee to testify and to bring records with him, but Kilbourn was held in contempt after he refused both to answer questions about the people involved and to bring records. The Supreme Court threw out the contempt order, holding that the House of Representatives did not have the power to authorize the investigation and, therefore, to force Kilbourn to testify. The court explained that no one can be punished for contempt “as a witness before either house unless his testimony is required in a matter into which that house has jurisdiction to inquire, and we feel equally sure that neither of these bodies possesses the general power of making inquiry into the private affairs of the citizen.”
originally posted by: Oraculi
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Oraculi
time.com...
Justice Department Says Trump's Ukraine Call Doesn't Constitute Campaign Finance Violation
nope
not a violation
Prosecutors from the Justice Department reviewed a rough transcript of the call and determined the president did not violate campaign finance law.
I hope this clears things up.
Ahhh another misunderstanding of the law. Let me clear it up.
The Justice Department does not prosecute the president, in fact no law enforcement organization can prosecute the president. The US Constitution makes it clear that ONLY the Congress has the power to investigate AND to prosecute the president of the United States.
It makes no difference what the Justice Department says whether it's a crime or not, they are outside of their element and their jurisdiction.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: tanstaafl
Surely you realize that the impeachment investigation is not the vote on the Articles of Impeachment (the actual "event" of Impeachment)?
I've never claimed anything similar to any individual having "the power of impeachment."
I have said clearly that a) the Constitution gives the House the power of Impeachment and b) there is no legal or parliamentary requirement for a vote before investigation.
If you have some other factual information ... I'll be glad to hear it.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
there is no requirement for a vote to begin
to have enforcement power they DO have to have a full house vote
There must be a vote for there to be a formal Impeachment Inquiry/investigation.